I don't agree with the above statement. many MNCs or govt sector have a tiered structure.... For non-grad, they will come in at technician level, for grad, at engineer level. in some org, there is almost no way for a non-grad to be an engineer...Originally posted by Gordonator:no offences to undergraduates. a degree might be important if u are into bussiness or management related jobs but for engineering it's a totally different story.
engineering requires experiences. imagine this, two 20 years old after NS, 1 started working as a engineer and the other goes into university.
4 years later, the 2nd guy finally graduated. but the 1st guy will already has 4 years of working and engineering experiences while the 2nd guy is only a noob with no working experiences and only textbook knowledge of what he learnt in university.
from my experiences, employers/customers/clients' expectations for a good engineer is that they don't care whether u are a degree holder or O level, as long as u can set up/troubleshoot and maintain the system, u are the person they want.![]()
Yupz.. I agree! Basically, it all boils down to prospects... Experience alone wont get you very far... You need both experience and paper qualifications to climb up the corporate ladder... If experience alone is sufficient, then the CEOs of all the companies must be at least 100 years old because they are supposed to be the most experienced in the whole organization...Originally posted by spencer99:I don't agree with the above statement. many MNCs or govt sector have a tiered structure.... For non-grad, they will come in at technician level, for grad, at engineer level. in some org, there is almost no way for a non-grad to be an engineer...
Also, the above statement is quite short-term in outlook. experience is more important. but do you want to maintain a system all your life??
With a degree, you are better positioned to progress in life, maybe move on to another higher level job with your technical skills, maanage a team of engineers for example...
No. No. No no no no no.Originally posted by january:you can easily find out what modules the course if teaching, go to the university bookstores and buy those textbooks and read yourself.
I disagree that university is a place to gain knowledge. It provides you with opportunities for learning, but by itself it is never a place to fill you with knowledge.Originally posted by DriftingGuy:Actually a university is there for people to gain knowledge, not just to get the paper qualification for a better job.
Given the right circumstances, I would have chosen subjects that I would be interested in, and not those that I chose because of course requirements or because I can get an A in that.
Somewhere down the line, the universities stopped becoming centers of learning.
yup, for engineers, w/o a degree, the door to PE board is shutOriginally posted by spencer99:I don't agree with the above statement. many MNCs or govt sector have a tiered structure.... For non-grad, they will come in at technician level, for grad, at engineer level. in some org, there is almost no way for a non-grad to be an engineer...
Also, the above statement is quite short-term in outlook. experience is more important. but do you want to maintain a system all your life??
With a degree, you are better positioned to progress in life, maybe move on to another higher level job with your technical skills, maanage a team of engineers for example...
Your post is a little weird to me.Originally posted by No9:if alll the knowledge in the world can be read from textbooks, den why do we still attend sch??gaining knowledge is one thing, having the right attitude to learning is another. thats why singapore is revamping its education policy. Gone are the days where simply memorising will get u an A. Memorise for what?? Are you a harddisk?? All the info u'll ever need is available on the internet.
Originally posted by Icemoon:Your post is a little weird to me.
So does attending school cultivate the right attitude to learning?
Or can you have the right attitude to learning without attending school?
The latter is certainly possible, in fact it is what we do after graduation.
Actually memorising is part of the learning process. If you don't memorise, it is hard to appear cultivated .. lol .. imagine the following scenario - "A certain philosopher said this, let me paraphrase .. oh shit .. I can't even paraphrase cos I cant remember a thing"
By the way, you think internet very powerful? Make you work in government agency like MHA or DSTA .. limited or no internet access .. let's see how you do your work.![]()
Laptop by the side? Own time own target?Originally posted by No9:U misinterpreted me.
I nv mentioned the internet is powerful.what i meant was all the information is available on the net..hence problems now shud emphasize more on critical thinking than memorising...u may want to noe how MIT people do their examinations..own time on target..with a labtop by the side..
let me try to talk abt tiered structure...Originally posted by spencer99:I don't agree with the above statement. many MNCs or govt sector have a tiered structure.... For non-grad, they will come in at technician level, for grad, at engineer level. in some org, there is almost no way for a non-grad to be an engineer...
Also, the above statement is quite short-term in outlook. experience is more important. but do you want to maintain a system all your life??
With a degree, you are better positioned to progress in life, maybe move on to another higher level job with your technical skills, maanage a team of engineers for example...
Originally posted by Icemoon:Laptop by the side? Own time own target?
Can use MSN or not?![]()
then all hell is loose.Originally posted by No9:I think can.
hehe
Indeed? Well, let's see.Originally posted by january:u dun need to go to university to know that learning process is useful and great. even if u are not university , wherever u are, you can learn and gain knowledge. learning and applying knowledge should be done all the time and at all situations and at all cases.....
So it's entirely possible that non-degree holders can go as far as degree holders because it's a matter of their intrinsic characteristics rather than their education? Well and good.Originally posted by january:let me talk about technician view again. first, by opting not to go university, he has already saved $35000 dollars. he can go out earlier and start working as a technician and start savings. withing the technician system, there will be some levels to rise to be very senior technician.
Well, you've already said that the degree doesn't add anything to the person's capabilities, but you've backtracked here by saying that the non-grads' lack of capability is due to their being non-grads. Make up your mind - is it nature, or is it nurture?Originally posted by january:most non grad dun achieve this because non grad are usually not capable than grad in the first place because they have not as good environment when they grow up.
i get what u mean by my contradiction.Originally posted by Gedanken:Well, you've already said that the degree doesn't add anything to the person's capabilities, but you've backtracked here by saying that the non-grads' lack of capability is due to their being non-grads. Make up your mind - is it nature, or is it nurture?
Put simply, you've just shot yourself in the foot. The irony of this is that logical errors like the one you just committed are covered in first-year undergraduate Critical Thinking subjects. In other words, you could have been outdone by someone who's spent a short six months at university, using something that doesn't even register as a party trick at university-level learning.
If you want to believe that a university education provides you no value beyond meaningless qualifications, go right ahead. You've said you can achieve the same learning without university but I've just shown you how you've shown you can't, and that's just the tip of the iceberg of what you don't know about university education.
Still and all, if you do wish to cling to your illusions and stick to pithy platitudes, you're perfectly entitled to. Just don't be disappointed when you get nothing out of it - your argument would never lead to anything actionable because it's got such huge holes in it.
what make u so sure a non grad cannot be an engineer?Originally posted by january:let me try to talk abt tiered structure...
for non grad, he cannot be engineer, but there is still a technician system where he can climb. even for grad, he can be a professional engineer, but the engineer system itself will have a ceiling also. it is not as if degree person can climb all the way.
ok, its my mistake.Originally posted by Gordonator:what make u so sure a non grad cannot be an engineer?
for your information, there are many capable non grad engineers out there. senior engineers, project engineers, team leaders etc.![]()
Ya la, what I meant was as a place of learning, not just the chase for paperOriginally posted by Icemoon:I disagree that university is a place to gain knowledge. It provides you with opportunities for learning, but by itself it is never a place to fill you with knowledge.
The notion that to gain knowledge is learning is a misconception.