Gays are destined to be terminated!
-
I just thought tonight...the theory of natural selection, weak genes dead out.
Gays = boy + boy = no baby. the genes of the gay couple are clearlyready to die out with them. which means gay are failure genes?
Maybe gays are not right at all even though our world is now more open.
just a thought. who is gay here? care to make a point?
-
+1 before close and ban.
-
Why didn;t u manage girl and girl? Are u a sexist? Or rather, are u a gay...haa..must be..no doubt
-
why lock and ban?
when you think about it, this natural selection is going on for millions of years..
its really a thought. -
look, its either we have same and opposite sex relationships, or you can choose death by nukes, death by worldwide flooding or death by hole in ozone layer
-
self-terminationOriginally posted by kendoboi:Why didn;t u manage girl and girl? Are u a sexist? Or rather, are u a gay...haa..must be..no doubt -
girl and girl also can.Originally posted by kendoboi:Why didn;t u manage girl and girl? Are u a sexist? Or rather, are u a gay...haa..must be..no doubt i just thought about that gay/les may have genes that are destined for termination.
gays/les have always make it sound that they are born that way. so the genes are faulty..in a sense. -
Your theory is flawed. Gay genes are probably recessive.
This means when you breed a guy and a girl together, assuming both of them have the gay gene, the out come wll be something like this.
By Punett squares:
S G
S
G
S-straight gene
G-gay gene
Outcome 1: SS (straight)
Outcome 2: SG (straight)
Outcome 3: SG (straight)
Outcome 4: GG (gay)
So gays will never be terminated. -
whatever..
-
No, they won't be because there is no convincing evidence that it is genetically linked. It's a lifestyle choice although the gays disagree....
-
you mean every one of us have gay genes?
well when two become couple then the genes will be terminated. natural selection to kill off gay?
just a thought. not a flame war against gay. -
SInce you studied the theory of evolution, you should know how to do punnet squares right?Originally posted by boyish love:you mean every one of us have gay genes?
well when two become couple then the genes will be terminated. natural selection to kill off gay?
just a thought. not a flame war against gay. -
yep sounds true but the gays keep arguing they are born this way. but none of us who have experience wouldnt know who is right.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:No, they won't be because there is no convincing evidence that it is genetically linked. It's a lifestyle choice although the gays disagree....
assuming its all down to genetics then they are the weakest link! -
not so muchOriginally posted by shade343:SInce you studied the theory of evolution, you should know how to do punnet squares right?
in any case gays gene seem to be failure genes against the law of nature. it is funny to see them campaign en masses but they are the failures of human kind? -
let the flaming begin!!
-
there's a theory every heterosexual being carry a homosexual gene. Hence they or may not turn out to be gay
-
think about it. gays have straight parents do they not? u think u need 2 gays to provide the genes for a gay offspring? unfortunately u're wrong.Originally posted by boyish love:I just thought tonight...the theory of natural selection, weak genes dead out.
Gays = boy + boy = no baby. the genes of the gay couple are clearlyready to die out with them. which means gay are failure genes?
Maybe gays are not right at all even though our world is now more open.
just a thought. who is gay here? care to make a point?
it is a certain combination of genes from both STRAIGHT parents that results in a gay sexuality combination.
looks like u have a lot to grasp about the theory of natural selection. If being gay is a weakness in the gene pool u wanna think about why it is still strongly in existance not only within the human species, but in thousands of other animal species as well? -
yes glad to see there are other people here who have a better grasp of the concept.Originally posted by shade343:Your theory is flawed. Gay genes are probably recessive.
This means when you breed a guy and a girl together, assuming both of them have the gay gene, the out come wll be something like this.
By Punett squares:
S G
S
G
S-straight gene
G-gay gene
Outcome 1: SS (straight)
Outcome 2: SG (straight)
Outcome 3: SG (straight)
Outcome 4: GG (gay)
So gays will never be terminated.
oh unfortunately there is only no convincing evidence to people who just refuse to accept it. Probably have to ask themselves whether its because they cannot face up to the truth of their own sexuality deep down inside them -
Er...no. Just. No.
-
Let sleeping gays live in peace.
-
And that's assuming that the straight gene is completely dominant over the gay gene. Very bad assumption in science.Originally posted by shade343:Your theory is flawed. Gay genes are probably recessive.
This means when you breed a guy and a girl together, assuming both of them have the gay gene, the out come wll be something like this.
By Punett squares:
S G
S
G
S-straight gene
G-gay gene
Outcome 1: SS (straight)
Outcome 2: SG (straight)
Outcome 3: SG (straight)
Outcome 4: GG (gay)
So gays will never be terminated. -
very good point.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:And that's assuming that the straight gene is completely dominant over the gay gene. Very bad assumption in science.
the actual fact that there seem to be less gay than straight people in existance is probably due to the social conditioning many people received during their upbringing, thus leading them to lead a life of denial. -
you can fuck yourself
-
saw a lot of gir + gir nowadays ....Originally posted by kendoboi:Why didn;t u manage girl and girl? Are u a sexist? Or rather, are u a gay...haa..must be..no doubt -
i not putting gays down but i do think gays are genetic defects. if what they say about been born gay without a choice is trueOriginally posted by HENG@:think about it. gays have straight parents do they not? u think u need 2 gays to provide the genes for a gay offspring? unfortunately u're wrong.
it is a certain combination of genes from both STRAIGHT parents that results in a gay sexuality combination.
looks like u have a lot to grasp about the theory of natural selection. If being gay is a weakness in the gene pool u wanna think about why it is still strongly in existance not only within the human species, but in thousands of other animal species as well?
like down syndrome. there is a chance for it to happen even when parents are healthy, but very low chance for a down syndrome guy to pass on his genes. gays have no chance.
i think gays have stronger gay gene than straight?
am i right?