I need help...
-
You thought that I was the financial advisor?Originally posted by alexkusu:Wtf...i tot urgent..
got read textbook on Commercial Law by McGrawHill.
-
from my common sense, B is not liable.Originally posted by ^spidee^:Yea, just saw it.
The part about seeking a second opinion, I'm not so sure. Is that the key in this question? Cos accountant and financial adviser seem to be filling different roles.
Maybe if A seeked a second opinion from another financial adviser, and still went with B's advice, then he cannot sue?
undue influence does not apply here. -
i tot ur the losing money guy..since u do side businessOriginally posted by shade343:You thought that I was the financial advisor? -
thats what Im pondering about. Can the accountant's advise be considered a "second opinion" in this case? Accountants do not deal in shares>??Originally posted by ^spidee^:Yea, just saw it.
The part about seeking a second opinion, I'm not so sure. Is that the key in this question? Cos accountant and financial adviser seem to be filling different roles.
Maybe if A seeked a second opinion from another financial adviser, and still went with B's advice, then he cannot sue?
-
dun be trumphri yet, you'll be surprised by the power of GREY AREAS.Originally posted by alexkusu:yalor.. even a mass murderer can be found guilty. -
What about breach of duty of care? My lecturer say if you are ever the plaintiff, you should sue for everything that is applicable. Some compensation is better than none.Originally posted by Mr Fugue:from my common sense, B is not liable.
undue influence does not apply here. But maybe it doesn't apply to the question here... -
Originally posted by alexkusu:i tot ur the losing money guy..since u do side business I would have seek 2nd opinion from Investor Warren Buffet instead of an accountant.
-
I've alreadi given you the answer, the reasonings you think yrself since it's YOUR hw.Originally posted by shade343:thats what Im pondering about. Can the accountant's advise be considered a "second opinion" in this case? Accountants do not deal in shares>?? -
This questions happens to fall under the chapter of Duress, Undue Influence and Illegality.Originally posted by ^spidee^:What about breach of duty of care? My lecturer say if you are ever the plaintiff, you should sue for everything that is applicable. Some compensation is better than none. But maybe it doesn't apply to the question here... -
Thank you very much.Originally posted by Mr Fugue:I've alreadi given you the answer, the reasonings you think yrself since it's YOUR hw. 
-
you think the defendant's counsel kum gong one mehz???Originally posted by ^spidee^:What about breach of duty of care? My lecturer say if you are ever the plaintiff, you should sue for everything that is applicable. Some compensation is better than none. But maybe it doesn't apply to the question here...
as for the "some compensation" you mentioned, I dun think it's even enough to cover the legal costs incurred. such legal cases can carry on over years one. -
pls use your common sense if you have it.Originally posted by shade343:This questions happens to fall under the chapter of Duress, Undue Influence and Illegality. -
Anyway, law questions are easy..just name 2-5 consequent laws is enough liaw. Dont attend class also can pass. Thats why become lawyer is veli appealing
-
just name a few laws can liaoz?? can win case? so EASY???Originally posted by alexkusu:Anyway, law questions are easy..just name 2-5 consequent laws is enough liaw. Dont attend class also can pass. Thats why become lawyer is veli appealing
Wow!!!!!
then, can I just name the chapter and section lumber??? save my breath also.... -
yalor..just name one or two more laws more than the other party then can win. But need to have persuasive speech as well to persuade the jury. Thats why some lawyers take marketing courses.Originally posted by Mr Fugue:just name a few laws can liaoz?? can win case? so EASY???
Wow!!!!!
then, can I just name the chapter and section lumber??? save my breath also.... -
tell me, are you stll schooling in kindergarten??Originally posted by alexkusu:yalor..just name one or two more laws more that the other party then can win. But need to have persuasive speech as well to persuade the jury. Thats why some lawyers take marketing courses.
if you do, kor kor will forgive your ignorance. -
Couple of clarifications needed here and you'll get your answer to your question....
1)Is this really a financial adviser? and he collected fees for his service? and whats his scope of service, to advise on portfolio of investment to maximise returns? I havent heard of any financial adviser giving just one hot tip
2) The purchase was done by "A" based on a tip.
So A bears the risks I'm afraid.
Bottomline is there is seldom a hot-tip, and if you follow, be prepared to lose it, (ie, dont bet everything on it)
-
A did not pay any monies for the tip. But I suppose the advisor did charge a comission for helping to buy shares for him.Originally posted by achiever:Couple of clarifications needed here and you'll get your answer to your question....
1)Is this really a financial adviser? and he collected fees for his service? and whats his scope of service, to advise on portfolio of investment to maximise returns? I havent heard of any financial adviser giving just one hot tip
2) The purchase was done by "A" based on a tip.
So A bears the risks I'm afraid.
Bottomline is there is seldom a hot-tip, and if you follow, be prepared to lose it, (ie, dont bet everything on it) -
You supposed???Originally posted by shade343:A did not pay any monies for the tip. But I suppose the advisor did charge a comission for helping to buy shares for him.
It's your case, how come you dunno?? -
justice is blind. if there are many evidence against u, even tho ur really innocent, the court will find u guilty.Originally posted by Mr Fugue:tell me, are you stll schooling in kindergarten??
if you do, kor kor will forgive your ignorance. -
A + B = B + A