Researcher who predicted 04' Tsunami say SG not safe fr. it
-
Singapore is at the south of Malaysia. If epicenter is moving north, how could we be affected? Did Straits Times report wrongly?Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:Thailand's iconic meteorologist , Dr Smith predicted that a killer tsunami would hit Thailand one day in 1998 told the straits times that Singapore and M'sia would be in danger from a future tsunami.
"Singapore is relatively low lying and quite flat and would be badly affected. Remember in December , the tsunami was 30 m high in Banda Aceh , At Khao Lak it was 16 m high.
The epiccenter is moving north"
- Excerpt from Straits Times Special Report Page S5
anyone want to start migrating?
-
You need serious help in the theory on HOW tsunami is formed? Why Spore isn't affected this time round? why a place far away like Sri Lanka is affected... and also look at the map on the straits of malacca to understand what this theory...Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Singapore is at the south of Malaysia. If epicenter is moving north, how could we be affected? Did Straits Times report wrongly?
I am not saying his hypothesis is correct, but it does make some sense. -
But I still don't understand. I understood how a place as far as Sri Lanka got affected, that is because they near Indian Ocean. But Singapore? If epicenter moving north, should be those at the north being affected. Or does earthquake moves the other way round, meaning their north = our south?Originally posted by spencer99:You need serious help in the theory on HOW tsunami is formed? Why Spore isn't affected this time round? why a place far away like Sri Lanka is affected... and also look at the map on the straits of malacca to understand what this theory...
I am not saying his hypothesis is correct, but it does make some sense. -
just pray lah Wtf..
-
looks like I must draw tarot liaoz...........
