Originally posted by rainee:
Yea, that's what I mean, if the girl is not in a good and healthy relationship, then she would be better off with another guy. That why I said, if she is happily attached, shouldn't try to break up the r/s...

Say you are a third-party of a bad-relationship, does that makes the title 'third-party' any better, or technically makes the party involved feeling better? In an analogy, it seemed better to steal-from-the-rich and divide it among the poor, but does it means the crime has became something else other than theft?
Don't get me wrong, I am not saying that being a third-party equates to 'crime'.
I wholly support the idea of all is fair in love and war. I am just curious how people reason with themselves regarding 'Good' and 'Bad' relationship and how it seemed ok to enter into the picture using a third party title ONLY if your love is in a distressing relationship. Of course, often, some are downright obvious CMI, but there are the dubious kind - where the 'bad' isn't a bad, neither is the 'good' something good. So what do you do? Stagnation?
E.g. Your crush tells you that his bf is always neglecting her. In your opinion, he seemed like a bad bf. So under this assumption, one step into this damsel in distress, feeling completely reasonable. Say your crush loses the relationships and almost gotten a relationship with you, but just before that happens, she realise that that guy wanted to propose to her this coming week, working all his guts out to buy her a ring, thus neglecting her for the past few months.

We are just mindsets of our own preceptions.
When he/she is attached in non-marriage sense, that doesn't mean competitions ends there. Being attached, still means your options are open, JUST that you DON'T actively seek potential mates to settle in another BGR, because that would bring in complications.
Still my old saying,
a completely satisfied woman cannot be seduced. If he's a guy, then it depends on his wisdom. (Nature is such that biological genes want polygamy, spiritual love wants monogamy).

Cheers