yah...next time I will do that...he only break in 2 eggs...and the amount of eggs in the dish was so miserable....Originally posted by mistyblue:next time tell uncle you break his egg for him...![]()
The Yolk went in...but very little egg white went in...Originally posted by fudgester:Egg yolks are high in cholesterol....
The uncle was concerned about your health.![]()
I think its because that way is faster and looks good. I do it sometimes too when i am cooking at home (and pretending to be a seasoned cook).Originally posted by shade343:I ordered a plate of char Kway teow for lunch this afternoon. While I was waiting for my order to be ready, I happened to be observing the hawker. From the way he knocked the eggs into the wok, I saw that only 1/2 of the contents went inside the wok and the remaining being dump away. What a waste of food!
Oh.... the egg white has a lot of protein....Originally posted by shade343:The Yolk went in...but very little egg white went in...
I just realised this isnt the first time that it happen to me...I remebered the same thing happened when I ordered a plate of char kway teow in Kallang Bahru also....Originally posted by ditzy:Don't generalise, its only that one hawker that served you.![]()
That proves my hypothesis, its only you.Originally posted by shade343:I just realised this isnt the first time that it happen to me...I remebered the same thing happened when I ordered a plate of char kway teow in Kallang Bahru also....
are you sure ? you got take up the egg shell and checked ?Originally posted by shade343:I ordered a plate of char Kway teow for lunch this afternoon. While I was waiting for my order to be ready, I happened to be observing the hawker. From the way he knocked the eggs into the wok, I saw that only 1/2 of the contents went inside the wok and the remaining being dump away. What a waste of food!
Its very obvious. I was watching him while he was cooking. He just cracked it with one hand emptied the yolk and dump the rest. Come to think of it....I saw the same thing happened at another oh lua stall....Originally posted by crazy monkey:are you sure ? you got take up the egg shell and checked ?![]()
seeing is believeing. you think uncle so stupid like you waste egg and increase his cost ? next time you go take up the egg shell and check lahOriginally posted by shade343:Its very obvious. I was watching him while he was cooking. He just cracked it with one hand emptied the yolk and dump the rest. Come to think of it....I saw the same thing happened at another oh lua stall....
....-_-' Perhaps you would like to order a plate of char kway teow and see for yourself?Originally posted by crazy monkey:seeing is believeing. you think uncle so stupid like you waste egg and increase his cost ? next time you go take up the egg shell and check lah![]()
oh you mean he like just open very small with one hand?Originally posted by shade343:Its very obvious. I was watching him while he was cooking. He just cracked it with one hand emptied the yolk and dump the rest. Come to think of it....I saw the same thing happened at another oh lua stall....
I dont think so...Its very obvious that less than 70% of the egg goes into the wok.Originally posted by hisoka:oh you mean he like just open very small with one hand?
actually i think the whole egg came up just that he only use one hand. i also can do that, courtesy of being a cripple for a few months
isn't 'z' reserved for the standard normal distributionOriginally posted by ditzy:This could be done at research level in uni. Do take note.Remember, take n = number of samples and z = interval at confidence level.
![]()
Orrr, solly, i was never good in stats.Originally posted by Kenneth Tan Jian Wei:isn't 'z' reserved for the standard normal distribution
Ask shade343 where he ordered his, and make sure you don't go there.Originally posted by stellazio:Mine give full egg leh,plus alot of hum..![]()
it's ok if you suck at stats, as long as you're good in sexOriginally posted by ditzy:Orrr, solly, i was never good in stats.If i bothered to dig up my notes, I'll be putting in too much effort to answer a thread.
![]()