Originally posted by alveo:
you must be thinking of the american journalists. in the US, journalists are given certain freedoms.
however, nobody, nowhere, is allowed to defame a person or entity. if an american newspaper claimed that Bush commits bestiality, but doesn't provide evidence, they can and probably will be sued.
Sorry, I thought I mentioned India earlier on? Yep, I am referring to India here. U can see outrageous comics daily in newspapers..
And I think ur sentence about nobody, nowhere.......entity, is wrong.. I wiki-ied and found this:
Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one's opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment. "Speech" is not limited to public speaking and is generally taken to include other forms of expression. The right is preserved in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is granted formal recognition by the laws of most nations. Nonetheless the degree to which the right is upheld in practice varies greatly from one nation to another. In many nations, particularly those with relatively authoritarian forms of government, overt government censorship is enforced. Censorship has also been claimed to occur in other forms (see propaganda model) and there are different approaches to issues such as hate speech, obscenity, and defamation laws even in countries seen as liberal democracies.
Which means that some countries have no laws specifically against defamation and hence in other words allow defamation? lol.. I am getting confused myself.. Damn sleepy..
And Cullen, about newspapers, I was referring to India as well. Nope they are not controlled by government. (as far as i know)