http://www.singaporean.com/

• ^tamago^

  10 May 08, 17:50

  http://www.singaporean.com/
  
  We've been owned.....
• Rejected

  10 May 08, 17:54

  WHAT THE FUCK?!

• FireIce

  10 May 08, 17:56

  last time i play yahoo games
  when ppl ask for ASL, and i said Singapore, some will ask,... where is tt?... some ask... is it part of china?
  dunno whether isit ppl ignorant.... or we tt sek bai........

• TooFree

  10 May 08, 18:40

  Yes! They owned the domain in name.

• FirePig

  10 May 08, 18:43

  It has been deactivated already.

   

  http://www.singaporeans.com/
• annoy-you-must

  10 May 08, 18:54

  Is this some kind of practical joke or something? Someone purposely trying to piss off singaporeans...

• Lorry`

  10 May 08, 19:39

  pwned deep deep

• ^tamago^

  10 May 08, 20:13

  Originally posted by FirePig:

  It has been deactivated already.

   

  http://www.singaporeans.com/

  
  thanks but no 's' behind de. :(
• QX179R

  10 May 08, 20:42

  they should use china.com instead..

• Alucard101

  11 May 08, 00:36

  Out side this small place,not many ppl really knows the country.

  Originally posted by FireIce:

  last time i play yahoo games
  when ppl ask for ASL, and i said Singapore, some will ask,... where is tt?... some ask... is it part of china?
  dunno whether isit ppl ignorant.... or we tt sek bai........

   

• juantan

  11 May 08, 00:53

  Sometimes when people do not know where Singapore is, i label them as STUPID.

  Singapore is such a strong and impact-ful country in ANY sense. How can they not know us? Even so, is Singapore Airlines FAKE?

• udontknowme

  11 May 08, 01:02

  Originally posted by juantan:

  Sometimes when people do not know where Singapore is, i label them as STUPID.

  Singapore is such a strong and impact-ful country in ANY sense. How can they not know us? Even so, is Singapore Airlines FAKE?

  hi please lah.

  singapore is not TTTHHHHHAAAAAAATTTT great ok?

  and you think airlines is so great arh? many pple no take plane before. and cannot afford to take planes. so fer fark they need to know about airlines?

• Ferret

  11 May 08, 01:05

  funniex

• alleggerita

  11 May 08, 01:11

  Originally posted by juantan:

  Sometimes when people do not know where Singapore is, i label them as STUPID.

  Singapore is such a strong and impact-ful country in ANY sense. How can they not know us? Even so, is Singapore Airlines FAKE?

  Ask yourself why is SIA so successful? When you delve deeper, you'll realise SIA is under Temasek Holdings. And guess what? Temasek Holdings is the govt's disguise in trying to put a hand in all of the big businesses in Singapore and we all know it.

  Can you see why when people sue SIA, they so willingly compensate and they compensate a super big sum of money? They don't have to be afraid, they have the backing of our govt.

  Look at Emirates as well. They are definitely also partially funded by Dubai's govt. Hence their success as well.

  If SIA is a freaking independent company with ABSOULTELY no link to our govt, I can be quite sure they won't be as successful as they are now.

• SBS2695H

  11 May 08, 01:25

  Originally posted by alleggerita:

  Ask yourself why is SIA so successful? When you delve deeper, you'll realise SIA is under Temasek Holdings. And guess what? Temasek Holdings is the govt's disguise in trying to put a hand in all of the big businesses in Singapore and we all know it.

  Can you see why when people sue SIA, they so willingly compensate and they compensate a super big sum of money? They don't have to be afraid, they have the backing of our govt.

  Look at Emirates as well. They are definitely also partially funded by Dubai's govt. Hence their success as well.

  If SIA is a freaking independent company with ABSOULTELY no link to our govt, I can be quite sure they won't be as successful as they are now.

  
  If this is the case, I wonder if British Airways and some popular European airlines are partially funded by their govt. I also wonder if Malaysia airlines is partially funded by the Malaysia govt. If I'm not wrong, I believe British Airways wasn't too willing to compensate when they had check in problems at London Heathrow's new Terminal 5.

• alleggerita

  11 May 08, 01:28

  Originally posted by SBS2695H:

  
  If this is the case, I wonder if British Airways and some popular European airlines are partially funded by their govt. I also wonder if Malaysia airlines is partially funded by the Malaysia govt. If I'm not wrong, I believe British Airways wasn't too willing to compensate when they had check in problems at London Heathrow's new Terminal 5.

  Exactly isn't it? You said it. BA wasn't too willing to compensate. If they gave super compensations, think about how much it will eat into their revenue.

  In whatever way I look at it, I will still attribute a part of SIA's success to its link to the govt. Of course, I'm not totally dismissing the capabilities of the directors at SIA. This is just my opinion.

  Edit: typo

• Dead_Man_Inc

  11 May 08, 01:49

  since so many china ppl here in already

  maybe we should call ourselves chinapore