Illegal to use rear sunblind.?

• tomsss

  30 May 07, 20:28

  Originally posted by Anti_AhSiah:

  This refer to the sticker type dumb ass. Those that people stick on the front or sometimes rear windscreen. I am talking about the automated ones.
  
  So dont teach me what you dont know.
  
  

  while i may agree with some of your points of view, i certainly do not appreciate your name-calling antics. i'm simply pointing out some facts found online only to see your comments on it, and "dumb ass" comes off from you. Someone was cautioning you about accusations, you took it as a threat. what is it are you trying to show?
  
  Yes, its through my own observations that i found that the number of vans driving with sunshades on the rear while driving has gone down, compared to previous years. Logically thinking, what do you think is the cause of that downfall in numbers? can't be the increasing cost of shades right? And again, i am only sharing my views, with my observations to bring out my point. Is it wrong to do that? What's a forum for?
  
  And for your "Besides, it is not opaque and will not obscure your view being semi transparent"... is not the case for every driver on the road.
  
  
• Anti_AhSiah

  30 May 07, 21:58

  Whilst u do not appreciate name callings, I certainly do not appreciate your conveniently coined 'LOOSE CANNON OF RUBBISH'.
  We are equal now.
  
  

  Originally posted by tomsss:

  while i may agree with some of your points of view, i certainly do not appreciate your name-calling antics. i'm simply pointing out some facts found online only to see your comments on it, and "dumb ass" comes off from you. Someone was cautioning you about accusations, you took it as a threat. what is it are you trying to show?
  
  Yes, its through my own observations that i found that the number of vans driving with sunshades on the rear while driving has gone down, compared to previous years. Logically thinking, what do you think is the cause of that downfall in numbers? can't be the increasing cost of shades right? And again, i am only sharing my views, with my observations to bring out my point. Is it wrong to do that? What's a forum for?
  
  And for your "Besides, it is not opaque and will not obscure your view being semi transparent"... is not the case for every driver on the road.
  
  

• Vigelic

  3 Jun 07, 23:26

  Originally posted by sir_boris:

  why compare van with a car. van got 60km/h sticker a car want it?

  wads the diff between a van and a hatchback? heck there are also privately registered vans (Sxx xxxx x)
  
  i'm talking about those vans, in front seat driver + 1, then behind the driver is maybe a grill net kind of thing, then at the back got glass most of the time even got demister..
  
  compare that with a hatchback / mpv.. wads the diff? plus also some of those vans that are like that are registered under private cars instead of goods vehicles..
  
  and also, wad if i dont drive on the xpressway? my "car" and the "van" will haf no diff.. the speed limit is 70kmh maximum.
  
  in other words.. why van can car cannot when there shld b no diff? wanna penalise go penalise the vans first.. they are more dangerous imo. since they block the glass with their GOODS and sometimes hide people inside when they nv apply for carrying pax in goods vehicle etc..
  
  some sunblinds put already still can see the back except obscure a bit.. so vans are still more etc.
  
  especially since a lorry recently just reversed into a boy at simei mrt.. -_-