It is going to be different. No parents will want to send their children there, knowing that there is a "dirty" man there.Originally posted by Honeybunz:I don't think he was sacked for being gay.
It is more due to the fact that he was caught for indecent act in public.
You think if he had done it with a girl in public, it is going to be a difference?
You mean, the parents dun mind sending children to be taught by a teacher who is straight and has committed indecent act in public with a girl???Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:It is going to be different. No parents will want to send their children there, knowing that there is a "dirty" man there.
Similar in the sense that both are offences committed. He has bring down the moral integrity of the teaching profession. This is the main reason why he deserve it not because he is a gay.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:It is going to be different. No parents will want to send their children there, knowing that there is a "dirty" man there.
The parents will not request the school whatever furniture, but will request to transfer school.Originally posted by shade343:To complicate matters, the parents who send their kids to the school demanded that the school change whatever furniture the gay teacher touched for fear that their children might contract some unknown disease.![]()
He shld not be sacked due to him being gay.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Back to the question: Should be he or should he not be sacked?
He should.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Back to the question: Should be he or should he not be sacked?
He was not convicted. He was caught and let off with a stern warning. Conviction will lead to a jail sentence. Please study the law book.Originally posted by Chrnomage:not that we are saying that gays are not humans but he was convicted which made him suspicious. even though it didnt state that he was not a pedo, he should have taken precautions.
He has certainly offended the law.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:He was not convicted. He was caught and let off with a stern warning. Conviction will lead to a jail sentence. Please study the law book.
Why you so clear about this case?Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:He was not convicted. He was caught and let off with a stern warning. Conviction will lead to a jail sentence. Please study the law book.
That's right.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:So, most of you agree that he shouldn't be given a chance to go back to teach?
I am not him. I just happen to read in the newspapers and that was what the newspapers report.Originally posted by Honeybunz:Why you so clear about this case?
You are him izzit?
Still, in today's society, where we are more open-minded, I don't think it is bad. In a few more years' time, it may be a societal norm.Originally posted by choco B:A teacher is expected to be a role model and should possess a good, up-right character. Once he is found doing something unlawful, he no longer fulfills his professional requirements. Thus I think the school has grounds to fire him.
As for him teaching in the future, much as I do not oppose homosexuality, I think a record that smears your character will be very hard to erase or ignore.
The unwritten rule is that teachers must also follow the societal norm. I think in Singapore, teaching organisations do not encourage anything too deviant or radical, whether in private or public schools. As long as what one does in his private life is kept private, employers have no issues.
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Still, in today's society, where we are more open-minded, I don't think it is bad. In a few more years' time, it may be a societal norm.