Originally posted by googoomuck:
LetÂ’s equate an act of disbelief in a religion with accepting the terms and condition in an employment contract. If you donÂ’t accept, you donÂ’t get the job.
You accept but breach the term and conditions and youÂ’ll be shown the door. ThatÂ’s the consequence for being out of line. However, the employer may be forgiving and compassionate and let you off with a reprimand. Breach one more time and youÂ’re out.
I cannot produce evidence to convince you that a disbeliever or a transgressor goes to hell. It is also never my intention.
There are articles about near death experience that you can google if you like. ItÂ’s not the same NDP that the survivng dragon boat paddlers have experienced. They did not experience death.
The testimonies come from people who actually died momentarily in an operating table and were brought back to life by the doctors to talk about their NDP and OBE(out of body experience).
As usual, there are debunkers of NDP and there are those who debunk the debunkers of NDP.
There is one key variable when determining whether there is true free will; Duress.
Duress may be physical, spiritual or emotional. The test of whether there is true free will is whether the person presenting you with the choices threatened to cause or let some harm befall you if you do not pick a choice of his desire.
I donÂ’t think the employment contract makes a good analogy. For a start, if you refuse to sign the terms, you wonÂ’t get the job, but otherwise no harm will come to you. In other words, there is no element of duress.
I will only be robbing someone of his right to free will, if (i) I present him with a choice (say whether to pledge his allegiance to me), and (ii) create or take advantage of some circumstances unfavourable to him (say, create a fire pit) and tell him that if he does not pledge his allegiance to me I will push him into the fire pit.
It is not my intention to require you to present evidence that disbelievers will go to hell. I am arguing from a doctrinal point of viewÂ… Also, please understand that I am not arguing against your religion. I am arguing against the ethical fallacy of PascalÂ’s wager.