Combat obesity with fat tax (NOT!!!)
-
Combat obesity with 'fat' tax (Not)
My reply to Combat obesity with 'fat' tax :
Dr Lam must be Sinkies politician, always finding excuses to use the stick to make $$$. Can I suggest an annual reward (/carrot) system like for NSmen IPPT but physical fitness test is run by private companies: if a certain grade is met, then a certain cash stipend is paid. This grade can be in the form of cholesterol levels, diabetes state, smoker/nonsmoker, blood pressure, BMI, time taken to run 2.4km/ swim 1km or stationary cycle 20km/ sit ups in 2 minutes or skipping 3mins/ wheelchair spinning 2.4km etc: a total score (lab test plus fitness test) stratified according to age. Everyone gets the same stipend, ~$300/annum, however, only those with good results get it in cash, the rest/ absentees get it as medisave top-ups vs cash with medisave top-ups in greater proportion. Those with spectacular results (top 33%) get a small cash bonus e.g. $100 more for their efforts and setting a good example for the rest.
Three chances to take the physical test and the annual blood tests at polyclinic are FOC, anything else is chargeable and people take the physical fitness test at their own risk (just pon the thingie if afraid, then all cash 'health incentive' goes 100% to medisave)
Those who cannot do any of the aerobic activities including the wheel chair option perhaps shouldn't object to the medisave top up. Guess if medisave is topped up to certain limit, than Edusave is topped up and eventually the guy gets (unlikely) overflow in $$$.
All food is taxed already under 7% GST, difficult to impose sugar/ fat vices tax: ICA already has problems stopping people from sneaking in, don't give them extra headache.
With this preventive health scheme, $300 from medisave p.a. can be claimed on preventive healthcare reform including authorised gym membership and fees for other health activities: e.g. $20 sponsorship of sports activity/ 100% payment for govt dietitian/ physio visits etc.
Budget expense $$$ calculations:
SG population (2013)= ~3.313million, PR=531,200. Suppose each Singaporean receives $300, upper 1/3 get $100 bonus, PR get half of anything Singaporean gets,
Population strength value= 3.5786million.
Total annual budget cost= 3.5786million X $333 = $1191.6738million.
Given that gahmen healthcare spending is set to "hit $8billion by 2015", I guess spending $1.192 billion on preventive healthcare is perhaps peanuts in this respect, (rather than hit "S$12 billion a year by 2020")Quote:Healthcare spending to hit S$12b by 2020, says Tharman
The government's projected healthcare spending is expected to triple to S$12 billion a year by 2020, up from S$4 billion in 2011. Healthcare spending, he said, will reach S$8 billion in 2015 -- a year earlier than what had initially been projected.
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/...o/1021468.html
Quote:The Straits Times, Published on Apr 01, 2014
Combat obesity with 'fat' tax
ONE in eight people in the world is undernourished, yet people in affluent nations like Singapore are wasting food, at the retail and consumer stages, at an alarming rate ("More food going to waste"; March 19).
Another big problem is overindulgence in food, leading to obesity.
The obesity epidemic has become a worldwide phenomenon. Singapore has not been spared - our adult obesity rate increased from 6.9 per cent in 2004 to 10.8 per cent in 2010.
Obesity is a major cause of diabetes, stroke and cardiovascular disease. If the obesity epidemic is allowed to grow unfettered, it will take a toll on our health-care system.
The weakest link in our fight against obesity is complacency - mainly because the condition does not kill someone quickly and easily.
The Health Promotion Board has done its utmost to encourage healthy eating through public education and collaboration with the food and beverage industry to provide healthier options.
But gorging is still common in food centres, fast-food outlets and eat-all-you-can buffets.
In tandem with existing efforts, a "sugar" and "fat" tax of at least 20 per cent to 30 per cent ought to "shock" Singaporeans into changing their eating habits.
Taxes on vices are not new - we already have high tobacco and alcohol taxes.
Taxing unhealthy food, such as sugary drinks and junk food, will hopefully induce people to opt for healthier food, which needs to be cheaper than unhealthy food.
The marketing of unhealthy food, much of which are addictive, also needs to be controlled, similar to measures against the advertising of cigarettes and alcohol.
Food supply chains need to adhere uniformly to health guidelines.
Singaporeans must be convinced that reducing the prevalence of obesity will significantly cut their future medical costs and universal health insurance premiums.
Let us learn the lessons of tobacco use - the ill effects of smoking were discovered 50 years ago, and it was only decades later that our Government took action - rather belatedly.
In short, take the scourge of obesity seriously - now.
Edmund Lam (Dr)
Copyright © 2014 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved.
http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/...t-tax-20140401__________________ -
The Straits Times, Published on Apr 03, 2014
Where do we draw the line?
I AGREE with Dr Edmund Lam's point that obesity increases the risk of many diseases, which would take a heavy toll on our health-care system ("Combat obesity with 'fat' tax"; Tuesday).
His suggestion to implement a "fat" or "sugar" tax is indeed a creative way to deter individuals from buying fattening food, but it seems rather impractical.
Overindulgence in any food, and not just fatty or sugary food, can lead to obesity.
In fact, studies reveal that the consumption of artificial sweeteners, and not just sugar, correlates with higher risk of metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension and coronary heart disease.
So, should we impose a tax on artificial sweeteners as well? Not to forget carbohydrates like bread, rice and pasta, which also contribute heavily to obesity.
Where do we draw the line on what is and what isn't taxable?
Perhaps we should not focus so much on restricting the availability of food.
Instead, we should inculcate the importance of proper nutrition and exercise in very young children via the school system, as well as in their parents, so that children can grow up with the knowledge and habits to make healthy food choices for the rest of their lives.
Luke Ho Boon Choong (Dr)
Copyright © 2014 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved.
http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/...-line-20140403 -
I need to change my diet.
-
Originally posted by charlize:
I need to change my diet.
Dont eat cai png anymore -
I am very thin.
i want to tax fat people to supply my thin people wardrobe.
The fat people can just put a piece of paper over their fats.
-
Dr Edmund Lam :- People eat too much sugar....tax....still eat......tax more ......sugar is bad and people cannot think for themselves so I'll think for them
Dr Luke Ho Boon Choong :- If people cannot think for themselves we should educate... we should not take away their freedom of choice
Dr Edmund Lam :- But they cannot think for themselves...
Dr Luke Ho Boon Choong :- That's why you educate....the choice is still theirs ...if they still decide on sugar at least it was an educated decision
-
make luncheon meat from their fats to feed charlize :lol:
-
-
kick charlize :lol: