I can't fight. I am a woman. First I will run away, if cannot then surrender. If the enemy wins, I will work as a translator for them. My favorite department will be civil police. After war, I hope to eventually end up in the new union movement. Then at age of 70+, runs for president.Originally posted by ashtina82:wat if der's war in spore....wld u fight for ur country....![]()
if there's a war i'm not fighting for my countryOriginally posted by ashtina82:wat if der's war in spore....wld u fight for ur country....![]()
it's not a protest....n it's not an illegal gatherin too....Originally posted by the.raven:that is so retarded, what kind of protest is 4 people only.
It is obvious you don't appreciate the subtlety in their actions.Originally posted by the.raven:that is so retarded, what kind of protest is 4 people only.
oh was it national day recently?Originally posted by NEWater:You wanna know something, SMAP? I do feel the same way at times.
I didn't even bother to watch NDP, and that new song by the talentless duo whose names I didn't bother to catch just pissed me off on train stations (thank god they finally took the audio off. I was about to throw a stone at the LCD displays).
I agree that it's safe in this country, and thankful that unlike Oregon, I don't have to worry about some 13 year-old kid armed with a Kalashnikov rifle pointing it at me, but the price to pay in this kind of country is.... ridiculous.
5 years ago i'd say yes. the way things are degenerating into a dictatorship, well nobody really wanted to fight for Saddam did they?Originally posted by ashtina82:wat if der's war in spore....wld u fight for ur country....![]()
Reminds me of the debate that used to rage here.People will fight to save their lives and their land, not the establishment if its found that the latter has not done anything that is worth defending in the hearts and minds of the defenders.Originally posted by Finnz:The higher-ups did not make a blunder by sending in the riot police and its not that the police have nothing better to do.
Its clear what the higher-ups are trying to do, its intimidating at its best
all that wayang show is a stern warning to the others , they have ruled with the iron hand all this while and likely not to stop anywhere soon
what happen to our freedom of speech? what happen to democracy? 5 people consider riot?
Police? Protector of the people? protector of the gahmen?
The people makes up the country not the gahmen
If anyone wants to invade our homeland , i'll roll them the red carpet and take them on a tour to the parliament house
not 5. 4.Originally posted by Finnz:The higher-ups did not make a blunder by sending in the riot police and its not that the police have nothing better to do.
Its clear what the higher-ups are trying to do, its intimidating at its best
all that wayang show is a stern warning to the others , they have ruled with the iron hand all this while and likely not to stop anywhere soon
what happen to our freedom of speech? what happen to democracy? 5 people consider riot?
Police? Protector of the people? protector of the gahmen?
The people makes up the country not the gahmen
If anyone wants to invade our homeland , i'll roll them the red carpet and take them on a tour to the parliament house
Originally posted by caleb_chiang:Think gahmen and their family should stand in the frontline instead...![]()
When do we actually have freedom of speech??? It only applies in US... when you would see films like F.911 shown in theatre... In SG, it is an offence if you scold gahmen in public! Police is to arrest anyone who was heard in the public scolding gahmen....Originally posted by Finnz:what happen to our freedom of speech? what happen to democracy? 5 people consider riot?
Police? Protector of the people? protector of the gahmen?
The people makes up the country not the gahmen
If anyone wants to invade our homeland , i'll roll them the red carpet and take them on a tour to the parliament house
Well i think its a cock up. All the spf achieved was to attract criticism to itself and the govt, and to paint the SPF as the opressor of Singaporeans. I would have sent a couple of cops to disperse them, and it would have worked brilliantly; Singaporeans would probably go, 'CSJ Again! That clown!' as they did many times before.Originally posted by Finnz:The higher-ups did not make a blunder by sending in the riot police and its not that the police have nothing better to do.
Its clear what the higher-ups are trying to do, its intimidating at its best
all that wayang show is a stern warning to the others , they have ruled with the iron hand all this while and likely not to stop anywhere soon
upper then called "duet"??Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:for NDP
rui-en and taufik's voice doesn't match at all.
1 high pitch and low pitch
LMAO!! I dun think it's stern in any way...Originally posted by Finnz:all that wayang show is a stern warning to the others ,
next time they shd send groups of four to different locations simultaneously. the police will run of riot police to suppress the riots.Originally posted by BillyBong:It is obvious you don't appreciate the subtlety in their actions.
They were FULLY aware that a group of 5 or MORE constituted to outright RIOTING and would be subject to immediate arrest without question. With 4, the question became one of interpretation of the law.
And since they made no monkey chants and simply stood there in a silent protest, one can arguably claim that they were not DISTURBING THE PEACE as the officer-in-charge claimed.
This was exactly the kind of response they had hoped: an overkill attempt by the home team dispatched to subdue 4 mere citizens trying to spread a decent message to the public. It stinks of panic and mismanagement from the police force when 2-3 officers asking them to disband would have done the job.
With the live coverage from international reporters, they got the publicity they craved for and in so doing, indirectly sent a blunt signal to people around the world and singaporeans as whole: that SG represents a distorted democracy.