That is why I was surprised he made it across WDL customs without a valid passport.Originally posted by Honeybunz:Impounded? Ok. Didn't recall correctly.![]()
maybe a stolen passport? If that's the case, the officer is in deep deep trouble.... Probably got caned by his superior liao.Originally posted by iveco:That is why I was surprised he made it across WDL customs without a valid passport.
Singapore or overseas immigration officials?Originally posted by Honeybunz:Anyway, the airport custom is a lot more careful. Whenever I go overseas, the custom will tell me to smile just to be sure I am the person in the passport photo (my passport photo got smile one).
both. Feel like a clown sometimes.Originally posted by iveco:Singapore or overseas immigration officials?
Originally posted by iveco:And that means Took Leng Hao will hang even if he is innocent and evidence clearing him shows up 10 years later.
Originally posted by Honeybunz:correct. He has to show that he wasn't at the scene of murder or must have solid evidence that he's paid to do that. etc
Solid evidence = written note, voice record etc.
Even if he's paid to do it, he will either get life sentence or death.
If he's really a scapegoat then he must have alibi. Otherwise, nobody can save him.
Originally posted by iveco:That's why I feel the full burden should be on the state to prove his guilt. If they can't do it, that is just too bad that the prosecutors are crap. Our system gives too much power to the prosecutors. They always win no matter how lousy they are.
It is my view that there is potential for a miscarriage of justice to happen anytime soon, and capital punishment should be abolished, or more people could be wrongly condemned to the gallows.
Originally posted by Honeybunz:Very hard for him to prove innocence cuz he is the one who knew where the body was hidden. Unless he could prove that someone else threw it down the hill instead of him. And also, he must prove that he didn't play any role in this whole thing.
Also the very fact that he ran into Malaysia is not doing him any good, regardless of what he claimed (the police tortured him until he got frightened etc).
Whatever he told his family about him being innocent is also useless. He cannot use this as evidence.
Moreover, what the prosecutors gathered has been a disadvantage to him. Witnesses saw him talking to her on the night she was missing. But nobody saw her walking away from him after they talked (He claimed that he only told her to go home and gave her two mangoes).
Hey, let's talk about this in Huang Na's topic or open a new topic leh.![]()
Then he has to provide info on:Originally posted by iveco:That guy is just a body disposal person. I doubt he has any blood on his hands. The real murderer could be miles away.
This is really a tough case for the defence lawyer. I would say 99.9% lose. He will only win if he can find that 0.1%. But then if he wins, he will so very famous liao and his career will fly like rocketOriginally posted by Honeybunz:Said TookÂ’s lawyer Subhas Anandan, "I think it's going to be a tough case, but we're going to do the best we can. We are not at liberty to say what our defence is. We have certain things to go on and we'll be expanding and exploring further possibilities of our defence."
This may include interviewing potential witnesses in Penang to strengthen their case. - CNA /ct
Mebbe he is using the Access Card to clear the customs. Can someone confirm whether the passport is still checked at the counter if a person managed to get pass the automated lane using the Access Card?Originally posted by iveco:That is why I was surprised he made it across WDL customs without a valid passport.
She was arrested for immigration offences. THe same goes for her first husband. Her second husband has a robbery & kidnap conviction.Originally posted by av98m:I found Huang Na's mother suspicious right from the beginning(before the details from her past showed up). She very obviously lied about her age!
he has been in the limelight for quite a number of high profile criminal cases. you should watch criminal lawyers when they are cross-examining the witnesses, its more fun.Originally posted by Honeybunz:I would love to see how the defence lawyer is going to present this case. I heard it's one top lawyer for criminal law.
I would love to watch thatOriginally posted by JLennon:he has been in the limelight for quite a number of high profile criminal cases. you should watch criminal lawyers when they are cross-examining the witnesses, its more fun.
It was the drug addicts' own fault that they died. Who asked them to consume illicit substances? The demand for drugs created a niche market that the mafia moved in to monopolise. Also, many of their runners were desperate men needing a quick buck.Originally posted by OldAhPek:Those drug lords, mafia directly/indirectly killed so many ppl
still gone scotfree....
yeah.. was at supreme court today....Originally posted by Honeybunz:Court hearing opened today!