Singapore petrol is still the cheapest in the world?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Maurzio13, seems like many people (including your sissy sidekick) here believe your S$1.50 per litre korean petrol is bullshit. Do you have anything to say?
We replied merely to make this kid happy, and now he's strutting around
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Well, I presume you have read through the whole thread and totally believe in TS's argument that one should make a judgement before having seen the evidences and sources of both sides
Yes or no?
Well, I presume you have read through the whole thread and totally believe in TS's argument that one should make a judgement before having seen the evidences and sources of both sides
Yes or no?
To answer you - Yes, and of course.
But the fact that you claim TS is 'spouting rubbish' would have me believe you agree with M13. Yet now you say 'no' to TS queries. No worries, i care not a hoot what you believe anyway. It only shows me where your rationality and logic lies in.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
You mean you can't see I posted my edit more than 3 hours before you posted (29th June 9.10 pm vs your 30th June 12.52 am)? Ya, I guess your P6 cousin can really do better than you in reading the time difference. Don't act more stupid than before.
And you seem even more stupid by copying the PPP definition from wiki with totally no analysis and understanding on your part why it could or could not be used. If it was, as you had copied, difficult to compare due to differences in the quality of goods and services, what makes you think you can even start a thread on the comparison of petrol prices between Singapore and other developed countries? Any comparisons wouldn't make much sense in your opinion, and thus rendering your whole thread invalid and insensible.
Please be make more sense in your posts, and don't behave worse than your P6 cousin.
Flying frog, you mean it took you 72 hours and countless attempts of glorifyng your "brilliant" little formula (despite of others trying to ignore you) to realize that you have made an elementary mistake which a P6 kids would have noticed?
It is really funny that after making so many stupid blunders for yourself, you still have the guts to even try to discredit the information found in wiki. Are you trying to tell us that your “CONCLUSION” which you derived from 2 stupid equations, with wrong data, is more credible?
If you have the substance (I honestly don’t think so) to show us that wiki’s information about PPP is flawed, can you please show it to us instead of blowing your own little irritating trumpet over and over again?
Somehow, I think your buddy Maurizio, who didn’t even claimed to be a scholar, is even smarter than you. Have you realized that despite of me repeatedly asking him to comment on your conclusion, he has chosen not to comment (maybe he doesnt have the heart to embarrass you)
As I have told you that many people here are not interested in engaging in any serious discussion with you (for obvious reasons). Hence I think you should take my advice to shut the fxxx up and go find yourself someone of same caliber to play with.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Well, I presume you have read through the whole thread and totally believe in TS's argument that one should make a judgement before having seen the evidences and sources of both sides
Yes or no?
To answer you - Yes, and of course.
But the fact that you claim TS is 'spouting rubbish' would have me believe you agree with M13. Yet now you say 'no' to TS queries. No worries, i care not a hoot what you believe anyway. It only shows me where your rationality and logic lies in.
You make totally no logic.
Does TS having spouted rubbish got anything to do with what M13 has posted?
It really shows me where your rationality and logic lies; both statements are independent events.
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Flying frog, you mean it took you 72 hours and countless attempts of glorifyng your "brilliant" little formula (despite of others trying to ignore you) to realize that you have made an elementary mistake which a P6 kids would have noticed?
It is really funny that after making so many stupid blunders for yourself, you still have the guts to even try to discredit the information found in wiki. Are you trying to tell us that your “CONCLUSION” which you derived from 2 stupid equations, with wrong data, is more credible?
If you have the substance (I honestly don’t think so) to show us that wiki’s information about PPP is flawed, can you please show it to us instead of blowing your own little irritating trumpet over and over again?
Somehow, I think your buddy Maurizio, who didn’t even claimed to be a scholar, is even smarter than you. Have you realized that despite of me repeatedly asking him to comment on your conclusion, he has chosen not to comment (maybe he doesnt have the heart to embarrass you)
As I have told you that many people here are not interested in engaging in any serious discussion with you (for obvious reasons). Hence I think you should take my advice to shut the fxxx up and go find yourself someone of same caliber to play with.
Wow
The Gazelle tactic of copying wholesale previous posts just to evade away from posting the article
No idea why you like to consistently put words in my mouth
As usual, prove it. Which statement did I make that wiki is flawed?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Tell me am I correct that the $2.40 per L petrol you claimed was selling at Punggol Shell is V-Power?LOL? I hope you are laughing at yourself.
http://www.sgcarmart.com/news/article.php?AID=1204 so is this one?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
We replied merely to make this kid happy, and now he's strutting around
I am not very good at reading between the lines. Can someone please tell me what exactly is Eagle trying to say? -
Originally posted by eagle:
You make totally no logic.
Does TS having spouted rubbish got anything to do with what M13 has posted?
It really shows me where your rationality and logic lies; both statements are independent events.
of course not logic to you. You who doesnt even know what logic is in the first place.
If you had been rational, you would have waited for the TS's evidence, or find it out for yourself, yet you choose to insult him first, not once, but continually. Where's the rationality and logic in that? But then, that's the way you chosed to present yourself. It's your life, but thanks for showing it here so that i know of what calibre you are.
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
I am not very good at reading between the lines. Can someone please tell me what exactly is Eagle trying to say?No worries
i have not followed the rebuttal put forth by M13 closely to agree/disagree, but if you must have an answer, take it as a `NO', just to make you slightly happier.
I shall pacify this autistic kid and make you happier.
Answer: No -
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
I am not very good at reading between the lines. Can someone please tell me what exactly is Eagle trying to say?i think he is saying that you are a written off, dumbfuck who couldn't substantiate what you said/wrote and has to resort to some fuck-up rhetorics to wriggle your way out of some dork situation you got yourself in.
that's what i think he's trying to say.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
of course not logic to you. You who doesnt even know what logic is in the first place.
If you had been rational, you would have waited for the TS's evidence, yet you choose to insult him first, not once, but continually. Where's the rationality and logic in that? But then, that's the way you chosed to present yourself. It's your life, but thanks for showing it here so that i know of what calibre you are.
So I presume you have not read the last post in the previous page to understand why TS is spouting rubbish.
http://www.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/322185?page=14
No worries about showing anything. You can poll the rest of the forumers to judge. Dare you?
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
of course not logic to you. You who doesnt even know what logic is in the first place.
If you had been rational, you would have waited for the TS's evidence, yet you choose to insult him first, not once, but continually. Where's the rationality and logic in that? But then, that's the way you chosed to present yourself. It's your life, but thanks for showing it here so that i know of what calibre you are.
Maurizio13 quoted the below article and claimed that the Koreans are paying S$1.50 per litre for their petrol. What many people didnt realised is that this article is meant for the US military service and the price quoted in there are meant for US military usage only and thats why they are quoted in gallon instead of litrehttp://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=62916&archive=true
Time and time again, we are seeing blind leading the blind. Thats so typical in this forum
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Maurizio13 quoted the below article and claimed that the Koreans are paying S$1.50 per litre for their petrol. What many people didnt realised is that this article is meant for the US military service and the price quoted in there are meant for US military usage only and thats why they are quoted in gallon instead of litrehttp://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=62916&archive=true
Time and time again, we are seeing blind leading the blind. Thats so typical in this forum
So where's your korean article
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
http://www.sgcarmart.com/news/article.php?AID=1204 so is this one?
This is wrong article? o.O -
Originally posted by eagle:
So where's your korean article
I dont entertain spineless cowards like you. So please stop talking to me.
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
This is wrong article? o.O
Tell me if the S$2.40 L petrol you claimed was selling at punggol Shell station was V-Power? -
Originally posted by redDUST:
i think he is saying that you are a written off, dumbfuck who couldn't substantiate what you said/wrote and has to resort to some fuck-up rhetorics to wriggle your way out of some dork situation you got yourself in.
that's what i think he's trying to say.
Maybe you are just as dumb as Eagle, however I must give credit to your slightly bigger balls. -
Tsk tsk, once u answer my question u will know the answer to your question isnt it?
-
yawns
TS continues to live in self-denial
He's still telling everyone that he's right and everyone else is wrong
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
Tsk tsk, once u answer my question u will know the answer to your question isnt it?
Tsk Tsk, once you answer my question, I dont need to answer your question isnt it?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Tsk Tsk, once you answer my question, I dont need to answer your question isnt it?
The whole thing start from mi asking u question and u keep avoiding it till now? No? -
Originally posted by eagle:
So I presume you have not read the last post in the previous page to understand why TS is spouting rubbish.
http://www.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/322185?page=14
No worries about showing anything. You can poll the rest of the forumers to judge. Dare you?
No worries about showing anything. You can poll the rest of the forumers to judge. Dare you?
No worries and yet you 'dare me' to conduct a poll? lol! I did say you have no logic and rationality. Do you think i care about what your gansters here say? Your numbers here and YOU mean nothing to me. It's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more. You are indeed a deluded fool not to realize that.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
No worries about showing anything. You can poll the rest of the forumers to judge. Dare you?
No worries and yet you 'dare me' to conduct a poll? lol! I did say you have no logic and rationality. Do you think i care about what your gansters here say? Your numbers here and YOU mean nothing to me. It's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more. You are indeed a deluded fool not to realize that.
Anything you say lor
I would also say you have no logic and rationality at all, especially if you are standing by TS's side after seeing his behaviour for the whole thread.
It's those who are silent, reading and observing that means more.
So you do think many of them believe in your logic even though none voiced out
Silently putting words into their mouths just to justify yourself eh
Deluded fool indeed -
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
1. If u dun, it speak alot huh?
2. LOL, DO u even know wat is the diff between V power and 95 but oh well nvm .. 95 isnt that cheap too.
1) Really, please tell me what difference does it make?
2) Yes I do, I know the difference between 95 and V-Power. So is the S$2.40 per litre petrol you claim was selling at Shell Puggol V-Power?
-
Originally posted by £ Ĭ €Ú°:
Maurzio13, seems like many people (including your sissy sidekick) here believe your S$1.50 per litre korean petrol is bullshit. Do you have anything to say?
How much oil does Taiwan produce? Or do they even produce crude oil at all.
The DPP's proposal has won the backing of ruling Kuomintang legislators. Chang Hsien-yao, a KMT caucus leader, pointed out that Taiwan does not produce oil, but has to rely on imports for all crude oil and gasoline products.
Either you are talking crap or the KMT caucus leader was talking crap.
Japan = SG$1.4385 per litre
(USD4.004 per US gallon, USD1 =SG$1.36, 1 US gallon = 3.78541 litres)
South Korea = SG$1.50 per litre
(USD4.189 per US gallon, USD1 = SG$1.36, 1 US gallon = 3.78541 litres)
Gas prices up 5 cents in S. Korea; Japan at $4
By Jennifer H. Svan, Stars and Stripes
Pacific edition, Saturday, June 21, 2008Gas prices at AAFES and NEX pumps on bases in Japan and Okinawa will top $4 a gallon for the first time Saturday, three weeks after South Korea and Guam surpassed the mark.
Midgrade unleaded gas in Japan and Okinawa will cost motorists $4.004 a gallon after midnight Friday, a jump of nearly five cents from the previous week, according to the Army and Air Force Exchange Service. Navy Exchange prices follow those set by AAFES.
Regular unleaded gas, meanwhile, continues to climb in South Korea and Guam, where prices Saturday were to rise 5 cents to $4.147 and $4.189 a gallon, respectively.
Premium unleaded also increases slightly, to $4.379 a gallon in South Korea, and $4.419 in Guam.
Diesel fuel, where sold, will remain unchanged across the board: $4.497 per gallon in Japan and Okinawa, and $4.757 in South Korea.
At Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, where Marine Corps Community Services controls gasoline sales, the price remains at $3.47 per gallon for unleaded. The price has been unchanged since December.
The record prices at AAFES and NEX pumps mirror stateside trends. The U.S. average retail price for regular gasoline rose for the twelfth consecutive week, up 4.3 cents a gallon to $4.082, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Taiwan = SG$1.51 per litre (USD 1 = SGD1.36)
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific_business/view/350428/1/.html