And ya... I have no idea why you think you 'getting wind of information' could be a more reliable info than what was being observed.
The fact is, no one has any statistic data to prove either way. As said u observe some foreigners being recruited doesn't have much sway since it is... well... not statistically significant. About the gov reduction of scholarship to foreigners, it is a sign of trying to save money. In a way the gov can create job by hiring more people as civil servants. Second, although they can only come out a few years later, it is hard to see wat is it like in the future. Maybe they need more people, maybe they need less. Who knows ?
It is about the precise timing of raising taxes just before the economic downturn. I'm saying that this economic downturn was sort of expected.
Is not really expected. No one expect it to be tat bad. The biggest factor is the housing sub prime which has been going for many years, the unexpected increase in oil price and also commodities. I didn't expect it. If I do I would have spent all my saving on buying crude oil a year earlier.
Well, if the government has nothing to gain from finding excessive foreigners, then maybe you could attempt to explain my observations that I have told you about.
I see it in another way. If the gov had nothing to gain, and they r not stupid, then wat u observe is not really the sign tat represent the whole society.
Singapore look up to foreigner as talent or in return the citizen citizen either work abroad or migrate to gain the same status.. For example, my friend was offered $1,600 for to start as nurse in sg, however UAE offered him US$4,000 , excluding allowance (take note that the package include accomdation as well as transport). A simple will show the huge difference , The annual income for working in sg will be estimated about $35,000 whilst, working in UAE is US$60,000 per annual... so which one will you choose?
Originally posted by stupidissmart:The fact is, no one has any statistic data to prove either way. As said u observe some foreigners being recruited doesn't have much sway since it is... well... not statistically significant. About the gov reduction of scholarship to foreigners, it is a sign of trying to save money. In a way the gov can create job by hiring more people as civil servants. Second, although they can only come out a few years later, it is hard to see wat is it like in the future. Maybe they need more people, maybe they need less. Who knows ?
Is not really expected. No one expect it to be tat bad. The biggest factor is the housing sub prime which has been going for many years, the unexpected increase in oil price and also commodities. I didn't expect it. If I do I would have spent all my saving on buying crude oil a year earlier.
I see it in another way. If the gov had nothing to gain, and they r not stupid, then wat u observe is not really the sign tat represent the whole society.
The fact is, no one has any statistic data to prove either way. As said u observe some foreigners being recruited doesn't have much sway since it is... well... not statistically significant. About the gov reduction of scholarship to foreigners, it is a sign of trying to save money. In a way the gov can create job by hiring more people as civil servants. Second, although they can only come out a few years later, it is hard to see wat is it like in the future. Maybe they need more people, maybe they need less. Who knows ?
I believe to explain it is a sign of trying to save money is incorrect. If it is true, the most probable reasons I can come up with is
1) they are really sensitive to the population's demand for less foreigners
2) they want to slow down the population growth
3) they are really bad planners,
Is not really expected. No one expect it to be tat bad. The biggest factor is the housing sub prime which has been going for many years, the unexpected increase in oil price and also commodities. I didn't expect it. If I do I would have spent all my saving on buying crude oil a year earlier.
Everyone knows that economies go in cycles, a major one almost every 10 years (some say 5). Look back the years. I believed there were also major recessions around 1968, 1978, 1988, 1998. From the period of 1997/1998 economic crisis, be it 5 or 10 years cycle, both point to the year 2008. In that sense, it can be rather expected.
That was the main reason I searched so hard for a job way before I graduated, because I know I will be graduating in 2008. I believed I have already stated this reason quite long ago in this forum.
I see it in another way. If the gov had nothing to gain, and they r not stupid, then wat u observe is not really the sign tat represent the whole society.
I have already told you that it is not only what I observed; my friends observed the same thing. This is however excluding GLCs and govt agencies.
Before this, you told me you believed the unemployment situation is controlled, and used outdated articles to prove your point. Then the newspaper showed otherwise. Now you are telling me that it is not representative of the whole society. I have no idea why you would like to persist in what you believe than accept or attempt to explain away what was observed. It's not like you have concrete and updated statistics to state your points.
Now, you do not even bother to explain the observations to convince, but rather, brush away it as not representative. This is similar behaviour to you brushing away what I said about some foreigner being rude. Ironically, it is you who later questioned me why I defended M13 for being rude when you have done that yourself in the first place.
I believe to explain it is a sign of trying to save money is incorrect. If it is true, the most probable reasons I can come up with is
1) they are really sensitive to the population's demand for less foreigners
2) they want to slow down the population growth
3) they are really bad planners,
Frankly speaking, I think to save money is probably the real reason. How they r gonna spend the saved money is the real question
Everyone knows that economies go in cycles, a major one almost every 10 years (some say 5). Look back the years. I believed there were also major recessions around 1968, 1978, 1988, 1998. From the period of 1997/1998 economic crisis, be it 5 or 10 years cycle, both point to the year 2008. In that sense, it can be rather expected.
Wat u proposed is not really based on hard evidence but based on guess work. 1997 is the asian fiancial crisis but 2007 is a very good year for asia where straits index breaks record high. Just face it, no one realy know wat is gonna happened to the stock and share a year later. Even if u ask experts, they can come out with completely different prediction. Can u predict wat is the stock market like at 2009 ? Wat will the market be like in US at end 2009 ? Wat will the price of fuel be like at end 2009 ?
That was the main reason I searched so hard for a job way before I graduated, because I know I will be graduating in 2008. I believed I have already stated this reason quite long ago in this forum.
U started to find job only in 2008 right...
Before this, you told me you believed the unemployment situation is controlled, and used outdated articles to prove your point. Then the newspaper showed otherwise. Now you are telling me that it is not representative of the whole society.
Before tis, I also told u tat the employment history of singapore has to be taken into account because foreign talent is not a 2008 phenomenon. Showing statistic on last year is a good evidence of the need for FT to grow the economy. Now the market is slowing, but realistically speaking it is still acceptable at 2.3%. If u look at other countries in the region, it is about 50% higher than singapore
This is similar behaviour to you brushing away what I said about some foreigner being rude. Ironically, it is you who later questioned me why I defended M13 for being rude when you have done that yourself in the first place.
The foreigner is rude because u think she give u a "look". Lets put it tis way. "Look" is very mild. When people complain of rudeness, it is about the things they said, or the gesture they perform then it is really taken seriously. Even if u r in the service line, a customer complaining of u giving them the "look" is taken mildly. When people give u a look, u just look them back and tat is it.
When M13 specifically called me stupid, thought processes having problem, report writing is complete rubbish and many others, u find it not rude. Don't u find yourself having double standards ? If a salesgirl, your girlfriend, your supervisor or even your supervisor say tat to u, it is rude. And then u go around trying to defend people calling people stupid and writing as rubbish etc . Now tat is really going past the limit
If a teacher says tat the above to u, he can be sacked. If a policeman say tat to u, your complaint can make him suspend his duty and work on behind the scene for some time. If u complaint a policeman or a teacher giving u the "look", they just tell u to be more tolerable and perhaps tell the teacher/policeman to be more careful next time.
Lastly, I am never rude to your M13 friend prior to tis
Originally posted by stupidissmart:Frankly speaking, I think to save money is probably the real reason. How they r gonna spend the saved money is the real question
Wat u proposed is not really based on hard evidence but based on guess work. 1997 is the asian fiancial crisis but 2007 is a very good year for asia where straits index breaks record high. Just face it, no one realy know wat is gonna happened to the stock and share a year later. Even if u ask experts, they can come out with completely different prediction. Can u predict wat is the stock market like at 2009 ? Wat will the market be like in US at end 2009 ? Wat will the price of fuel be like at end 2009 ?
U started to find job only in 2008 right...
Before tis, I also told u tat the employment history of singapore has to be taken into account because foreign talent is not a 2008 phenomenon. Showing statistic on last year is a good evidence of the need for FT to grow the economy. Now the market is slowing, but realistically speaking it is still acceptable at 2.3%. If u look at other countries in the region, it is about 50% higher than singapore
The foreigner is rude because u think she give u a "look". Lets put it tis way. "Look" is very mild. When people complain of rudeness, it is about the things they said, or the gesture they perform then it is really taken seriously. Even if u r in the service line, a customer complaining of u giving them the "look" is taken mildly. When people give u a look, u just look them back and tat is it.
When M13 specifically called me stupid, thought processes having problem, report writing is complete rubbish and many others, u find it not rude. Don't u find yourself having double standards ? If a salesgirl, your girlfriend, your supervisor or even your supervisor say tat to u, it is rude. And then u go around trying to defend people calling people stupid and writing as rubbish etc . Now tat is really going past the limit
If a teacher says tat the above to u, he can be sacked. If a policeman say tat to u, your complaint can make him suspend his duty and work on behind the scene for some time. If u complaint a policeman or a teacher giving u the "look", they just tell u to be more tolerable and perhaps tell the teacher/policeman to be more careful next time.
Lastly, I am never rude to your M13 friend prior to tis
Wat u proposed is not really based on hard evidence but based on guess work. 1997 is the asian fiancial crisis but 2007 is a very good year for asia where straits index breaks record high. Just face it, no one realy know wat is gonna happened to the stock and share a year later. Even if u ask experts, they can come out with completely different prediction. Can u predict wat is the stock market like at 2009 ? Wat will the market be like in US at end 2009 ? Wat will the price of fuel be like at end 2009 ?
Do you really need me to scan out my economics notes for you to show you that economy goes in cycles, a sinusoidal curve that goes on an upward path? This is not guesswork; it is stated in economic textbooks, etc.
Again, it is not about the price of fuel or the stock market or etc. It is about an economic downturn that can be predicted. If you ask me, there was at least one person who predicted an economic downturn in 2008/2009 in the year 2007, and it was published in the straits times.
I believe I mentioned about a year ago that I expected an economic downturn in 2008 somewhere in this forum.
U started to find job only in 2008 right...
No, I got it in 2005. And at the start of the first semester in year 4, semester 1 (that's June 2007), I went around telling my friends and my sis to find a job asap as there might likely be an economic downturn when we graduate. I gave them the same reason as I gave you. Quite a number do not believe me at that time.
I told them, we will either be just at the end of the good job market, or just missed it and be at the start of the recession.
This is not prediction; this is from the understanding of how economy cycles function.
Before tis, I also told u tat the employment history of singapore has to be taken into account because foreign talent is not a 2008 phenomenon. Showing statistic on last year is a good evidence of the need for FT to grow the economy. Now the market is slowing, but realistically speaking it is still acceptable at 2.3%. If u look at other countries in the region, it is about 50% higher than singapore
Fortunately our government is not as short-sighted as you. Are you seriously thinking that it will stop at 2.3%???? Somehow you like to constantly look at past events and pacify yourself that everything is well.
And I'm not one that compares much with other countries. If we have problems within our society, we look at in within, not compare with other countries and console ourselves that it is acceptable. Please don't be a 2nd lionnoisy
And finally, on FT wise, deathmaster made a valid point in the first post of this thread page:
http://www.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/325895?page=3
The foreigner is rude because u think she give u a "look". Lets put it tis way. "Look" is very mild. When people complain of rudeness, it is about the things they said, or the gesture they perform then it is really taken seriously. Even if u r in the service line, a customer complaining of u giving them the "look" is taken mildly. When people give u a look, u just look them back and tat is it.
When M13 specifically called me stupid, thought processes having problem, report writing is complete rubbish and many others, u find it not rude. Don't u find yourself having double standards ? If a salesgirl, your girlfriend, your supervisor or even your supervisor say tat to u, it is rude. And then u go around trying to defend people calling people stupid and writing as rubbish etc . Now tat is really going past the limit
If a teacher says tat the above to u, he can be sacked. If a policeman say tat to u, your complaint can make him suspend his duty and work on behind the scene for some time. If u complaint a policeman or a teacher giving u the "look", they just tell u to be more tolerable and perhaps tell the teacher/policeman to be more careful next time.
Lastly, I am never rude to your M13 friend prior to tis
1) I was never rude to the service person before this, and you are not there to witness what happened.
2) I'm here to witness what M13 said, and I believe we have discussed, and you have agreed, that calling you stupid is not rude because it is your nickname.
3) If your Christian name is stupid, there's nothing wrong for the teacher or policeman to call you "stupid".
4) Are you blaming others for telling you off for your poor English letter writing standards? Let me tell you there's no double standards here.
5) You have defended someone for so many posts a rude action which you have not even witness at all; there's a limit to word descriptions of rude actions. You merely brushed it away, yet when I defended M13 for his logical choice of words, you are telling me off? Aren't you being a hypocrite? Seems like you are the one who is practicing double standards here.
6) I have already mentioned. If you would like me to repost
Well, if I used a lousy standard of English in a report or an email that he has seen and received and sent to someone outside the company (without even informing him beforehand, but informing only after the act has been done, thus resulting in an inaccurate transfer of information), and that I make mistakes like calling tax avoidance as tax evasion, he's has all the right to do so.
Now, don't you think the sentence in bold perfectly reflects a rude action?
7) Finally, this is more so different because it is a virtual place. I shall repost again:
But if you want to say anything bad about me, do feel free. I'm serious. This is a forum, a virtual world afterall, and I don't bother with such trivial stuff. I'm here to discuss some politics, have entertainment, make cynic pokes at the government, and most importantly, to help and share with people if they have any queries in homework or in the areas of health and fitness, if I know the answer to. I believe you have seen me ignore any insults or anything, from the likes of Gazelle and clones.
And again, this is not even targetting supporters or anything. If you cannot even be consistent in what you have said and what you have done, how can you blame anyone else?
If you really can get so agitated and upset in this virtual world, I guess you should really mature more.
Now, any reasons why you are comparing real life events vs events and words used in this virtual place?
fifi rulz
Eh, eagle got a secret admirer. ![]()
Don't forget based on the last ERECTION result 66.6 % of SIngapore is happy with the garment.So I would really be shocked if the PAP keeps coming back stronger.Your vote is your voice so instead of complaning tell everybody you know to do the right thing and make SIngapore a better place for SIngaporeans so they dont have to migrate.
Originally posted by Short Ninja:Don't forget based on the last ERECTION result 66.6 % of SIngapore is happy with the garment.So I would really be shocked if the PAP keeps coming back stronger.Your vote is your voice so instead of complaning tell everybody you know to do the right thing and make SIngapore a better place for SIngaporeans so they dont have to migrate.
66.6% of those who could vote.
Not 66.6% of Singaporeans.
Big difference you know. ![]()
you know i woudn't say 66.6% (i'm not sure about the figure) was happy with the reigning party, but i'm quite certain out of their votes, a certain percentage belonged to an unconcerned group. a group who doesn't care about politics and voted for the incumbent because it had been 'the way' all along. and may i highlight, that there are even more reasons (than simply out of support) that voters went with the current gahmen, some beliefs like 'don't want trouble coz they will know' , housing values etc. so even though they may not support the incumbent, they will still vote for them due to other reasons. It is not easy for the opp to secure a win.. at least not without knowing there's still a huge percentage of the unconcerns out there. and i think they had done an excellent job on giving us 'a choice' last GE, because 'the concerns' were finally able to show their displeasures from the results of falling support rates across the island.
talking about us getting poorer? yes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BygOYrP722Y
Originally posted by charlize:
66.6% of those who could vote.
Not 66.6% of Singaporeans.
Big difference you know.
Ok lah so dont forget to vote for the right oppositon when you are 21>Hahaha
Originally posted by charlize:Eh, eagle got a secret admirer.
Aiyah, don't bother about that troll la
He's extremely sore at me because the last few times he wanted to do more 'personal attacks' on me and got his extreme childishness and autism exposed, he got banned.
Originally posted by eagle:Aiyah, don't bother about that troll la
He's extremely sore at me because the last few times he wanted to do more 'personal attacks' on me and got his extreme childishness and autism exposed, he got banned.
Gazelle again arh? haha he is just like a fly. He wont never go away no matter how you chase it away.
I really wonder why Fireice is so protective over Eagle. Maybe it is in Fireice interest to ensure that forummers here dont expose the horny desperate DARKSIDE of Eagle.
Since they are both in some sort of scam cum tuition business, I am sure parents will be worried if their tuitor is know to be someone who is always thinking of asking sexual favour from opposite sex.
Eagle, you have to thank your mother Fireice for giving you the protection and allowing you to sprout nonsense in this forum like a little spoilt brat.
Originally posted by O o O o:I really wonder why Fireice is so protective over Eagle. Maybe it is in Fireice interest to ensure that forummers here dont expose the horny desperate DARKSIDE of Eagle.
Since they are both in some sort of scam cum tuition business, I am sure parents will be worried if their tuitor is know to be someone who is always thinking of asking sexual favour from opposite sex.
Eagle, you have to thank your mother Fireice for giving you the protection and allowing you to sprout nonsense in this forum like a little spoilt brat.
You must be so deprived.... poor thing you.. What happened to your mom ? She ran away with another man when you're a baby?
It's ok... once you stop acting like an autistic jerk.. some deperate girls may actually take a second look at you.
Originally posted by Spartans:
Gazelle again arh? haha he is just like a fly. He wont never go away no matter how you chase it away.
this fly is impervious to insecticide ![]()
Originally posted by maurizio13:
this fly is impervious to insecticide
awww.. don't be so mean maurizio.. all he needs is some good ol fashion lovin...
Originally posted by jojobeach:You must be so deprived.... poor thing you.. What happened to your mom ? She ran away with another man when you're a baby?
It's ok... once you stop acting like an autistic jerk.. some deperate girls may actually take a second look at you.
What to do... Some trolls are sore because the moderatoress can't stand their childishness
34 year old indeed
Originally posted by eagle:What to do... Some trolls are sore because the moderatoress can't stand their childishness
34 year old indeed
somehow i don't think he is 34 y.o., i don't even behave this way when i was 16 y.o.
Originally posted by jojobeach:You must be so deprived.... poor thing you.. What happened to your mom ? She ran away with another man when you're a baby?
It's ok... once you stop acting like an autistic jerk.. some deperate girls may actually take a second look at you.
So JOJO, I guess I am right to say that you have been lying about your property investment in USA and thats the reason why you are avoiding the other thread which i was asking
Am I right to say that, you (JOJO BEACH) is claiming that in Singapore all property price will sink together and in USA the property market will not?
I am sure those forummers here who believed in you. will be very disappointed to know that I am right about you. You are simply a big liar blowing your own trumpet abot your property investment because until today, you are unable to demostrate to us that you have any BASIC knowlegde about property investment.
beyond by imagination? Yes indeed, I never imagine you could go as far as calling yourself multi-property investor when you are NONE..
KEKEKEKE....
Originally posted by eagle:What to do... Some trolls are sore because the moderatoress can't stand their childishness
34 year old indeed
I wonder who will dare to send their daughter to you for tuition when we know what you are always thinking of asking young girls for sexual activities. You on horny bastard!!! too much hormone isit? ![]()
Yawns
still acting like a autistic kid
Do continue. You are entertaining us ![]()
Originally posted by eagle:Yawns
still acting like a autistic kid
Do continue. You are entertaining us
Have you ever check out your female students and ask them for sexual activities?
I am sure over the past few years you must have learn quite a fair bit of tricks from BAR isnt it?
Anything more?
Do continue to entertain ![]()
Why are your posts getting shorter and shorter?
Originally posted by eagle:Anything more?
Do continue to entertain
Why are your posts getting shorter and shorter?
Maybe it's because he finds his points are no longer valid points, that's why he don't want to repeat them. ![]()