He was pathetic considering how his wife treated him.Originally posted by king108:However, I would like to say that "Jiang Tai Gong" never needed to use force or means.."Liker get hooked" you like it you get hooked, else you are free..He is still better after all.
![]()
![]()
Lui Bei good horse is called "Di Lu" but does not favour master..easy to identify because it's white horse..no white elephant..Pang Tong..so so only..Not really that good..rushed for flame..Originally posted by yongyong:liu bei killed the dragon and the phoenix.....
1. Pang Tong is dead because liu bei wanted pang tong to ride on his horse.
2. Kong Ming borrowed life from the god, but Wei Yan rushed in and destroy the ceremony. Who the hell is Wei Yan ? Kong Ming once wanna killed him, buy liu bei stopped him.
Most of it is fiction lah.Originally posted by king108:Famous Battle of the "Red Clay Wall", anyone interested..everyone talk so much..about Kong Ming "lend east wind" tactics..Anyone wanted to comment..
Not fiction lar ..Originally posted by Icemoon:Most of it is fiction lah.
Historically Zhou Yu should get the credit.
ya. thats y, i said liu bei killed the dragon and phoenix..Originally posted by king108:Lui Bei good horse is called "Di Lu" but does not favour master..easy to identify because it's white horse..no white elephant..Pang Tong..so so only..Not really that good..rushed for flame..![]()
Wei Yan is an unfaithful generals..he killed his own master when wanted to deflect to Lui Pei. Kong Ming did wanted to finish him off, but weak Lui Pei didn't wanted to kill someone who offer service to him.![]()
![]()
did kong ming borrow the wind? did he battle vocally the intellectuals of Wu?Originally posted by yongyong:Not fiction lar ..
wei yan died in the end for treason.Originally posted by yongyong:liu bei killed the dragon and the phoenix.....
1. Pang Tong is dead because liu bei wanted pang tong to ride on his horse.
2. Kong Ming borrowed life from the god, but Wei Yan rushed in and destroy the ceremony. Who the hell is Wei Yan ? Kong Ming once wanna killed him, buy liu bei stopped him.
The son is weak..Historian mentioned that Kong Ming was jealous of Guan Yu that why never go to his rescue. In actual world Guan Yu wasn't that good and was beautified by the novel. The real one is Zhau Yun..both fighting and intelligence. gutsy tooOriginally posted by justdoit77:Liu Chan is the worst one. But why Liu Chan so lousy, because his dad Liu Bei doesn't know how to teach him, he live in a protected and pleasure environment since young, of coz don't know much thing lah.
Liu Bei also one, when Guan Yu's province is under attack by Cao Cao and Sun Quan, he refused to send reinforcement to help his sworn in brother. The defeat of Guan Yu cause some other chaining effect for example loss of land, the death of Zhang Fei, Liu Bei, break up bettwen Shu and Wu.
Kong Ming also one, he purposely let Guan Yu guard the path to watch for Cao Cao after the Che Bi battle. He think that if Cao Cao is killed, Sun Quan will change target to Han Dynasty. wrong moves lah.
Zhao Yun, Chang pan po, 1 against duno how many Cao Cao generals.Originally posted by king108:The son is weak..Historian mentioned that Kong Ming was jealous of Guan Yu that why never go to his rescue. In actual world Guan Yu wasn't that good and was beautified by the novel. The real one is Zhau Yun..both fighting and intelligence. gutsy too
bar fight?Originally posted by gr2012:Kong Ming died before the war ended, right?
Actually, most of the original characters had died when the Sima guys took over.
But blardy Liu Bei died of GRIEF.
WHO THE HELL DIES LIKE THAT?
Even worse, Zhang Fei was killed in a bar fight...such a fierce and powerful warrior, getting killed in a bar fight.
Originally posted by Li Ka Shing:I believe the Romance of the Three Kingdoms has wrongly put an emphasis on war strategies and intrigues. This is harmful for society.
i find it silly.Originally posted by king108:Seven defeats (capture) and seven releases of "Mang Hou". This parts of the stories show that Kong Ming was good when handling barbarians.
Why did he do that and no killing him on the first, second or third times..giving 7 chances to opponents is stupid? smart? or too free nothing to do?
Will us in real life do that to our opponent..as long as you are human..the answer can be never..
I think Kong Ming's move is smart. Like "Han Zhong Wang" never killed the Qin surrendered soldiers, while "Chu Ba Wang" killed a lot because of his loved woman "Ji"
In real life, I never go after a scared dog to a dead corner, cause he may bite me at all cost..Hence, it is good to let the opponent to have a retreat route so that they will surrender with less resistance.
However, the smartest move may be buying their heart if they are loyal to their old bosses, else can considered removing him when you have replacement.
No all opponents are no good for you. History does show us that we can have talented opponent giving their service if you respected them.
Any comments.![]()
Originally posted by dragg:i find it silly.
how many actually died or got injured just to make him 'fu' kong ming?