Looks like its getting really serious....
-
I can't believe my luck! hahaha look at this...
I said on 15th Nov to "convert some of your money into Thai Baht..." and of course I myself did just that and was doing that before the 15th when the S$ was at the highs... and see the Singapore dollar against the Thai Baht now?[quote]Originally posted by AndrewPKYap: 15 November 2007 · 01:24 PM... as for you personally, try to keep your job.... and be mentally prepared... and follow the weekly trends....
Clear all your credit cards debts and any debts that you can clear....
If you have savings, convert some of your money into Thai Baht... because Thailand is the second biggest economy in SEA... and you can go to Thailand by bus...
Don't be fooled by people telling you to cash in through speculating... like casino gambling, you imagine you will make lots of money but lose everything instead...
As you can see from the chart, around the 15th Nov, Singapore dollars was at the top and has plunged since then...
... and that is excluding the interest rates you receive, which is so much better than the misery rates the despots pay people in Singapore...
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:... hahaha... concentrate... coolie... I know you can do it ... there are no short cuts... you have to monitor the markets diligently and make wise decisions knowing profoundly how and why people win as well as how and why people lose...
-
... it is a good thing that the Singapore finance minister was sacked and replaced...
... and they should sack and replace his "husband" as well. -
...over to you coolie... please be diligent and bumpz up my thread regularly.... I need to go and and provide some consultation services for my clients ...
-
This is like the worst reporting ever.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:coolie... its the holidays seasons... relax...
Bush has announced a plan to tackle the housing debt problem.
The 1st world democracies in Europe had pushed their currencies to record highs against the US$
The coolie democracies in Asia are supporting the US$, and causing massive inflation like in Singapore... while the US and the other 1st world democracies continue to party like there is no tomorrow and they have no choice because they are coolie economies, and as a coolie yourself, you should understand their mentality...
Both in the form of prose and factual accuracy. -
oh this is priceless.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:I can't believe my luck! hahaha look at this...
I said on 15th Nov to "convert some of your money into Thai Baht..." and of course I myself did just that and was doing that before the 15th when the S$ was at the highs... and see the Singapore dollar against the Thai Baht now?
As you can see from the chart, around the 15th Nov, Singapore dollars was at the top and has plunged since then...
... and that is excluding the interest rates you receive, which is so much better than the misery rates the despots pay people in Singapore...
From the guy who has said "gambling, like forex trading, never pays" and "you need stuff like insider knowledge to make a profit"(paraphrasing here).
His insider knowledge apparently is the fact that you can take a bus to thailand. -
Only a simpleton would make a conclusion like that....
Is it any wonder that he is an insane idiot that thinks "odds ARE everything?" -
.. how idiotic it is for someone to conclude that just because I made money investing in Thai Bahts just before 15th Nov, it means that speculating, gambling in forex can be profitable...
... I can't believe what simpletons some people are... -
I don't. But then again, I've listed before many MANY reasons why forex trading is not just a stab in the dark. You on the other hand have given me zero reasons to support your stand.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:.. how idiotic it is for someone to conclude that just because I made money investing in Thai Bahts just before 15th Nov, it means that speculating, gambling in forex can be profitable...
... I can't believe what simpletons some people are...
I was just amused about your claim of baht 'investment', and your reasons behind it. -
"You don't"?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
"odds ARE everything... " according to you, and you defended that line for more than 10 pages and continue to say that you are proud to believe that, remember?
When people say, the universe is everything, then they are saying that there is nothing else... no heaven or hell.
How can there be "many reasons" when "odds ARE everything.... "?
Obviously, in your mind you are so confused you have no idea what you are saying, what you are thinking and what you are believing.
Simpleton, insane idiot. -
... and in your simpleton, confused state of mind, you attacked me and issued me a threat that is suppose to give me "a rough ride" and I was supposed to "hang on tight".... remember? Or are you one of those idiots that don't even know what they wrote? Which would not be surprising since you are a simpleton, insane idiot.
-
right, because insulting ppl always makes you right. My dear Andrew. Like I've repeated oh so many times, we're no longer boys fighting in the playground. Kindly be more mature when phrasing your arguments. A little concrete logic behind said arguments would help immensely too.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:"You don't"?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
"odds ARE everything... " according to you, and you defended that line for more than 10 pages and continue to say that you are proud to believe that, remember?
When people say, the universe is everything, then they are saying that there is nothing else... no heaven or hell.
How can there be "many reasons" when "odds ARE everything.... "?
Obviously, in your mind you are so confused you have no idea what you are saying, what you are thinking and what you are believing.
Simpleton, insane idiot.
Seriously, I can't believe you claim to have good English based on the fact that you may or may not have written a book yet to be published. And then, a few posts down, give this kind of gibberish.
Your arguments against my statement have thus far been illogical, and when pressed, incapable of establishing doubt. Repeating the same crap over and over again will not further your cause. Who's the Simpleton now?
I have indulged you weeks ago by writing two long posts describing the reasoning behind my position. Your only rebuttal thus far has been to call me an idiot, reasoning that explaining your rebuttal to an idiot is a waste of time. Sorry bro, that doesn't work in the real world. Also, your (only) rebuttal point of my statement being wrong simply because people offer programs online to calculate odds for POKER is so far off the logic charts I'm surprised you could even imagine it.
Basically you're going to need to come up with hard answers for some of the garbage you've been spewing. This is just one of the more recent ones. Let's revisit the topic that started your recent insult post:
1) You claim that forex trading is a stab in the dark. This implies you think any currency trades is pure speculation and doomed to failure in the long run.
2) You follow up previous point with a hint that you have been successful only because you used "insider information", and that only by trading on "insider information" can anyone be successful in trades.
3) You predict a rise in Thai baht against the SGD. Reasons cited :
"because Thailand is the second biggest economy in SEA... and you can go to Thailand by bus...
"
4) Thai baht appreciates against SGD. You now claim to have bought on the baht, citing this as an example of your expertise.
It does not take much to put two and two together and realise you are either saying:
1) you believe that the statements "thailand is 2nd biggest economy in SEA" and "you can go to thailand by bus" are considered insiders information, AND that they were the driving influence in the recent appreciation of the baht against the SGD.
OR
2) You believe your previous statements about all forex trades being a gamble AND recognise that the above statements do not constitute insiders information. In this case, you have been obviously GAMBLING with the baht, and now claim credit on a winning gamble, hoping to increase your credibility as a market guru.
It is of point to note that Andrew does not even talk about having bought the baht until after the baht appreciated. Talk about hindsight. I don't even see why you bother posting about markets or gambling anymore Andrew. I have obviously crushed you in both arenas in terms of knowledge and common sense.
Oh btw Andrew, don't worry. I don't make empty threats(even if you misunderstand them). You'll get what's coming. I promise. -
Good that's what I want to hear... I thought you have completely chickened out... but apparently you are too stupid to do that...Originally posted by deathbait: 08 December 2007 · 01:39 PMOh btw Andrew, don't worry. I don't make empty threats(even if you misunderstand them). You'll get what's coming. I promise.
... just know that in the meantime, I am thoroughly enjoying the ride... waiting for you to find the courage to carry out your threats -
I notice you completely ignored the part where I broke down your arguments into smaller parts to prove you are a complete fraud.
Perhaps a rebuttal on that front? You know, at least pretend you're a serious advocate against gambling or something. -
... are you mad? You want me to seriously reply to someone that has proven himself a complete idiot?
-
Considering you're the only one who thinks he's proved me an idiot, AND has had considerable difficulty PROVING that I'm an idiot.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:... are you mad? You want me to seriously reply to someone that has proven himself a complete idiot?
Yes. -
Hope Andrew donates some to struggling opposites with some of the windfall.
-
hahaha there is no need for me to do it... you have done it all by yourself when you insist that "odds ARE everything... " and when you issue empty threats... but of course, insane people and idiots do not know that they are idiots and insane...Originally posted by deathbait:Considering you're the only one who thinks he's proved me an idiot, AND has had considerable difficulty PROVING that I'm an idiot.
Yes. -
... there is no need to read what insane people and idiots write... what can idiots and insane people write that is worth replying to? When people are confused in their minds and they have fundamental flaws in their thinking... what comes out is just rubbish.... you can only expect rubbish to come out of a rubbish truck.
Out of a refrigerator, you get mostly good food but sometimes, the food is kept too long in the fridge and so sometimes you get bad food.
Out of a rubbish truck... only rubbish comes out...
Words coming out of idiots that do not understand how "xxxx is EVERYTHING" is fundamentally wrong and words coming out of insane people issuing threats is like what comes out of rubbish trucks... only rubbish comes out... -
I won't repeat myself. After numerous failed attempts to teach you how sweeping statements work, I've given up. You obviously will insist the world is flat if I said the world was round.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:... there is no need to read what insane people and idiots write... what can idiots and insane people write that is worth replying to? When people are confused in their minds and they have fundamental flaws in their thinking... what comes out is just rubbish.... you can only expect rubbish to come out of a rubbish truck.
Out of a refrigerator, you get mostly good food but sometimes, the food is kept too long in the fridge and so sometimes you get bad food.
Out of a rubbish truck... only rubbish comes out...
Words coming out of idiots that do not understand how "xxxx is EVERYTHING" is fundamentally wrong and words coming out of insane people issuing threats is like what comes out of rubbish trucks... only rubbish comes out...
But the logic still stands. Even IF I was indeed wrong about my statement, the validity of my questions still stand. Do not use a strawman argument to deflect the serious questions. If you are indeed who you say you are, and have expertise in the areas you claim to be an expert in, the questions posed to you thus far should prove to be pretty basic. But you've been dodging them for a month now. Others are asked similar questions only to be ignored by you too.
So I can only conclude you are a total fraud. This is not a zero sum game. I don't have to be right all the time to prove you wrong. -
This is what I mean by rubbish only comes out of rubbish trucks...Originally posted by deathbait:I won't repeat myself. After numerous failed attempts to teach you how sweeping statements work, I've given up. You obviously will insist the world is flat if I said the world was round.
But the logic still stands. Even IF I was indeed wrong about my statement, the validity of my questions still stand. Do not use a strawman argument to deflect the serious questions. If you are indeed who you say you are, and have expertise in the areas you claim to be an expert in, the questions posed to you thus far should prove to be pretty basic. But you've been dodging them for a month now. Others are asked similar questions only to be ignored by you too.
So I can only conclude you are a total fraud. This is not a zero sum game. I don't have to be right all the time to prove you wrong.
... just because I choose not to answer your questions, you conclude that I am a "total fraud"...
What an idiot, with a delusion of grandeur, thinking that you are such an important person that people must answer your questions... while failing to see how your questions are questions from a stupid person.
Insane idiot with a delusion of grandeur. -
that's a silly reply.
When you introduce yourself as an expert on a subject and start lecturing about certain opinions of yours, it is of course necessary for you to answer questions and not just fling insults.
Sure, you can decide to ignore all difficult questions and reply with seriously inept insults, but that just shows you up as a fraud.
Seriously though, you never entertain the idea that you might be wrong, right? Anyone who even slightly doubts your theories HAVE to be wrong. I think that pretty much sums up what kind of person you are. -
In a matter of honesty,Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:This is what I mean by rubbish only comes out of rubbish trucks...
... just because I choose not to answer your questions, you conclude that I am a "total fraud"...
What an idiot, with a delusion of grandeur, thinking that you are such an important person that people must answer your questions... while failing to see how your questions are questions from a stupid person.
Insane idiot with a delusion of grandeur.
You have been choosing to NOT answer most questions, whether be it from deathbait or Gazelle.
No one declared himself an expert in this field. You were the one who started advising people what to do in the stock market. And of course, people will ask questions, and naturally, the expert must answer.
So seriously, can't you just answer deathbait's questions, because its very interesting for those who don't know about investments, to have more insights into your point of view?
Thank you. -
I started this thread to discuss the situation... not "advising people what to do in the stock market".Originally posted by soul_rage:In a matter of honesty,
You have been choosing to NOT answer most questions, whether be it from deathbait or Gazelle.
No one declared himself an expert in this field. You were the one who started advising people what to do in the stock market. And of course, people will ask questions, and naturally, the expert must answer.
So seriously, can't you just answer deathbait's questions, because its very interesting for those who don't know about investments, to have more insights into your point of view?
Thank you.
If it were a discussion, of course that would not be a problem...
... but if you look at his attitude, he starts of by attacking me... ditto Gazelle.
If they think that they are so smart, let them be... all I need to do is to point out how stupid they are with good examples and evidence of their stupidity....
There is no need for me to enlighten them...
You look at Chin Eng... did he say, "hmmm why did you use "in the line" instead of "on the line" ? ... I think "on" is more appropriate".
No he said "hahaha call yourself a writer and you use "in" instead of "on""
Of course I will attack him (and CX) for being too stupid to see that the mouse cursor is "in" and not "on" the computer screen image.
As for yourself... "soul_rage", I do not like to discuss anything with you because you are willing to come to conclusions even when there is no evidence for something.... how to talk to people like you?
You expect people to accept your beliefs. How to accept what you say at face value when you are not the son of god or a reincarnation of somebody.
It is a very big problem that you have but you refuse to acknowledge it. -
Haha... Whether the mouse cursor is "in" the screen or "on" the screen is totally beside the point.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:I started this thread to discuss the situation... not "advising people what to do in the stock market".
If it were a discussion, of course that would not be a problem...
... but if you look at his attitude, he starts of by attacking me... ditto Gazelle.
If they think that they are so smart, let them be... all I need to do is to point out how stupid they are with good examples and evidence of their stupidity....
There is no need for me to enlighten them...
You look at Chin Eng... did he say, "hmmm why did you use "in the line" instead of "on the line" ? ... I think "on" is more appropriate".
No he said "hahaha call yourself a writer and you use "in" instead of "on""
Of course I will attack him (and CX) for being too stupid to see that the mouse cursor is "in" and not "on" the computer screen image.
As for yourself... "soul_rage", I do not like to discuss anything with you because you are willing to come to conclusions even when there is no evidence for something.... how to talk to people like you?
You expect people to accept your beliefs. How to accept what you say at face value when you are not the son of god or a reincarnation of somebody.
It is a very big problem that you have but you refuse to acknowledge it.
The point that everyone has been trying to make here is that its not that your views are not welcomed but that your abusive attacks on pple who are making their views known through the same channels that you are using is really uncalled for.
U claim to be an educated professional but your approach to a discussion is no better than a cyber-thug, flaming, trolling and insulting pple.
So please... Keep it professional and the courtesy will be reciprocated. Opinions are like @ss-holes. Everybody has one and we're all entitled our views.