let me rephrase the last sentence.Originally posted by browniebaobao:not selfless vs dirty or watever..
when there's love, there will be lust.
but when there's lust, will there be love?
when there lust, it can lead to love or it may not.Originally posted by browniebaobao:not selfless vs dirty or watever..
when there's love, there will be lust.
but when there's lust, will there be love?
love usually contains lust plus other thingsOriginally posted by aku1b0d0:let me rephrase the last sentence.
When there's only lust, will there be love?
i'm talking about 100% lust, not love.Originally posted by january:love usually contains lust plus other things
like care and concern,
Not really, I mean that there are people who can like to eat metal things or implant spikes under their skin to resemble wild animals.Originally posted by aku1b0d0:another vote for "without physical contacts, still can love mah" !!!![]()
![]()
ya i think lust is important , necessary condition for love to maintainI Personally Feel...Lust is What leads Relationships to a Full stop...If you Lust and Love... Soon enough your gonna get bored...So i believe Love than Lust..
I don't believe 100% lust exists.Originally posted by aku1b0d0:i'm talking about 100% lust, not love.
to mi its will nv nv exist, because there muz be a balance between physcial and affection attraction like two way communication...Originally posted by january:i dun think so.. what about you guys?
what does this tell us if love cannot exist if people can only hold hands?
i talking about love between a guy and girl.