tell grandmother stories?......Originally posted by Parka:Is it possible to create jobs only for the old? What is it that they do best that the young can't.
ponders ponders ponders...
was at kenny rogers @ suntec last Sat.....the clear plates and wipe tables one oso lao ren jia......but those behind the counter, taking order and serving food one are youngsters.......Originally posted by Spear:I was just talking about this age thing with a friend few days ago.
Apparently the only potential employer that we could turn to in our old age is McDonalds.
Think they're the only fellows who hire old older folks.
A gentle word, my friend.Originally posted by Parka:planning starts now.
I dont think that solving the problem of older jobseekers is that difficult. I think one of the fundamentals of contract based jobs is to select the best person to do the job within a set amount of time, however, that is beside the point. if you add the barrier of old age into the picture, it will affect everyone in due time, because everyone grows old. I am not against contract work but I am against barriers that are institutionalised, and ideologies that prevent hardworking people from finding a job.Originally posted by [ Neo ]:And how do you propose that we stop this Age discrimination?
Of course we know the current widely practiced HR doctrine of ‘hiring young and firing old’ isn’t at all a fair manner of treatment to staff whom have contributed to the growth and survival of a company or organization over the years of their employment.
We can’t effectively enact a law to strictly dictate all employers to give word that retrenchment or dismissal will not be carried out because this is neither feasible nor viable especially when the even the MOM stand on this issue is such that ‘bitter medicines’ are sometimes the only available solutions. [/quote]
Yes agreed that this is a widely practiced HR doctrine... BUT, there should be valid reasons for retrenchment or dismissal, and it should not be based on age. Reasons based on better shareholder profits, to me, is not a good enough reason. Any retrenchment and dismissals should take the welfare of all stakeholders in mind. Furthermore, retrenchment should be accompanied by helping the laid off employee survive after being retrenched, examples such as retraining etc. I also think there are effective ways of putting a stop to this widely practiced doctrine. If there is a law that stops this age discrimination and an effective way to police this law, it will work. An seperate ministry could be set up to assist people who have been wrongly dismissed could work too. (just a thought)yes we are in a new knowledge based economy but that does not change the fact that the old need jobs too. It does not change the fact that the route Singapore is taking is not sustaining the lives of its people. If it is reality, it does not mean that we should stand by it if it is not going to work out in the long run. Should age be a factor if the person is older, but have the 'right mix of education, pratical experience and exposure'? Is a company responsible if they practice age discrimination?
Not that I am an avid supporter of this trend, but this is the reality that our local economic and business environment has already evolved into today.
Other than to put down on our desire to see the old days of lifetime employment opportunities making a comeback from the grave, what we may only do, is to attempt re-assessing on the new Knowledge-based turn of economy as we presume will be the dominant paradigm that sustains the local economy and hope to find some smaller niche in which some space will be available for older folks with the right mix of education, practical experience and exposure may still offer contributions forth in return for some basic remuneration.
It is also widely understood that now a days, there is no such thing as lifetime employment with one company. People come and go, they use companies as stepping stones to better theirselves. But again, if age is going to be a major factor why people cannot find jobs. It makes no difference if there is lifetime employment or not.
What kind of spaces are you talking about, working in Macdonalds? even with the qulifications that one might have? If the birth rates in SG is going to remain low, and older people are not going to get the jobs they are well qualified to do, Companies here will hire more overseas people to do the job, older people will get frustrated, younger ones will feel that they have to compete against overseas people, and the cycle begins. If there were no age requirements/barriers for job placements, then there will be less reasons for people to feel frustrated. it will be fairer, because overseas people that come to SG to work will be here because they have the qualifications not just because they are younger.
[quote]
There will be hell of a lot more changes to the employment trends and practices in time to come. And at the foremost, we are already seeing a volume of job openings being converted to the typical 2 years contract term (especially in Stat boards).
Whether a youngster in his early thirties can successfully ensure a smooth and undisrupted path of career advancement, even this once a fundamental and silly to ask question we can’t answer now – let alone worry and attempt to solve the even more difficult set of challenge that older jobseekers face.
ItÂ’s not a matter of we-know-but-we dun-want-to-solve.
ItÂ’s a matter of we-know-but-we-dun-know-how-to-solve.
Originally posted by [ Neo ]:A gentle word, my friend.
No Plan survives its first contact with Reality.
Hey, dun be sorry for my dad, at least he get to work(tot the pay is peanuts)Originally posted by SGglobalist:Yes I agree work hard and wait for the 'golden years'... but, I am also thinking about others who have debts to pay, and they are getting older; whereby they are working in an environment where their bosses see old age as retrenchment time. I am also thinking about those who have little savings because everything is spent on the high cost of living.
I think you are lucky to understand that saving is a great asset, but how about the growing majority of people who are getting deeper into debt. Or those caught in between this struggle of restructuring income in SG, seeing their income decrease.
Age plays such a big role as a barrier to older workers. These older debt induced individuals who is increasingly becoming the majority of Singaporeans, will be the ones feeling the bite of this barrier in the near future.
I am sorry to hear about your dad.
In a society that the old are living longer and healtier lives, we as citizens must think of ways to help stop this problem before people like you and me (the younger ones *blush*) will have to go through this too.
I know the young are not really getting jobs too, that is another issue, not a totally saperate issue. However, why I concentrate on the old is because, some of them are forced to leave because they have reached that age. Some are made to feel weak and useless, so that they will leave on their own accord.
This I think is unacceptable and this discrimination should stop. That is why I think curbing this ideology of old people not being able to work is good and we should all work towards it. because if we don't the repercussions will be felt by us in the future... live examples are slapped in our faces right now, they are everywhere. What should we do?
Originally posted by ShutterBug:This thing with age discrimination is a crying shame of SIngapore's employment scene. Keep up this trend of attitude, and we will have a large pool of unemployed local citizens who are over 40 years of age. As a fact, even for a local guy who is 35, the chance of landing a job is already rather slim.
I mean, there is of course nothing that a younger person can't do that an older one can. But employers, don't forget, younger people DO NOT have staying power. They are opportunistic, and will not think twice of hopping around. I know most employers here do not employ older people because of the prosepect of paying for their medicals ( as most people who grow old do come up with some form of ailment ) and medical costs in Singapore is indeed costly.
So what's left for Singaporeans when they grow old? If no one wants older LOCAL people, where can they fit into? I know about this problem, and I'm planning early to get the hell out of this country to retire comfortably. Instead of growing old and unwanted here.
This issue has been around for donkey years, and yet our government DOES NOTHING about it. They harp about babies, talk about us being choosy, not planning for our futures, but did they take a peek behind the scenes of older people here who can't apply their years of experience in any field just because of their age? I doubt so.
Where is the love? Just like that song - Where Is the Love???