i totally agree with uOriginally posted by huy:of cos not la. i think that it is perfectly all right for the staff to surf the internet, (not those undesirable websites) ,check their mails if they have finish all their work. at least this wil kip them occupied, rather then seeing them falling alseep on the desk
It's just alot of words, but think it's a good point even though you don't friggin understand.Originally posted by adelinechen:it's actually quite a good point...haha...
Yeah... Very close to my idea...Originally posted by kopiosatu:ok...
think about it. you're a worker, slogging your life away. but the best part about the job is that you get to send email, listen to music and download stuff. so you come to work, just do some work and the extra stuff keeps you happy.
but suddenly your boss takes all that for you, he wants to boost productivity. you're forced to work all the way, maybe you go talk to ur colleagues more to pass time. But the quirks are gone, you feel bored, you don't want to come to work anymore. You spend your time working a little and when you talk to your colleagues, you talk about how sucky the workplace is. You're monitored everywhere you go, you're monitored when you type anything on the keyboard.
How do you think you will feel?
Unless the staff are a-ok with the decision, productivity might increase, but now that the staff are sending a rep to discuss about this issue, they are not agreeable and should this still be implemented. It will affect the staff and productivity in the long run.
I am confused. When he/she said "my father's company ...", did he/she mean the company owned by his/her father or is it the company that his/her father is working in? We have to be careful here because we don't want to accuse someone who did not directly give the instructions to implement it.Originally posted by alexkusu:This action is shown to decrease productivity and efficieny. Its one of the leading causes of job disastifaction as well. Is that what your dad is trying to achieve?
Even if your dad decide to implement this system, there are ways around it.
agree.Originally posted by TooFree:Crap.
Probably the company is owned by the father. I didnt accuse anyone. Just stating the expected impactsOriginally posted by waitrose:I am confused. When he/she said "my father's company ...", did he/she mean the company owned by his/her father or is it the company that his/her father is working in? We have to be careful here because we don't want to accuse someone who did not directly give the instructions to implement it.
usage of computers...as long as its not to those undesirable websites...should be ok mah...down to the last keystrokes is too much...Originally posted by adelinechen:My father's company intends to install surveillance software in the office network to track staff usage of computers, down to the last keystrokes. They are also planning to install surveillance camera in the name of security. The employees felt that their privacy is intruded. Do you think it should be implemented?
I do heard abt MNCs screening emails/calls and blocking undesirable ports but keystroke tracking is certainly unheard of.Originally posted by waitrose:Let me guess....must be a Singapore company, right? I cannot imagine MNCs doing such a thing.