Gambling, like forex trading, never pays....
-
good coolie.... thanks for bumping up my thread...
-
SureOriginally posted by deathbait:unfortunately for you of course, mine was not a sweeping statement, while yours actually was.
here's where you say "touche".
"Odds ARE everything" is not a sweeping statement... please continue to make it... after all you have been making this grossly stupid statement for 9 pages... (the first couple of pages, you did not expressed it but I deduce it)... see how groossly stupid your posts right from the start were?
please continue to make the statement ... "Odds ARE everything" ..... I am sure nobody is complaining that you continue to make a fool of yourself... -
i can't help it if you continually find it funny because you have no idea what constitutes a sweeping statement.
honestly, why do you keep attempting to beat me with word play. It's like taking candy from a baby. Open up that vast experience of yours as a trader and beat me with valid theories of the markets.
You know it's bad when your opponent has to teach the correct strategy to win an argument. -
hahahaha... you don't find it hilarious when someone says "xxxx are EVERYTHING" and claims that it is not sweeping statement .... this is getting funnier by the minute...
I told you so many times... and yet you were too stupid to get it... now that you finally get it, you claim that "it is not sweeping statement ...."
I though that once you get it, that would be they end of the fun... but apparently, no...
hahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!! -
8-9 pages and you cannot get it... and when you finally get it you say...
"xxxx ARE everything" is not a sweeping statement....
I haven't laughed so hard for a really long time.... -
well, all you have to do to prove this were a sweeping statement was to point out one other thing other than odds that should affect your investment judgement.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:hahahaha... you don't find it hilarious when someone says "xxxx are EVERYTHING" and claims that it is not sweeping statement .... this is getting funnier by the minute...
I told you so many times... and yet you were too stupid to get it... now that you finally get it, you claim that "it is not sweeping statement ...."
I though that once you get it, that would be they end of the fun... but apparently, no...
hahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
but 4 pages later, you still can't.
It's not a sweeping statement if it's a fact. Such as "Every man without a head will die".
On the other hand, i can point out numerous forms of gambling, or people who dabble in the forex who can prove that it actually DOES pay. -
Yes, sure... please continue making your grossly stupid statement that "odds ARE everything" and say "odds ARE everything" is not a sweeping statement...
looks like we are going to have a lot more fun.... -
People reading this thread... please read this book to see for yourself Who Wins, Who Loses and Why...
I think the book is this one...Originally posted by shinta:link pls
The Futures Game: Who Wins, Who Loses, & Why: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why (Hardcover)
... please don't be a grossly stupid person and believe the delusions in your head...
by Richard J. Teweles (Author), Frank, J. Jones (Author) "This is a book about trading futures ..." (more) -
well you can continue repeating it to yourself for eternity for personal fun and giggles.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Yes, sure... please continue making your grossly stupid statement that "odds ARE everything" and say "odds ARE everything" is not a sweeping statement...
looks like we are going to have a lot more fun....
But the fact remains that it's not a sweeping statement if it in actuality is the truth. There's nothing wrong with saying "all the balls are red" if all the aforementioned balls ARE red.
Once again i have to teach you. Please don't try to beat me with the english language. You are far below par in that area. If you truly were dedicated to this discussion, or passionate about your work, I invite you to refute my points in the area of YOUR expertise, the investment arena.
You can of course start by proving me wrong. Just name one other factor that should affect an investment decision.
I await your answer.
Hopefully it won't be filled with senseless LOL emoticons and actually hold stuff of substance. -
also, for proof of aliens, pm me for a list of my books on conspiracy theories=)Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:People reading this thread... please read this book to see for yourself Who Wins, Who Loses and Why...
... please don't be a grossly stupid person and believe the delusions in your head... -
You say "odds ARE everything... ", claim that it is not a sweeping statement, and say " in actuality is the truth."Originally posted by deathbait:But the fact remains that it's not a sweeping statement if it in actuality is the truth.
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.... -
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
So got difference or not hah???
There is no difference other than in some people's mind... both are activities where you place a bet hoping for a reward. The place and the mechanism is different, but there are no essential differences.
There are differences between gambling products, like Mahjong, Poker and Toto, Big Sweep and Football betting, horse racing and to speculate in financial markets products.
Philosophical, everything in life is a gamble. Changing jobs, waking up, going out..... writing a book that may or may not sell..... .... is a gamble.
.... i need to correct myself: i don't patronise the casinos or any other forms of game of chances for financial gains.
.... but i crossed the road today when the red man was lit.... so i gambled and because i am still typing this.... i won!
.... so how? can tell me where to buy your book or not.... i want to gamble that this is a good book! -
Originally posted by Chin Eng:So got difference or not hah???
Philosophical, everything in life is a gamble. Changing jobs, waking up, going out..... writing a book that may or may not sell..... .... is a gamble.
.... i need to correct myself: i don't patronise the casinos or any other forms of game of chances for financial gains.
.... but i crossed the road today when the red man was lit.... so i gambled and because i am still typing this.... i won!
.... so how? can tell me where to buy your book or not.... i want to gamble that this is a good book! -
thanks for bumping up my thread... good coolie...
-
many differences... but they are similar in that in casino gambling you put in money hoping to win some monetary rewards... and in forex/futures you put in the "margins" hoping to win some monetary rewards...Originally posted by Chin Eng:So got difference or not hah???
Philosophical, everything in life is a gamble. Changing jobs, waking up, going out..... writing a book that may or may not sell..... .... is a gamble.
.... i need to correct myself: i don't patronise the casinos or any other forms of game of chances for financial gains.
.... but i crossed the road today when the red man was lit.... so i gambled and because i am still typing this.... i won!
.... so how? can tell me where to buy your book or not.... i want to gamble that this is a good book!
In crossing the road, you do not put in any money hoping to win some monetary rewards...
-
WHAT??Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:many differences... but they are similar in that in casino gambling you put in money hoping to win some monetary rewards... and in forex/futures you put in the "margins" hoping to win some monetary rewards...
In crossing the road, you do not put in any money hoping to win some monetary rewards...
wow, just wow. Your lack of logic is shattering my universe. -
like......
"odds ARE everything... ", it is not a sweeping statement, and " in actuality is the truth."????Originally posted by deathbait:But the fact remains that it's not a sweeping statement if it in actuality is the truth.
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.... -
and... it is shattering your universe because the logic does not start from "the truth, that is not a sweeping and the statement is "odds ARE everything?"Originally posted by deathbait:WHAT??
wow, just wow. Your lack of logic is shattering my universe. -
omg it's like you don't read anything you don't like.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You say "odds ARE everything... ", claim that it is not a sweeping statement, and say " in actuality is the truth."
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha....
I have challenged you to prove the statement a sweeping one, and all you've come up with are those annoying lol emoticons i specifically told you to stop sprouting.
It's not a sweeping statement if it's true. That's really close to the defination of what a sweeping statement is. "Every ball is red" is not a sweeping statement if you cannot find a non-red ball. If there are no exceptions, it's not sweeping.
your topic title IS a sweeping statement, because proof is readily available that sometimes, gambling or forex trading DOES pay.
But you have come up with nothing when i continually ask you for just one exception to my statement. Give me one other factor that you take in account when making investments. That's all it takes to break my argument. But you keep going round and round, pretending to laugh it off. Frankly, i expected better of a man of your supposed maturity. Right now, I'm seriously wondering which publisher actually bothered to publish a book written by a man like you.
And I especially want to attend the Q&A part of one of your supposed talks, if that's the way you answer questions. -
speak not to me that way yoda.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:and... it is shattering your universe because the logic does not start from "the truth, that is not a sweeping and the statement is "odds ARE everything?"
Once again, i must ask you to calm down and construct your sentences in a meaningful way before putting your fingers on your keyboard. -
you only view gambling insomuch as there is money involved.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:many differences... but they are similar in that in casino gambling you put in money hoping to win some monetary rewards... and in forex/futures you put in the "margins" hoping to win some monetary rewards...
In crossing the road, you do not put in any money hoping to win some monetary rewards...
crossing the road you play with something larger - your life.... of course YOUR life may be worth less that the money you have - you're entitled to this opinion.
.... but it's quite funny to see you define all the differences (as you say, so many of them) yet because of one or two similarities you define them as the same.... -
pfft i've proven many pages back that andrew has no idea what either gambling OR the forex was. Asking him for a defination is asking for trouble.Originally posted by Chin Eng:you only view gambling insomuch as there is money involved.
crossing the road you play with something larger - your life.... of course YOUR life may be worth less that the money you have - you're entitled to this opinion. -
It started with a discussable topic...Gambling, like forex trading, never pays
Some agree while some don't. Ended up with TS shooting down and "name-calling" everyone that disagrees.
In every other reply. Gross stupidity is omnipresent in every of his replies.
What's ypur point TS? May I make a guess. You are telling us that everyone who disagrees with you is equivalent to saying " 1 + 1 = 0" and that you simply have to redicule them because they are beyond redemption.
But TS have you thought of it? Is your sweeping topic actually the fact or rather like what I feel is simply your own opinions. So if you can't even prove with evidences that your statement is a fact, they are just your opinions.
So stop going around saying that anyone who opposes your fact is wrong.
Do some self reflection please. If I come out with the statement that everyone who saves are idiots and stubbornly keep to the view that I am right and that everyone who opposes must be wrong.....I will be the biggest joker myself.
I'm not saying that you are wrong, though I sincerely feel so, but I hope that you do get my point. Opinions are opinions...You do not have to start conjuring more and more untrue comments to back up your point.
And plese save any flaming for yourself. I'm not here to argue. -
Originally posted by deathbait:pfft i've proven many pages back that andrew has no idea what either gambling OR the forex was. Asking him for a defination is asking for trouble. actually my encounter with him goes way back..... sure I was wrong a couple of times (and had stated clearly that I was wrong), but most of the times, andrew writes crap, get use to it.
.... Oh.... do ask him about the book about gambling that he has purported to have written.... it's in his siggies.... all you see is a cover. Can't find it anywhere in the marketplace. -
....actually that is his style.... anyone disagreeing with him will end up having names shot onto them.... but use to it already...Originally posted by Twice A Day:It started with a discussable topic...Gambling, like forex trading, never pays
Some agree while some don't. Ended up with TS shooting down and "name-calling" everyone that disagrees.