DSLR Camera

• Y_Shun

  3 Sep 07, 22:18

  Originally posted by ^tamago^:

  yes, if u are using long shutter/exposure. anti-shake lens are almost universally not provided as stock.
  
  u can look for anti-shake bodies but i think it'll be horridly expensive. sorry i dun look too far beyond my camera so cannot give advice.

  
  
  those anti-shake lens expensive anot?
  
  cuz i tot built in anti-blur/shake is sony a-100 ?
• kopiosatu

  3 Sep 07, 22:33

  any camera will do.
  
  depending on what results you want.
  
  nikon tends to give more saturated colours compared to canon.
  canon will give more "real" colours.
  
  but to me, both are the same.
  
  price wise, nikon should be cheaper.
• cairocks

  4 Sep 07, 02:02

  Originally posted by Y_Shun:

  
  
  those anti-shake lens expensive anot?
  
  cuz i tot built in anti-blur/shake is sony a-100 ?

  Anti shake lenses are not cheap. Easily 4 digits figure. The recent comex sees the sony A-100 selling at $1099 with just one basic kit lens and $1399 for the 2 lens package. Think Pentex and Olympus also have anti shake built into the body if I am not wrong. But gotta check.