Originally posted by virtualchick:I say try despite what the advertisement requires. If the employer is desperate and the job is not that appealing, you might stand a chance. The boss then has two choices, he either hires someone inexperienced or pays a very high salary to entice someone experienced. Different employers might have different requirements. My former boss hired me even though I had no experience. It was a lucky break for me, but I was so lowly paid even I felt it was low, exploitative even. But years later I was better positioned in the market to move on to bigger better things. Later I realised that my boss didn't want to hire the best applicant, but the inexperienced (and therefore hypothetically the worst) and of course the cheapest cos she had a family to feed and could not afford the chosen applicant to overshadow her.
My guess was correct, with the mindset of such recruiter, company will not improve. Even, if improved, the advanement will be limited..Originally posted by virtualchick:I finally left after getting the requisite experience because I was doing 75% of the work and getting 25% of the pay. Not much to improve in my department, it is a cost centre, in the end they just need someone to process the daily routine transactions. It is really a 'learning experience' kind of job.
Originally posted by YI:ic.. office politic starts at recruitment..![]()