'A' Level Qn.
M has formula C13H16O. it decolourises aq bromine and produce white fumes with PCl5. it reacts with hot KMnO4 to produce N (C8H8 O), P (C3H2O5) and Q (C2H4O2). N does not react with fehling but react with aq alkaline iodine to give yellow ppt + salt R (C7H5O2Na). P gives effervescence with solid sodium carbonate and gives orange ppt with dinitrophenylhydrazine. Q gives effervescence with solid sodium carbonate but no ppt with dinitrophenylhydrazine. identify M N P Q R.
Answer :
N - CH3 CO C6H5
P - HOOC CO COOH
Q - CH3 COOH
M - C6H5 C (CH3) = C (CH2OH) CH = CH CH3
'A' Level Qns.
Qn1.
When a mixture of the sodium salts of two mono-carboxylic acids is electrolyzed, a mixture of alkanes is produced.
RCOO- + R’COO- à R-R + R-R’ + R’-R’ (note : the equation is not balanced)
Electrolyzing a mixture of the sodium salts of two mono-carboxylic acids M and N produced three alkanes O, P and Q, which could be separated by fractional distillation.
On titration, a solution containing 0.10g of the acid N required 16.7cm3 of 0.10mol/dm3 NaOH(aq) to reach equivalence point.
A gaseous sample of 0.10g of O took up a volume of 54cm3 at a temperature of 380K and a pressure of 1 atm.
Complete combustion of a sample of P, yields 10.12g of CO2 and 6.21g of H2O.
When Q was reacted with bromine under UV light, only two isomeric monobromo compounds R and S were produced. Compound R rotates plane polarized light.
Elucidate the structures of M, N, O, P, Q and S. Explain your reasoning. Draw a “mirror image” diagram to show the two stereoisomeric forms of R.
Qn2.
Compounds T and U are isomers. Both are gaseous hydrocarbons with slightly different boiling points.
In an experiment, 15cm3 of T was combusted with 120cm3 of oxygen gas at a temperature of 150°C. The residual gases that remained at the end of the combustion process, when cooled to room temperature, experienced a reduction of 60cm3 in gas volume. When bubbled through aqueous sodium hydroxide, only 30cm3 of residual gas remained.
When U was reacted with chlorine under UV light, exactly three structurally isomeric monochloro compounds V, W and X were produced. Compound V exists in two enantiomeric stereoisomeric forms, V1 and V2.
Based on number of H atoms substitutable, X would be generated in greater quantities compared to W. Based on stability of alkyl radical intermediates, W would be generated in greater quantities compared to X.
Upon undergoing the same reaction, T produced only one monochloro product Y1. Upon further exposure to chlorine and UV light, T can be dichlorinated to produce Y2, which exists as 3 possible structural isomeric forms.
Elucidate T, U, V1, V2, W, X, Y1, and the 3 isomeric forms of Y2. Explain your reasoning.
Name the two enantiomeric forms of V using IUPAC nomenclature.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Answers :
Qn1
M is CH3CH2CH2COOH
N is CH3COOH
O is CH3CH2CH2CH3
P is CH3CH3
Q is 2,3-dimethylbutane
S is 2-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane
R is 1-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane, which exists in two enantiomeric isomeric forms :
Based on dextrorotatory & levorotatory classification;
(+)-1-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane (or d-1-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane)
and (-)-1-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane (or l-1-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane)
Based on rectus & sinister classification; R-1-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane and S-1-bromo-2,3-dimethylbutane.
Qn2
T is cyclobutane
U is 1-methylcyclopropane.
W is 1-chloro-1-methylcyclopropane
X is 1-chloromethylcyclopropane
Y1 is 1-chlorocyclobutane
V is 1-chloro-2-methylcyclopropane, which exists in two enantiomeric isomeric forms :
Based on dextrorotatory & levorotatory classification;
(+)-1-chloro-2-methylcyclopropane (or d-1-chloro-2-methylcyclopropane)
and (-)-1-chloro-2-methylcyclopropane (or l-1-chloro-2-methylcyclopropane)
Based on rectus & sinister classification; R-1-chloro-2-methylcyclopropane and S1-chloro-2-methylcyclopropane.
The 3 isomeric forms of Y2 are 1,1-dichlorocyclobutane, 1,2-dichlorocyclobutane and 1,3-dichlorocyclobutane.
Note that overall, W would far outweigh X in terms of quantity generated, as a tertiary alkyl radical intermediate is very much more stable than a primary alkyl radical intermediate. (Furthermore, the ratio of H atoms substitutable for X and W is a relatively low ratio of 3 to 1, as opposed to, for instance, 9 to 1.)
'O' level / 'A' level Qn
Someone posted :
"NH3 + H2SO4 --> ??
NH3 is an alkali right? Alkali + Acid --> Salt + Water. Online sources show the ammonia being absorbed by the acid to form [NH4]2 SO4, but I don't really understand why."
I replied :
Don't blindly memorize without understanding why acid + base = salt + water. (Well, if you're 'O' levels, most of it is blind memorization without understanding, but if you're 'O' levels and you've exceptional interest and ability, or if you're 'A' levels H2/H1/H3 / IB Diploma / Poly Chemical Sciences Diploma, then you should do your best to understand rather than blindly memorize).
Wikipedia out the 3 definitions of an acid and a base : Arrhenius, Bronsted-Lowry, Lewis.
For most purposes in acid-base chemistry, we use the Bronsted-Lowry definition. Ammonia is a proton acceptor. Sulfuric(VI) acid is a proton donor. (Where protons = H+ ions)
The reason why acids + alkalis generate a salt and water, is because the protons (Lewis acid) from the acid combine with the hydroxide ions (Lewis base) from the alkali, to form water. What's left over (the spectator ions from acid and alkali), is called the salt. In terms of the mechanism, we say the hydroxide ions donate a lone pair to form a dative sigma bond with the proton.
Ammonia is a weak base, and therefore it is a weak alkali. A base (if you use the Bronsted definition of a base) is a proton acceptor. When it accepts protons from water, the conjugate acid of the protonated base is the NH4+ ammonium cation. The conjugate base of water is the hydroxide ion.
NH3 + H2O <---> NH4+ + OH-
However, because the hydroxide ion is a significantly stronger base than the ammonia molecule, the position of equilibrium lies strongly to the left. Which means to say that in a bottle labelled as "ammonium hydroxide NH4OH(aq)", the majority of the species present is really NH3(aq) rather than NH4OH(aq), and hence the bottle is more properly labelled "aqueous ammonia NH3(aq)".
If you wish, you can still write the standard acid + base = salt + water equation as follows :
2NH4OH + H2SO4 --> 2H2O + (NH4)2 SO4.
However, as explained in my preceding paragraphs, technically it is more correct (ie. relevant) to write the equation as :
2NH3 + H2SO4 --> (NH4)2 SO4
(assuming experimental molar ratios allow for this.)
There are many alternative equations that are also relevant and/or acceptable, such as those involving hydrolysis of the base to generate hydroxide ions (ie. NH3 + H2O --> NH4+ + OH-), hydrolysis or proton dissociation of the acid to generate hydroxonium ions H3O+ (ie. H2SO4 + H2O --> H3O+ + HSO4-), and the 'main' equation itself could be H3O+ reacting with the OH-, or H3O+ reacting with the NH3, or H2SO4 reacting with the OH-, or H2SO4 reacting with NH3, etc etc.
Acid-base chemistry can certainly be fascinating, interesting and fun to work with. But depending on your current level of study, eg. if you're 'O' levels now, it may be more practical to mentally accept a fair bit of blind memorization first, and look forward to the deeper and more correct understanding at higher levels, at 'A' levels H2/H1/H3, IB Diploma, Chemical Sciences Poly Diploma, University levels (you'll study varying aspects/levels/areas of Chemistry in almost all Science-based degree courses, eg. Medicine, Engineering, Biology, etc) at various levels, Bachelors Honors Masters Doctorate, etc.
Enjoy your academic life ahead!
'O' & 'A' Level Qn
It has been found that the chemical BPA (bisphenol A) commonly found in many plastics (eg. drinking bottles, food packaging) causes heart disease, liver disease and diabetes.
Google these keywords "chemical in plastic BPA heart disease diabetes" for more information.
For 'A' level students, given that the IUPAC name is 4,4'-dihydroxy-2,2-diphenylpropane (it might help to consider an alternative name 2,2-para,para'-diphenolpropane), draw the compound, then check your answer here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bisphenol_A_skeletal.png
For 'O' & 'A' level students, by referring to the structure given above, count :
a) number of valence electrons in one molecule of BPA
b) number of (valence) non-bonding electrons in one molecule of BPA
c) number of (valence) bonding electrons in one molecule of BPA
d) number of non-valence electrons in one molecule of BPA
e) total number of electrons in one molecule of BPA
Answers :
Number of electrons (highlight with mouse)
a) 88
b) 8
c) 80
d) 34
e) 122
'A' Level Qn.
Explain the difference in rates of (ie. susceptibility towards) hydrolysis of silicon tetrachloride, SiCl4, versus carbon tetrachloride (aka tetrachloromethane), CCl4.
-----------------------------
"longchamp3" wrote :
hey, i dont understand the hydrolysis of silicon tetrachloride and its acidity. Is hydrolysis the breaking up of hte H-OH bond in water? and it states that hydrolysis is bossible because of the energetically accessible vacant 3d orbitals available for dative bonding with water molecules. i know that the O atom will have a dative bond with Si, but isnt the O atom supposed to be with the H atom in the OH- anion? and does that mean that the Cl atoms leave when there is dative bonding with the O atom? gosh im confused =(
"kineticenergy" wrote :
In the case for SiCl4, Si is able to accommodate lone pairs of e-, due to energetically accessible vacant 3d orbitals. This means that in water, lone e- pair in O atom of H2O will fit into the empty 3d orbitals of Si, due to attraction between the nucleus of Si and e- pair of O atom. The attraction is so great that one of O-H bond is weakened till it breaks, forming H+ and OH-, with the OH- bonded to Si causing one Cl- to leave. This process is repeated, eventually forming SiO2. The H+ that has left will form H3O+ with a H2O molecule, which results in the solution being acidic.
"longchamp3" wrote :
When u say that the H+ will form H30+ with other H2O, resulting in an acidic solution, u mean to say that H3O+ is acidic? And i thought the equation for hydrolysis for SiCl4 is SiCl4 + 2H2O -> SiO2 + 4HCl? so what is the H attached to the O in the OH- still doing down there?
I wrote :
HCl(aq) can equivalently be written as H+(aq) and Cl-(aq) which can equivalently be written as H3O+(aq) + Cl-(aq).
So do you see that it's ok to write either HCl(aq) on the RHS, or H3O+(aq) and Cl-(aq) on the RHS? Both are correct and acceptable.
Just to add, there is another (secondary) reason that CCl4 is resistant to hydrolysis while SiCl4 is susceptible to hydrolysis, other than the existence of energetically accessible vacant 3d orbitals available in Si (in contrast to C) TO ACCEPT dative covalent bonding FROM nucleophilic water molecules during hydrolysis (HYDROLYSIS is definted as the REACTION of any particular species WITH WATER), thereby facilitating or increasing the rate of hydrolysis reaction by allowing for a more stable intermediate.
This (secondary) reason has to do with the relatively better shielding effect (ie. shielding against the water nucleophile) of the partially negatively charged Cl atoms (due to electronegativity difference) of CCl4, compared with SiCl4, due to the shorter bond lengths of C-Cl versus Si-Cl.
Note that for 'A' levels, just the (primary) reason of having energetically accessible vacant 3d orbitals available in Si (in contrast to C) to accept dative covalent bonding from nucleophilic water molecules during hydrolysis, will suffice for the H2 syllabus.
'A' Level Qn (with some aspects of the discussion going beyond the requirements of the H2 syllabus)
Originally posted by TenSaru:If have a question too! (sorry for invading your tread)
If protic solvents form hydrogen bonds with nucleophiles and slow down Sn2 reaction tremendously then why is it that most of the nucleophilic substitution (of halogenoalkanes in h2 chem) reagents and conditions involve ethanol as solvent?
First, some additional info for H2 Chem students, to serve as a background for this discussion.
Solvents may be classified as protic polar, aprotic polar and aprotic non-polar (for obvious reasons, 'protic non-polar' solvents do not exist).
If a reactant in the rate-determining step is charged (eg. OH- ion in SN2), increasing the polarity of the solvent will decrease the rate of the reaction. If none of the reactants in the rate-determining step are charged (eg. alkyl halide in SN1), increasing the polarity of the solvent will increase the rate of reaction.
This occurs because :
For charged reactants (in the rate determining step, eg. SN2), a polar solvent will stabilize the (charged) reactants more extensively than it will stabilize the transition state (which is relatively less charged; as charge is spread out over more atoms), increasing the activation energy and decreasing the rate of reaction.
For non-charged reactants (in the rate determining step, eg. SN1), a polar solvent will stabilize the (charged) transition state more extensively than it will stabilize the (uncharged) reactants, decreasing the activation energy and increasing the rate of reaction.
For SN2 reactions, the nucleophile is presumably charged (otherwise, SN1 would more likely predominate). Consequently, a protic polar solvent stabilizes the nucleophile more extensively (by way of strong hydrogen bonds) and hence decreases the rate of reaction for reasons discussed above.
Since using protic polar solvents slow down SN2 reactions, shall we use (aprotic) non-polar solvents (eg. CCl4) instead? The problem with using non-polar solvents, is that the negatively charged nucleophile (eg. OH- ion) will not dissolve in non-polar solvents, nor be miscible with the (relatively) non-polar alkyl halide substrate, as they would rather form ionic (electrostatic) interactions with each other instead (eg. Na+ and OH-), hence the reaction is unable to proceed.
So do we have no better solution (pun intended) to this dilemma? Actually, we do. The solvent to dissolve (pun intended again) this difficulty, lies in a middle-man so to speak. Something polar enough to dissolve the charged nucleophile, but not solvate it so extensively (via hydrogen bonds) that it slows down the rate of the SN2 reaction.
In short, we need an aprotic polar solvent, such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). (See Wikipedia for a list of aprotic polar solvents). Thus the rate of an SN2 reaction with a negatively charged nucleophile will be greater in an aprotic polar solvent than in a protic polar solvent.
Consequently, an aprotic polar solvent is the solvent of choice for an SN2 reaction in which the nucleophile is negatively charged, while a protic polar solvent is used if the nucleophile is a neutral molecule. For SN1 reactions in which the uncharged alkyl halide is the only reactant in the rate determining step, a protic polar solvent is most effective in increasing the rate of the SN1 reaction.
Now, to address TenSaru's question on why despite slowing down the SN2 reaction, ethanol is often used as a solvent in the H2 Chem syllabus.
First of all, in regards to the H2 Chem syllabus, I'll like to point out that for the hydrolysis (ie. reaction with water) of alkyl halides (a.k.a. halogenoalkanes) to form alcohols, which is a nucleophilic substitution reaction (it could be SN2 or SN1, depending on whether the akyl halide is primary, secondary or tertiary; ie. tertiary alkyl halide presents greatest steric hinderance for nucleophile in SN2 *and* greatest stability of carbocation intermediate of SN1; conversely primary alkyl halide presents least steric hinderance for nucleophile in SN2 *and* least stability of carbocation intermediate of SN1), the H2 Chem student is expected to use aqueous solvent.
(The reason why it is called 'hydrolysis' is because water may function as the nucleophile here; after the nucleophilic attack, the loss of a proton to rid the positive formal charge on the O atom consequently yields an alcohol. However, to speed up the rate of reaction, hydroxide ions are introduced in the form of an alkali. Notice that water is the protonated conjugate acid of the hydroxide ion, and hence the initial hydrolysis product is the protonated conjugate acid of the alcohol generated; subsequent loss of a proton generates the same alcohol product that the hydroxide ion nucleophile would directly generate.)
In contrast, for elimination or dehydrohalogenation of alkyl halides to form alkenes, the H2 Chem student is expected to use alcoholic solvent (eg. ethanol).
The reason for this has to do with the behaviour of the hydroxide ion. Although both water and alcohols are protic polar solvents, but water affords more extensive ion-dipole and hydrogen bond interactions for the hydroxide ion, compared to an alcohol solvent (due to the one less partially positively charged H atom available, and the presence of the non-polar alkyl group of the alkanol/alcohol).
Consequently, the hydroxide ion is (relatively) more unstable in alcoholic solvent than in aqueous solvent. The more unstable a negatively charged species is, the greater its propensity to behave as a base. (Since a base accepts protons in a bid to stabilize itself).
In summary, this is the reason why alcoholic solvent is used for elimination reactions of alkyl halides, while aqueous solvent is used for hydrolysis reaction of alkyl halides (as far as the H2 Chem syllabus is concerned).
(Unfortunately, JCs do not teach H2 Chem students what I've just explained, which means JC students resort to blind memorization without understanding. I make it a point to share with my tuition students these and other relevant explanations, so that they can understand more clearly and consequently can appreciate Chemistry more deeply, than they would in their JC environment where blind memorization is the unfortunate norm.)
But back to TenSaru's question, why use aqueous or alcoholic solvents for SN2 reactions, since water and alcohols are protic polar solvents and will slow down SN2 reactions? Wouldn't an aprotic polar solvent work better?
Several points.
1. The H2 Chem syllabus does not explore the role of protic polar, aprotic polar, and aprotic non-polar solvents, and how they affect SN2 and SN1 reactions. Hence, the H2 Chem student has only two choices - aqueous or alcoholic.
2. Hydrolysis (nucleophilic substitution reactions with water or hydroxide ions as the nucleophile) of alkyl halides, is not differentiated into SN2 vs SN1 in the old (ie. before 2010) H2 Chem syllabus, and therefore generally employ water (a protic polar solvent) as the solvent of choice, ie. aqueous conditions. Even though this works better for SN1 than for SN2.
Even though the new H2 Chem syllabus starting 2010 does require the H2 Chem student to draw both the SN2 and SN1 nucleophilic substitution mechanisms, but the only factor that influences SN2 vs SN1 that they need to know would be tertiary vs secondary vs primary alkyl halide (ie. tertiary alkyl halide presents greatest steric hinderance for nucleophile in SN2 *and* greatest stability of carbocation intermediate of SN1; conversely primary alkyl halide presents least steric hinderance for nucleophile in SN2 *and* least stability of carbocation intermediate of SN1), and not the role of the protic polar, aprotic polar and aprotic non-polar solvent. Hence water is still employed as the solvent of choice for hydrolysis reactions, while alcohols are employed as the solvent of choice for elimination reactions and nucleophilic substitutions involving non-polar reactants (my next point).
3. In the H2 Chem syllabus, for the formation of nitriles, the H2 Chem student is required to heat or reflux alcoholic KCN with alkyl halides, to generate nitriles in a nucleophilic substitution reaction (whether by SN2 or by SN1). There is yet another reason for alcohol as the choice of solvent, rather than water (even though both are protic polar solvents; as stated earlier, the H2 Chem syllabus is not concerned over this aspect).
The reason being :
The alkyl halide electrophile (eg. bromoethane) is largely non-polar. The nucleophile is ionic (eg. K+ and CN-). If water is used, yes the nucleophile reactant is miscible with water, as ion-dipole interactions are established. But the electrophile (the alkyl halide) reactant, being (largely) non-polar (and hence incapable of either ion-dipole, hydrogen bonding or even the weaker permanent dipole-dipole interactions to any significant extent), will not dissolve well in water. Hence, the reaction is unable to proceed.
But if alcohol solvent is utilized (in spite of it being a protic polar solvent; as discussed earlier, whether by SN2 (unfavourable) or SN1 (favourable), the role of protic polar vs aprotic polar vs aprotic non-polar solvents are ignored by the H2 Chem syllabus), in place of aqueous solvent, then because the alcohol molecule consists of both a polar (hydroxy) group and a non-polar (alkyl) group, it is able to effective function as a middle-man, someone that is able to form favourable interactions with both reactants.
As an analogy, the ionic nucleophile (eg. CN- and its counter ion K+) are the ruling elite snobbish aristocratic class, while the non-polar alkyl halide (eg. bromoethane) are the lower working class peasants or serfdom. The elite snobs woud rather interact with each other than with the lower class (ionic bonding is incomparably stronger than ion - induced dipole interactions). So the reaction (which requires both reactants to meet and react with each other) is unable to proceed to any appreciable extent. However, if you've a bourgeoisie middle class that could get along with both the elite snobs and the lower class, you might actually have a chance to get them to meet and the reaction to proceed.
Enter the bourgeoisie alcohol. Part elite polar (hydroxy group), part working class non-polar (alkyl chain). The hydroxy group is capable of ion-dipole and/or hydrogen bonding with the nucleophile (eg. CN- ion), and the alkyl chain is capable of instantaneous dipole - induced dipole van der Waals interaction with the electrophile (eg. bromoethane).
Hence, utilizing an alcoholic solvent is a cunning manipulative trick, to get the two otherwise immiscible reactants (ionic CN- ion, and non-polar alkyl halide) to interact, and the reaction to proceed.
(Again, tragically, JCs do not explain these underlying rationales to the H2 Chem students. Which only serves to perpetuate the myth that Organic Chem is all tough memory work. Nonsense. My tuition students have the privilege of understanding these underlying rationales, and hence have the opportunity to enjoy Organic Chem without having to suffer torturous blind memorizations.)
So finally again, to summarily address TenSaru's question :
>>> If protic solvents form hydrogen bonds with nucleophiles and slow down Sn2 reaction tremendously then why is it that most of the nucleophilic substitution (of halogenoalkanes in h2 chem) reagents and conditions involve ethanol as solvent? <<<
Because :
1) Ethanol is useful in allowing both reactants (usually one non-polar and one ionic) to be more miscible, and hence for the reaction to proceed. Between the two protic polar solvents of water and alcohol, the alcohol is the superior choice in this regard; even though (see next point)
2) Indeed, an aprotic polar solvent (eg. DMSO) would be better for SN2 reactions, but the H2 Chem syllabus does not concern itself with the role of protic vs aprotic polar solvents. Nor as much with SN1 vs SN2 pathways. So ethanol is fine for the H2 syllabus (even though DMSO would be better for SN2).
3) Just a reminder that in the H2 syllabus, water or aqueous solvent is used for hydrolysis (to generate alcohols), while alcoholic solvents are used for other nucleophilic substitution reactions (eg. to generate nitriles), and for elimination reactions (to generate alkenes).