The public.Originally posted by viciouskitty74:okay...so if their postings do not help.
Who is there to regulate them?
WHat certifies you then??Originally posted by viciouskitty74:So are they allowed to post advices to the threadstarter or to the others forumers too.
And what certifies them to? because they are moderators, or because they do know better?
If its not the power to end or create lives, make tons of money at my whim and fancy, I don't need it.Originally posted by viciouskitty74:the power to close threads, banned and what else?
I am not sure about AA but in most sub-forums moderators do not have the authority to ban.Originally posted by viciouskitty74:the power to close threads, banned and what else?
My certificates as a public reading this forum and questioning the moderators capability as a moderator or a advisor. Did it offend your sensibility to have someone like a experienced moderator questioned?Originally posted by smudgey:WHat certifies you then??
you have to realise that in a forum like this.... everyone and anyone can post replies and advices... it is up to the TS to filter out what they think is good and crappy advices
what makes you think they know better??? they are just like any other forumites except that they have some additional 'duties'... They have been in AA for a number of years and hence gained some 'experiences'...
aye....couldnt agree more.Originally posted by ditzy:If its not the power to end or create lives, make tons of money at my whim and fancy, I don't need it.![]()
Originally posted by viciouskitty74:okay...so if their postings do not help.
Who is there to regulate them?
Which brings us back here:Originally posted by viciouskitty74:My certificates as a public reading this forum and questioning the moderators capability as a moderator or a advisor. Did it offend your sensibility to have someone like a experienced moderator questioned?
do you not question a doctor just because he is a doctor and his words must therefore be right? for all you know....his experiences is as a vet.
about the mods of AA not being certified counsellors.Originally posted by R3SsH|n:whats the big fuss about?
My issues are fueled by: you guys are supporting the moderator because they are moderators lah.Originally posted by Yunhaier:P.S: Devil/MCsquare got abuse power against you before meh? What's the thingy about moderators here?
Cheers
I'm just putting your qn about the certificates back to you...Originally posted by viciouskitty74:My certificates as a public reading this forum and questioning the moderators capability as a moderator or a advisor. Did it offend your sensibility to have someone like a experienced moderator questioned?
do you not question a doctor just because he is a doctor and his words must therefore be right? for all you know....his experiences is as a vet.
hanor hanor.... I also thinking....Originally posted by Yunhaier:The moderators here can only delete or lock topic. And this power only confines within the boundaries of Aunt Agony.
Only FireIce has the power to ban people.
P.S: Devil/MCsquare got abuse power against you before meh? What's the thingy about moderators here?![]()
Cheers
/raise handOriginally posted by Yunhaier:The moderators here can only delete or lock topic. And this power only confines within the boundaries of Aunt Agony.
Only FireIce has the power to ban people.
P.S: Devil/MCsquare got abuse power against you before meh? What's the thingy about moderators here?
Cheers
scold?Originally posted by mistyblue:/raise hand
I got scold people...![]()
![]()
![]()
OMG!!!! MURDER!!!Originally posted by R3SsH|n:scold?
i slaughtered TSs before...![]()
"Disguised" is a strong word to use. I don't think the moderators here are trying to disguise anything.Originally posted by viciouskitty74:My issues are fueled by: you guys are supporting the moderator because they are moderators lah.
But finally, a good question.
Answer: A image of authority, with not the necessary capability, nor the ability and self discipline; disguised as advises that did not help to alleviate the TS situation except to show 'knowledge'.
So technically, you are trying to say.Originally posted by smudgey:I'm just putting your qn about the certificates back to you...
When you go to a doctor.... do you really take his word for it base on his certifications???
when in doubt, you would seek for a second opinion right?
like-wise, if the TS doubts the advice he/she is given here, he/she will ask for other ppls opinion right?
bottom line. the moderator's advices are like any other forumite's advices... maybe they are given more credits simply because their advices are sound and reasonable...
for example,
If i were to identify myself with a problem stated in a thread here.... I personally will pay more attention to certain ppl's advices... for example Yunnie... simply because, in the past years, i have observed that she gives very sound advices...
no...regardless whether they mods or not, they did provide some valuable advices, so did most of the forumners...Originally posted by viciouskitty74:My issues are fueled by: you guys are supporting the moderator because they are moderators lah.
But finally, a good question.
Answer: A image of authority, with not the necessary capability, nor the ability and self discipline; disguised as advises that did not help to alleviate the TS situation except to show 'knowledge'.
Originally posted by viciouskitty74:My certificates as a public reading this forum and questioning the moderators capability as a moderator or a advisor. Did it offend your sensibility to have someone like a experienced moderator questioned?
do you not question a doctor just because he is a doctor and his words must therefore be right? for all you know....his experiences is as a vet.
sigh....Originally posted by viciouskitty74:So technically, you are trying to say.
The moderators here are as crappy as some of the forumites here when they choose to be. And should not be held accountable to their advises since they arent certified.
Soooo...when they turn personal instead of being fair, its okay because their majority posts was sound and reasonable which was copied from textbooks? Thus they have 2 different persona and its okay?
that a doctor treats pets using textbook cures, and can personally advise you which duck medication you should use to cure your dandruffs? But if it dont, then they are moderators, not accountable to their advises.
k....I need a shower....you guys keeps posting. be back to read it in a while.
let me sigh with you.Originally posted by smudgey:sigh....
you are being stubborn in your concept of moderators...
to what you said above.... YES. It's true. They Can. but WILL THEY??
Pls remember, that this is a PUBLIC forum... and they're additional roles are purely to help keep order...
whether you think their advices help or not is your personal opinion....
everyone here (or almost everyone here) try to help in their posts.... the advice they give may not be the perfect advice... or the perfect solution... but it is what in their advices...
are they accountable to their advices??
pls remember that they have been here for years, and if they have the tendercy to dish out crappy advices, then don't you think the forumers here will know better than to listen to the advices here or even to post their problems here?
Originally posted by viciouskitty74:So technically, you are trying to say.
The moderators here are as crappy as some of the forumites here when they choose to be. And should not be held accountable to their advises since they arent certified.
Soooo...when they turn personal instead of being fair, its okay because their majority posts was sound and reasonable which was copied from textbooks? Thus they have 2 different persona and its okay?
that a doctor treats pets using textbook cures, and can personally advise you which duck medication you should use to cure your dandruffs? But if it dont, then they are moderators, not accountable to their advises.
k....I need a shower....you guys keeps posting. be back to read it in a while.
thank you.Originally posted by Yunhaier:I get what you are driving at.
But as separate individual, I think we all have different 'brand' of advice. And this brand determines what we believe in and how we convey this belief in words here. Being personal or not, well, it depends on how you perceive it? I did employ harsh tactics quite a few occasions, but that was never meant to be personal - it was part of the belief I had?
And afterall, we all have different impression of people - same goes for nicks in forum. If you reckon that somebody is being personal or abusing authority, you can choose not to like him/her mah. It's perfectly fine. FI got fan clubs... but she got hate club also. It's like you can't please everybody too.
Everyone is accountable for their own advice here. Even the moderators. And everyone seeking advice are accountable for who are seek advice from.
The other thing is that, nobody here can provide cure. It has never been that way, other than an exchange of thoughts and viewpoint.
Cheers