New batch of SMRT Mercedes Benz Citaro have arrived!
-
As above.
The Citaros have already been seen at C&C, in red/white & black livery, just like how SMB136C was spotted when it first arrived into SG.
-
Continue from SMB136C's thread which has expired >http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/380964
-
How many of them came in?
-
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
How many of them came in?
Nine, some at Teban Gardens C&C and some at PSA (if I'm not wrong)
-
Current features spotted so far
> Longer side EDS
> Full length rear door (plug sliding it seems)
> red fabric seats and grey interior.
-
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
Current features spotted so far
> Longer side EDS
> Full length rear door (plug sliding it seems)
> red fabric seats and grey interior.
Seems SMRT wants to intergrate the bus & MRT experience together everywhere.
-
Isn't this topic being locked by the mod to avoid further trouble?
Why is all this not supposed to be leaked openly being leaked out again?
You all want to get other people into trouble again?
http://buses.sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/420450
Can the mods please do something before anything happens?
-
they don't want to listen after numerous locks at the risk of their jobs, i'm not going to take the responsibility for not locking every thread on this. let them take the consequences.
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
they don't want to listen after numerous locks at the risk of their jobs, i'm not going to take the responsibility for not locking every thread on this. let them take the consequences.
I never know that these people can be so irresponsible, other than behaving so badly in this forum.Even if so, they might just get other innocent parties or even other people outside this forum into trouble. Any information leaked in external sources means there is a bleach of sercurity of sensitive information.
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
they don't want to listen after numerous locks at the risk of their jobs, i'm not going to take the responsibility for not locking every thread on this. let them take the consequences.
Actually the last topic created by buses[IN]gapore! was fine. Only the topic created by muziq bus has problems.
-
You know what's 'trace back'?
And why are you even pointing that out?
Aren't you all just making this matter more glaring than it should be?
-
Hope the aircon's Konvekta lol
-
Originally posted by vicamour:
I never know that these people can be so irresponsible, other than behaving so badly in this forum.Even if so, they might just get other innocent parties or even other people outside this forum into trouble. Any information leaked in external sources means there is a bleach of sercurity of sensitive information.
because....TaoSuan wanna claim more victims.
-
Originally posted by dan474:
Actually the last topic created by buses[IN]gapore! was fine. Only the topic created by muziq bus has problems.
so busesingapore is trying to bring trouble for muziq bus by doing this, when the rest of us are trying to talk him out of trouble?
-
Let me ask everyone a question...
People spotted the bus on a public road or from a public road. They spotted it with their own eyes. Is it wrong to post it on here? Is there some kind of lockdown of information or something?
I know some people are stupid enough to leak information out and get themselves in hot soup, but I'm sure there's none of that happening in the present situation at hand. The vehicles were legally seen and were publicly viewable. Is there anything wrong with discussing it here?
-
Actually.
If face music one time, that shld do the trick.
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
Let me ask everyone a question...
People spotted the bus on a public road or from a public road. They spotted it with their own eyes. Is it wrong to post it on here? Is there some kind of lockdown of information or something?
I know some people are stupid enough to leak information out and get themselves in hot soup, but I'm sure there's none of that happening in the present situation at hand. The vehicles were legally seen and were publicly viewable. Is there anything wrong with discussing it here?
You are not wrong.But.
That's not how the corporate/govt world works.
I can tell you this much.
Why don't you give it a try and tell us? Even if it is technically not wrong, the attention you'll get is just not worth all these little leaks.
-
I went past C&C yesterday....
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
so busesingapore is trying to bring trouble for muziq bus by doing this, when the rest of us are trying to talk him out of trouble?
Seems that these people had never seen a Citaro in their whole life (where they already seen one for the demo by SMRT, which is still on service) and risk putting other people's ricebowls in trouble, where already threadstarter had been quite cautious when he started the previous thread.Originally posted by jayh272416:Let me ask everyone a question...
People spotted the bus on a public road or from a public road. They spotted it with their own eyes. Is it wrong to post it on here? Is there some kind of lockdown of information or something?
I know some people are stupid enough to leak information out and get themselves in hot soup, but I'm sure there's none of that happening in the present situation at hand. The vehicles were legally seen and were publicly viewable. Is there anything wrong with discussing it here?
Problem is that, they are not spotted on the public roads but in the dealer premises, which is supposed to be a highly secured area. And there are even pictures somemore in the premises, which is akin taking pictures in bus interchanges.Unless the person have the permission to post these pictures openly to the public.
-
Originally posted by vicamour:
Problem is that, they are not spotted on the public roads but in the dealer premises, which is supposed to be a highly secured area. And there are even pictures somemore in the premises, which is akin taking pictures in bus interchanges.
Unless the person have the permission to post these pictures openly to the public.
it's viewable to the public right?
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
it's viewable to the public right?
You want to try taking picture of RSAF aircraft taking off near (no need to be just outside) PLAB, TAB and posting here as an extreme example?What would it take to convince you of this?
Someone to get investigated?
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
it's viewable to the public right?
but they are not officially registered yet..
-
Originally posted by vicamour:
where already threadstarter had been quite cautious when he started the previous thread.Are you sure? Then why would he insist on such a thread and repost? Why try and push the boundary again? Shouldn't it be safe not sorry?
-
Originally posted by jayh272416:
it's viewable to the public right?
So you mean that it is ok to post bus interchange pictures in an open forum, subjected to scrunity of the enforcement forces?What will the staff of Pandan C&C think and do if they see these pictures as a bleach of their security of their highly protected premises, and not to mention, sensitive information regarded by them?
Originally posted by ghost79:Are you sure? Then why would he insist on such a thread and repost? Why try and push the boundary again? Shouldn't it be safe not sorry?
In the first place, he just mentioned he saw the buses in Pasir Panjang harbour but he did not dare to post any pictures. But he shouldn't have said too much about these buses, which cause many of these troublemakers go all the way to the dealer premises, secretly take pictures without permissions. Never mind, they even dare to post them in the open internet and said too much information about the buses, which is not even supposed to say out.
-
Originally posted by vicamour:
So you mean that it is ok to post bus interchange pictures in an open forum, subjected to scrunity of the enforcement forces?What will the staff of Pandan C&C think and do if they see these pictures as a bleach of their security of their highly protected premises, and not to mention, sensitive information regarded by them?
we're not even talking about pictures here. is it wrong to even have discussions about things we see?
If anyone has posted any pictures up, they jolly well take it down of their own accord. We do not owe them a living.
what about pictures that are already available on the public domain like this?
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh101/SBS7483U/SMRT%20O530%20demo/IMG_6489.jpg
