"SINGAPORE: The government expects the Board of the National Kidney Foundation to do the "right thing" and win back public trust, says Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports Dr Vivian Balakrishnan.Originally posted by Farmer Brown:The Government starts to speak.
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/157883/1/.html
Dr Bala does a Russel Peters and asks NKF to "Do the right thing". What... is.. "the right thing"?!
good. now the no who cancel GIRO is 4500 liao...Originally posted by T_T Durai:http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/free/story/0,6418,328403,00.html?
click on "Click here to read the July 11 court transcript (AM)"
my interesting conversation with Babu Singh
a more accurate versoin of what the rest have previously posted
they are trying to make things complicated so that ppl can't opposed...or rather they dunnoe where to start to oppose...Originally posted by Cindyfeh:"SINGAPORE: The government expects the Board of the National Kidney Foundation to do the "right thing" and win back public trust, says Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports Dr Vivian Balakrishnan.
This includes looking at the issue in a dispassionate way and instituting changes to strengthen the organisation, making it something the public is comfortable with in the long term, said Dr Balakrishnan. "
Minimum clarity... as usual.
Can't they talk in simple kopitiam-level language so that all can understand?
thats why they are called politicians.Originally posted by Cindyfeh:"SINGAPORE: The government expects the Board of the National Kidney Foundation to do the "right thing" and win back public trust, says Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports Dr Vivian Balakrishnan.
This includes looking at the issue in a dispassionate way and instituting changes to strengthen the organisation, making it something the public is comfortable with in the long term, said Dr Balakrishnan. "
Minimum clarity... as usual.
Can't they talk in simple kopitiam-level language so that all can understand?
From that website:Originally posted by T_T Durai:http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/free/story/0,6418,328403,00.html?
click on "Click here to read the July 11 court transcript (AM)"
my interesting conversation with Babu Singh
a more accurate versoin of what the rest have previously posted
Originally posted by Cindyfeh:From that website:
Mr Khaw, who had spoken in support of the NKF when it maintained that three years was how long its reserves would last, had this advice for the NKF yesterday: 'If there was bad judgment, then acknowledge it and move on.'
I will keep this article, laminate it and show it to my boss when I make a mistake in my job.
Me: No, we would not have sued if not for the six paragraphs. When you sue, you have to look at it in the context of the entire article, because the other paragraphs are there. You just cannot sue because Â… you are suing for the meaning of the six paragraphs. But the other paragraphs are there in the particular article.what is the meaning of innuendo?
Singh: Let us not waste time. Let me go back to paragraph 8 of your affidavit of evidence-in-chief.
Me: Yes.
Singh: Let me read again what you said, so that there is no misunderstanding. I remind you that this is your evidence. The second sentence of paragraph 8 reads: "The first six paragraphs of the article had no connection or relevance with the main article.'' In other words, you are saying the first six paragraphs have nothing to do with the rest of the article, and the rest of the article has nothing to do with the first six paragraphs. But that is a position which is completely different from paragraph 8 of your statement of claim, where you say to understand the first six paragraphs, you need to look at the entire article.
Me: By way of innuendo.

Originally posted by Cindyfeh:From that website:
Mr Khaw, who had spoken in support of the NKF when it maintained that three years was how long its reserves would last, had this advice for the NKF yesterday: 'If there was bad judgment, then acknowledge it and move on.'
I will keep this article, laminate it and show it to my boss when I make a mistake in my job.
wa Khaw another farking insensitve statement. knnOriginally posted by Cindyfeh:From that website:
Mr Khaw, who had spoken in support of the NKF when it maintained that three years was how long its reserves would last, had this advice for the NKF yesterday: 'If there was bad judgment, then acknowledge it and move on.'
I will keep this article, laminate it and show it to my boss when I make a mistake in my job.
If im correct , Principal only earn about 1/5 of $50,000 a month which is Durai's pay + bonusesOriginally posted by Lethargic@@:...even principle is furious liao...tsk tsk tsk
BabuSingh : I am giving you one more chance to answer this question. You can say "yes'' or "no'', but if you want to say why again, please do so. Have you not again shifted on meaning?
tt's y they buai song...Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:If im correct , Principal only earn about 1/5 of $50,000 a month which is Durai's pay + bonuses
i suspect tonite's donation is even higher!Originally posted by leddy:Come on people!!! Seriously!!!! Who is not going to donate a single cent tonight????????? I'm going to bet my last dollar that tonight's collection is going to be really high!!! Record breaking callers....
If the blood running in those 900 NKF's staffs body still have a degree of warmness, they should start calling tonite and return part of their big fat bonues to the organisation.Originally posted by 798:i suspect tonite's donation is even higher!
Lets see how much can 900 NKF staffs doOriginally posted by Demolition:If the blood running in those 900 NKF's staffs body still have a degree of warmness, they should start calling tonite and return part of their big fat bonues to the organisation.