x2Originally posted by LazerLordz:Because we are not used to the concept of a state raising a hoo-ha over their own citizens' fate.Do you see our beloved state doing so?No.Hell will freeze over first.
i'm not sure i quite agree with this,Originally posted by LazerLordz:Because we are not used to the concept of a state raising a hoo-ha over their own citizens' fate.Do you see our beloved state doing so?No.Hell will freeze over first.
Again, it is our mindset.What if a Singaporean was caught for a crime that is not so in Singapore?Do we let him rot?So much for every citizen matters.Let's just say that sovereignty is no absolute excuse for cross border criminal legislative issues anymore.Those who fail to accept it will suffer.Originally posted by Fatum:i'm not sure i quite agree with this,
remember the flor contemplacion case, someone in the Phillipines govt actually raised the possibility of striking a deal to exchange prisoners, that is, return a few Singaporeans (a few rapist and a robber or something, if i recall) languishing in their jails in exchange for flor, i think LKY said "siao !" to them, or something to that effect ....
We must not be so gullible as to misplace our sympathies with a criminal ....
if one of our chaps say, got kidnapped by insurgents in Iraq while on a UN aid mission or something, i'm sure our goverment's response would be different (though they did state that they would never negotiate with terrorists, but that's fodder for another thread .. ) ....
just don't expect the govt to make a hoo haa over you if you commit a crime in another country ......
shd ask them to use christmas island to exchangeOriginally posted by Fatum:i'm not sure i quite agree with this,
remember the flor contemplacion case, someone in the Phillipines govt actually raised the possibility of striking a deal to exchange prisoners, that is, return a few Singaporeans (a few rapist and a robber or something, if i recall) languishing in their jails in exchange for flor, i think LKY said "siao !" to them, or something to that effect ....
We must not be so gullible as to misplace our sympathies with a criminal ....
if one of our chaps say, got kidnapped by insurgents in Iraq while on a UN aid mission or something, i'm sure our goverment's response would be different (though they did state that they would never negotiate with terrorists, but that's fodder for another thread .. ) ....
just don't expect the govt to make a hoo haa over you if you commit a crime in another country ......
hmmm .... good point bro ...Originally posted by LazerLordz:Again, it is our mindset.What if a Singaporean was caught for a crime that is not so in Singapore?Do we let him rot?So much for every citizen matters.Let's just say that sovereignty is no absolute excuse for cross border criminal legislative issues anymore.Those who fail to accept it will suffer.
ya he shd just come to singapore be gigolooOriginally posted by Sardaukar:And those drugs would have gone on to Australia and maybe some in Singapore,and people potentially would have gotten addicted to them,ruining their lives and destroying their bonds with family and friends,perpetuating a vicious cycle.
By intercepting those drugs,we potentially stopped that cycle from affecting innocent people,something that this fellow probably wasn't thinking about,how he was going to ruin the lives of others.
I truly sympathise with him if he was truly going to try to sell those drugs to try and bail out his brother,but there were other methods available,and probably less harmful though no less illegal substances he could have trafficked in.
I am not saying whether he deserves to die or not,but he knew the laws of Singapore,and he wilfully violted them.Those laws demand that their breaking results in the deaht penalty.That is a fact.
I do wonder though,since the trafficker is Australian Vietnamese,what if it had been an Australian of Caucasian descent?What would the reaction be then?
I agree that we should expect our govt to negotiate on our behalf when we have committed a crime overseas but for the above scenerio...I think U have too much faith in our govt...I dont think they will make any hoo haa in any case...maybe hide behind the @ss of UN and whine a little...Originally posted by Fatum:if one of our chaps say, got kidnapped by insurgents in Iraq while on a UN aid mission or something, i'm sure our goverment's response would be different (though they did state that they would never negotiate with terrorists, but that's fodder for another thread .. ) ....
just don't expect the govt to make a hoo haa over you if you commit a crime in another country ......
You let one go, you let everybody go and the law crumbles.Originally posted by targa2:fcuking hell.. if they hang all the drug dealers.. where am i gonna get my next fix?
I agree with the australians.. let that poor man go!

Agreed..except it's 'spectre'...Originally posted by dakkon_blackblade:It is sad that he was forced into smuggling drugs and got caught for it, of all places in Singapore. However, laws are laws, and in Singapore, the anti-drug laws are tough and effective. We should not bow down to a vocal minority of bleeding heart liberals and back down on the execution of drug traffickers. We should never compromise against those who wilfully or otherwise attempt to taint our society with the specter of drug addiction. For these reasons, Nguyen has to face the due punishment of law.