Opps! Pardon my late reply! Slept early last night..... *GRINZ* Well, the flock of sheep I am referring to is the bond-breakers and the black sheeps will be those who already have intentions to break the bond even before signing up for the scholarship! When I say that you should not pin-point, I mean you should not deem all bond-breakers to be the same as different people has different reason and of course different aspiration upon graduation. I am sure those who have intention to break their bond right from the beginning belong to the minority group and many actually want to continue to serve the bond except that the working environment may not be suitable for them now that they have different and higer expectations maybe.Originally posted by moose:Well,the black sheeps you are speaking of are those from the bond breakers or those from the scholars?If they are from the bond breakers,then who are the black sheep in that group?If they are from the scholars groups,i presume the black sheep are those bond breakers rite?Kindly enlighten me ass i will reply once i get ur post and after i see my dino show,heheeh
Normal human beings who have the chance to be able to get something that other normal human beings want and can't get and having the scholars behaving this way where they have themselves utmost in their mind instead of the firm that gave them their scholarship,no wonder people get angry,heheeOriginally posted by Revelations:I guess it is understandable for everyone to be upset over the comments made by the scholar. And justifiably so. It simply shows that you all hold this group of scholars in high regards, and harbouring such thoughts are deemed unthinkable and unforgiveable. Totally understandable. But if you think of them as normal human beings, might be hard, but do try. The only fault now is simply putting self ahead of firm. Well, will that be shocking then???
Some of those scholars i bet are not that really need and some are quite well to do from what i have seen of Government scholars,none really need the scholarship as they definitely want the scholarship in name only and have no wish to serve their bond.I am sure none are son's of taxi drivers or security guards and even if there is,they are in the minority.Those scholars who are well to do and yet wish to scholarship to show off on their resume are selfish as they are depriving someone who really wish to have the scholarship and serve their bond a chance to do so and in the end,the organisation that gives out the scholarship and those who need the financial help are at the losing end,heheeOriginally posted by Revelations:However, I still stick to my earlier statement that the fact they deprive other scholars of choice does not stand.
Well,some scholars seem to want the $$$,but not to pay back in terms of youth.Originally posted by Revelations:It is simply an award given to the cream of the crop, in exchange for the six best years of their lives (used to be eight somemore). In short, it is sort of a business transaction on the government's part. They provide the money, you provide them the youth.
Nope,rather those well to do people should just study at their own expense which they can do reasonably well instead of competing with other less well to do people for scholarships and then turning around and refusing to serve the bond.Originally posted by Revelations:So one question though, would it be justifiable to say that a rich kid is any less worthy of a scholarship and that a family income ceiling be imposed to all scholarship applicants??? And should the family income of an applicant be indexed as one of the chief considerations in awarding the scholarship??
Hahaha, well, they want to $$$, and refuse to pay back in terms of youth, so they pay back in terms of $$$, plus more $$$ in the form of very high interests, isn't that true???Originally posted by moose:Well,some scholars seem to want the $$$,but not to pay back in terms of youth.
Hahaha, well, that would mean that rather than risk the possibility of bond breaking, the government should apply that income ceiling to deny themselves of the possibility that from these high income families, there might exist someone of calibre who can be groomed into one of our future leaders??Originally posted by moose:Nope,rather those well to do people should just study at their own expense which they can do reasonably well instead of competing with other less well to do people for scholarships and then turning around and refusing to serve the bond.
Hehehehe, that's why within the Salvation Army HQ there are the Salvation Army stuff who would distribute the free stuff appropriately to the needy. There is a filtering medium, just like for the scholarships, there is a board, so not anyone who wants the stuff can get it, right??Originally posted by moose:To use a similar analogy : If you see a rich person driving up in a Mercedes and stopping by the Salvation Army HQ to rummage for free stuff while using his chauffeur to shoo the rest of the needy away so he can pick his stuff,what are your thoughts on it?heeheh![]()
Hahahaha, how about this, if you can't change them, why not join them??Original message by moose:Yup,the world is cruel,why make it anymore crueler?heehe
Oh yeah,but not everything can be equated with $$$ nowadays,after all,even if they have the $$ to pay back,it also reflects on their character and their thinking that as long as you have $$$,not being able to keep to a contract or your word is ok,heeheOriginally posted by Revelations:Hahaha, well, they want to $$$, and refuse to pay back in terms of youth, so they pay back in terms of $$$, plus more $$$ in the form of very high interests, isn't that true???
But the possibility is remote as so far,those bond breakers seem to be from high income family and this may give you a rough approximation of how people from that income group think although there are some who are the exception,and i suggest that the criteria for selecting scholars should be tighen as it's obvious that it's not good enough,maybe as Francis Fukuyama said,it has something to do with our morals,after all,if they have the proper morals,this problem won't arise in the 1st place,hehee
Hahaha, well, that would mean that rather than risk the possibility of bond breaking, the government should apply that income ceiling to deny themselves of the possibility that from these high income families, there might exist someone of calibre who can be groomed into one of our future leaders??
Hehehehe, that's why within the Salvation Army HQ there are the Salvation Army stuff who would distribute the free stuff appropriately to the needy. There is a filtering medium, just like for the scholarships, there is a board, so not anyone who wants the stuff can get it, right??
Hahahaha, how about this, if you can't change them, why not join them??
Hor hor, u implying that people with a little more money should not be awarded scholarships, and shouldn't be presented with the same opportunities as the rest of their peers, prejudice......tsk tsk tsk, heheheOriginally posted by moose:But the possibility is remote as so far,those bond breakers seem to be from high income family and this may give you a rough approximation of how people from that income group think although there are some who are the exception,and i suggest that the criteria for selecting scholars should be tighen as it's obvious that it's not good enough,maybe as Francis Fukuyama said,it has something to do with our morals,after all,if they have the proper morals,this problem won't arise in the 1st place,hehee![]()
Hehehehe, that's why within the Salvation Army HQ there are the Salvation Army stuff who would distribute the free stuff appropriately to the needy. There is a filtering medium, just like for the scholarships, there is a board, so not anyone who wants the stuff can get it, right??Originally posted by moose:But what if the rich guy turns up in rags,how is the salvation army going to know who is the rich trying to take advantage and save a few $$ and who are the truly needy?After all,an item given to a truly needy person,the needy person will appreciate it more than someone who is able to just buy it from the shelves,but chose not to as he can get it free albeit not in very good condition from the Salvation Army,heeh![]()
Hahahaha, ok ok, can see u good guy, but be careful hor, dunt let urself kena bully by not so good guys out there *evil grin*Originally posted by moose:Hahaha,i not so hard hearted person,so i cannot find myself being cruel to others unless they really deserve it,so i just be kind hearted and live my life this way,no need to join the gang as the gang is not worth joining,heheeh![]()
Hehehehe, that's why within the Salvation Army HQ there are the Salvation Army stuff who would distribute the free stuff appropriately to the needy. There is a filtering medium, just like for the scholarships, there is a board, so not anyone who wants the stuff can get it, right??Originally posted by Revelations:Hahahaha, ok ok, can see u good guy, but be careful hor, dunt let urself kena bully by not so good guys out there *evil grin*![]()
![]()
Hahahaha, ok ok, can see u good guy, but be careful hor, dunt let urself kena bully by not so good guys out there *evil grin*