job advice???
-
not in every case... it depends on wat the terms and conditions are.Originally posted by nightzip:Basically, IF it is in the terms and conditions in the contract, AND you signed it, THEN you and bound by it loh...simple.
-
like the termination of contract thing leh??? wat thing eg??
-
Keep an official proof of it. Do what wrong things deduct pay? Are you doing something closely related to finance?Originally posted by simpleger24:i starting to work no mood liao... somemore do wrong thing deduct pay leh -
Don't try to think any simple way out of this...Originally posted by simpleger24:like the termination of contract thing leh??? wat thing eg??
Unless like mentioned earlier, your employer's acts or terms & conditions are against the ministry's protection scheme and you're covered within.. There might not be an easy way out... Or if you manage somehow to blow a proportion out of the matter and it's covered by the media... Then perhaps people might be more bother with what you say.... -
am i correct to say that
once u are earning more than 1.6k per month, you are no longer protected under MOM's employment act already
your company has the right to do anything to you, even if your employment contract terms contravenes the MOM's employment act
employment act only covers lower income workmen -
This is the first time I see a contract where you must PAY the company IF they fire you..
-
in a way it is true.Originally posted by Edgar_Davids:am i correct to say that
once u are earning more than 1.6k per month, you are no longer protected under MOM's employment act already
your company has the right to do anything to you, even if your employment contract terms contravenes the MOM's employment act
employment act only covers lower income workmen
MOM actually favours the employer more than the employees. it is nothing new.
-
But I see a potential for abuse there... theoretically they can employ and fire people every 3 months... and having not to pay for them is like getting free labour!Originally posted by dragg:in a way it is true.
MOM actually favours the employer more than the employees. it is nothing new. 
-
it is obvious in this case that she is being exploited.Originally posted by DriftingGuy:But I see a potential for abuse there... theoretically they can employ and fire people every 3 months... and having not to pay for them is like getting free labour!
she has to check with MOM on the contract details to know if the employer has flouted the manpower law. unfortunately she has herself to blame for her carelessness. -
well.pay less den 1.2
-
contact-based jobs normally pay higher than normal.
-
er..my pay are lesser den lasttime