Originally posted by FeowFeow:
MC,
No offence, but please don't become as inflexible as The Bear. True, in this instance, Pete has been insensitive to a genuine heartbreak problem, & the poster is obviously in distress.
However, No reason to persecute. Sometimes, a person means well by trying to joke, which The Bear can't seem to understand in my post in another thread. Their intention may be to lighten up the atmosphere. Sometimes it works (when the problem isn't that serious, & that person just wants to rant, like in the other thread), sometimes, it backfires (such as now). Heck, I've been real moody, but brightened up after someone jokes with me & makes me see the funny side to a problem.
Pete's replies, as I've mentioned, are definitely insensitive, & shouldn't be condoned, but it's Not like those bar clones whose intentions are downright questionable. Please go gentle : ) Mods in AA have my respect because they remind only when appropriate : )
FeowFeow
Originally posted by I_am_PeTe_Parker:
...I am not suggesting at all that Roxy may have being so unfortunate to have suffered the ignomity of being played out by her Bf...but on hindsight...I guess my post did sounded that way...
I was just trying to let her know guys cannot be trusted.
To Roxy...my sincere apologies. MC, you may edit as you deemed necessary

.
Originally posted by M©+square:
Cool! I'm fine if your explaination justify your post Just as long people understand your intention of the comment.
I have to agree with Bear and starpuppy that the post did sounded insensitive.
So i wish you could defend yourself before everyone else condemns you.You may leave it(that post) there if you think it's fine with ya?

Cheers
Dear FeowFeow,
No offence taken, I think you've missed the latter part of my post which states my intention.
I hope you read the reminding part of it.
While i agree with you, there are times when a thread truly needs someone who could just let the rest see the positive side of the problem. To turn sorrow into joy. Please do rest assure i enjoyed those times too.
No persecution at all. At least to me, it didn't seem like one.
I have seen Pete's contribution every now and then, those post were helpful and advises given in due respect to thread starter.
This sudden change in advise is something which i thought he should have at least explain what he meant rather than allowing Bear and Starpuppy and potential forumers to pounce on him and whack him out of the statement.
I see offended forumers, on my part. I just do not see it as a joke or cracking something light. I didn't understand that post to how it will help thread starter.
So with benefit of doubt, i approached to seek explaination, otherwise he should retrack his statement as a matured AA contributor.
I admit that i did sounded aggressive(which to me is firm). My apologies to Pete and others who have gotten the wrong impression of AA mods.
Pete is not a clone as far as i'm concerned.
My personal intention is to protect Pete from being condemned or flamed.
As far as i'm concerned.
His explaination is fair and no further persuation needed.
Cheers