The DNA of God?

• Chewbacca

  30 Mar 05, 09:16

  http://religion-cults.com/cloning/god.htm
  
  Could human blood remnants that contain a man's DNA be traces of the blood of Jesus? Does it contain the DNA of God?
  
  The DNA of God?, by Leoncio A. Garza-Valdes: It is the fascinating story of this microbiologist's journey of discovery and of the earthshaking secrets he has revealed about the Shroud of Turin.
  
  Dr.Garza-Valdés, on page 120 states that blood remnants from the Shroud of Turin, from the areas of the left hand (taken by the STURP group in 197 and from the occipital region (taken by Riggi in April 21, 198 were tested with PCR for the presence of three gene segments:
  
  1- Betaglobin gene.
  2- Amelogenin-X gene.
  3- Amelogenin-Y gene.
  
  The testing was done at the PCR laboratory of the Department of Microbiology at the university of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, headed by Dr. Victor Tryon.
  
  All three segments of the human genes tested were positive, indicating that the blood of the Man of the Shroud came from a human male.
  
  The betaglobin gene from chromosome-11 was the first segment of DNA that was studied and cloned. It is the easiest gene to study, and the results were excellent: 268 base pairs (nucleotides) were found. The control used this cloning was HUMHBB221.
  
  And here are the results of this betaglobin gene segment from the blood of the Shroud, cloned from the occipital area blood glob:
  
  The DNA of Jesus?... the DNA of God?:
  
  Con TCCTAAGCA GTGCCAGAAG AGCCAAGGAC AGGTAGCGGCT GTCATCACTT 1450
  Shr GAAG AGCCAAGGAC AGGTNCCAAT GTCATCACTT 34
  TCCTAAGCCA GTGCCA (PRIMER)
  Con AGACCTCACC CTGTGGAGCC ACACCCTAGG GTTGGCCAAT CTACTCCCAG 1500
  Srd AGACCTCACC CTGTGGAGCC ACACCCTAGG GTTGGCCAAT CTACTCCCAG 84
  Con GAGCAGGGAC GGCAGGAGCC AGGGCTGGGC ATAAAAGTCA GGCAGAGCC 1550
  Shr GAGCAGGGAG GGCAGGAGCC AGGCTGGGC ATAAAAGTCA GGCAGAGCC 134
  Con ATCTATTGCT TACATTTGCT TCTGACACAA CTGTGTTCAC TAGCAACCTC 1600
  Srd ATCTATTGCT TACATTTGCT TCTGACACAA CTGTGTTCAC TAGCAACCT 184
  Con AACAGACAC CATGGTGCAC CTGACTCCTG AGGAGAAGTC TGCGGTTACT 1650
  Shr AAACAGACAC CATGGTGCAC CTGACTCCTG AGGAGAAGTC TGCCGTTACT 234
  Con GCCCTGTGGG GCAAGGTGAA CGTGGATGAA GTGGTGGTG AGGCCCTGGG 1700
  Srd GCCCTGTGGG GCAAGGTGAA CGTGGATGAA GTTG 268
  (primer) GTGGTG AGGCCCTGGG
• Chewbacca

  30 Mar 05, 09:19

  In case some if u didnt know especially those non christians, THe shroud of Turin is the cloth used to wrap the body of Jesus Christ during his crucification
  
  A dried bloody image of jesus christ has been imprinted on the cloth and this is where they got the DNA from..SO this means its basically the DNA of god which makes it possible to clone back Jesus Christ....
• Chewbacca

  30 Mar 05, 10:37

  
• FireIce

  30 Mar 05, 10:53

  u have jus evoked the memories of my horrible genetics class whereby i sat there and kept asking myself, watdehell the prof toking abt.........i actually share some same genes with a cockroach!?!??!
• crazy monkey

  30 Mar 05, 22:52

  clone dinosaurs better.
• skyfoo

  30 Mar 05, 22:57

  wrong, the DNA of God is nothing.
• Chewbacca

  31 Mar 05, 02:05

  Originally posted by skyfoo:

  wrong, the DNA of God is nothing.

  why not?
• F Takumi

  31 Mar 05, 02:18

  Read this, it's quite funny.
  
  http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/faq010.html
• F Takumi

  31 Mar 05, 02:24

  Originally posted by Chewbacca:

  In case some if u didnt know especially those non christians, THe shroud of Turin is the cloth used to wrap the body of Jesus Christ during his crucification
  
  A dried bloody image of jesus christ has been imprinted on the cloth and this is where they got the DNA from..SO this means its basically the DNA of god which makes it possible to clone back Jesus Christ....

  Discovery Channel ran a documentary on the Shroud of Turin quite sometime ago, it claimed that the shroud was a fake.
• SMAPLionHeart

  31 Mar 05, 02:38

  Yup , ive read on encyclopedia saying it was proven to be fake after they used some "dating methods" to find out which era it came from.
• Chewbacca

  31 Mar 05, 04:20

  Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:

  Yup , ive read on encyclopedia saying it was proven to be fake after they used some "dating methods" to find out which era it came from.

  Wrong, i think very reccent evidence state that Carbon Dating is in fact inaccurate and u have to multiply the results by a factor of 3..They have tested ancient artifacts with a known timeline with carbon dating and it showed that it was vastly inaccurate..