do u know that dar win theory will change over time?....they are already predicting what the future hold for us..most of us will be bald in the future or so they say..and also may have some new features or abilities previously inherent..in our eyes , what's percieved as attractive now may not be the same in the futureOriginally posted by ccrraappy:I would not say the girl is shallow or superficial. I am a firm believer of Darwin's theory about evolution - selective breeding amongst healthy beings. The girl you are talking about is just demostrating the natural primitive behaviour necessary for genetic survival in our world which has and will always be shaped by evolution of our human species.
Standing at 1.76m and weighing only 51 kg, I think you are in need of some mass gaining to look better. Your height is fine and mass can be gain through very traditional and common methods of eating and exercising.
Unlike me, only 1.67m and 60 kg, there are really hardly any easy methods for me to be nearer to the sky.
So if after reading this and you are still feeling sore over your failed attempt at finding a mate, then you are a weak-minded loser who does not qualify to compete in the evolution race. So start working out from today onwards.
Yea, I fully agree with the idea that what is attractive now may not be in the future. A good example to cite would be the the image of attractive ladies during the Tang Dynasty. During the Tang Dynasty, plump women signifies fertility and thus implies healthy offsprings, however, at our age, attractive has been redefined by new criterias and standards.Originally posted by Bollywood_Beng:do u know that dar win theory will change over time?....they are already predicting what the future hold for us..most of us will be bald in the future or so they say..and also may have some new features or abilities previously inherent..in our eyes , what's percieved as attractive now may not be the same in the future