Originally posted by extrinsic:
cat is a male... he just quoting articles from other plc... yet so many just read the contents, and forget abt the headers/footers...
i dun like spg, but i can understand how they feel.
compare an ang mo: tall, handsome, rich, polite, knowledgable, interesting, enjoy life, generous. (these are the "norm" perception of ang mo by them)
to sg guys: complaining, grumbling, short (compare to ang mo), rigid, uninteresting, not fun to be with, mcp, miser. (these are the "norm" perception of sg guys by them)
who u tink the gers wld choose?
if gers are not choosing sg guys, i tink we guys have to reflect on outselves first. do u complain? grumble? miser? mcp? not fun? boring?
What sort of logic is that?
As far as I'm concerned, economic theories apply to many facets of life and relationships are no different.
If guys had to reflect on themselves because they aren't attracting the attention of women, have you ever wondered what sort of calibre are such women to begin with? For a start, if such women were that desirable, they wouldn't even need to go through the hassle of drawing a shortlist of what she wants her guy to be, would she?
This whole issue has got nothing to do with the gender, breed or ethnicity to begin with - if someone's shallow, he/she is shallow. You can't do anything about it - it isn't worth doing much about it either. The fact of the matter is shallow people exists in all shapes and sizes - and come in all genders, ethnicity and nationality.
