Just a wake-up call
-
Originally posted by [J]erry:
yes.. thats what im trying to say..
if you put all your cannon horse and car at the wrong position they will get eaten up right?
so you have to make use of them..
is like you are going to work in a car industry and what for u call the CEO of FarEast organization?
i agree with parn.. me too hate those people who think they are a big shit if they know somebody..
If i work in the car industry as marketing, I'll call the CEO of FarEast organization to ask for permission to do a roadshow in their premise... Why not?and erm... this might sound rude but refer to his first post as quoted below:
"Is it by knowing the AMOUNT of people who are influential?
OR
Is it by knowing the influential people themselves?"
He's refering to knowing the amount and not the ppl who know someone big... as quoted in ur post...
-
is it possible for just 1 queen or king to win an entire chess game?
-
Originally posted by parn:
It wasn't a bad analogy, it is just beyond your comprehension that's all.Are you so ashamed to admit that you do not understand my post?
And I'm not going to waste my time to explain it to you when you do not have the intention to participate in this discussion.
Take a look at your own post first before you pick on others.
It's a bad analogy because neither of your situations are realistic enough. A chess game is also a battle of wits and minds, a battle of patience, a battle of considerations and experience. Neither having multiple pieces nor knowing the pieces well only will win you the game.Similarly, from your post
Is it by knowing the AMOUNT of people who are influential?
OR
Is it by knowing the influential people themselves?
Both are wrong. But I guess you are only capable of rambling till here; you don't have the intellectual capability to bring it further yourself.
I have given you a clue on how to bring it further in the second statement of this post. Go ponder.
-
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
If i work in the car industry as marketing, I'll call the CEO of FarEast organization to ask for permission to do a roadshow in their premise... Why not?and erm... this might sound rude but refer to his first post as quoted below:
"Is it by knowing the AMOUNT of people who are influential?
OR
Is it by knowing the influential people themselves?"
He's refering to knowing the amount and not the ppl who know someone big... as quoted in ur post...
that is when u are in the car industry as marketing..
my meaning is when u going to start the job in the car industry
what for u call far east boss and tell him u going to work in this place..
so he can come and buy car from u?is contacting the right people at the right time
then again.. u need to know Both influential and of cos the more amount the better
why not?
okay.. u got a point sorry if i mis-interpreted
-
Originally posted by [J]erry:
that is when u are in the car industry as marketing..
my meaning is when u going to start the job in the car industry
what for u call far east boss and tell him u going to work in this place..
so he can come and buy car from u?is contacting the right people at the right time
then again.. u need to know Both influential and of cos the more amount the better
why not?
okay.. u got a point sorry if i mis-interpreted
I understand... it's ok... It's just that we both got a point but when we express wrongly, it became a wrong idea...
-
In a game of chess, win or lose is one matter, but the most important is to learn from it. Same goes to human, Seeking power and winning mentality is our natural ego, therefore one must be able to understand that power and winning needs learning, not an overnite story. In many a time, due to impatient and not understand that losing is part of a learning curve, one meet his/her downfall while seeking power and trying desparately to win, cos one will get angry in thing that do not conform to one wishes and therefore do the stupid things.
-
Originally posted by [J]erry:
For example Chinese chess
Before you know how to play the chess you need to know some of these chess funtions..
like car, cannon, horse how are they able to move
so its how you use those CEOs to win the game.they are like the horse,cannon, car one of the main general of the game which can help u win the game easiler
you can win with 5 soliders but.. it will take a long time isn'it?
if you dont' even know those chess how are you suppose to win the game?
a solider is very useful but if u imploy them in to a wrong position they are dead for sure
Yes, I can explain to you.People know many people in real lives, and they come from different background with different talents/achievements.
Treat them as real life chess pieces and imagine the chessboard as a situation that you need to overcome.
Do you stand a better chance of overcoming your situation if you:
1) Know many people but you don't really know them that well or close enough for them to help you when you needed them.
2) Know a few people and you are close enough with them to know that they are willing to render help to you anytime.
As compared to the chess pieces on a chessboard, is the player more likely to win because:
1) The player has many chess pieces left on the chessboard that the player could use to win the game
2) The player know how to use a few chess pieces effectively and focused/depended on those few chess pieces to play a major role in the gameplan of the chess game
To clear up the confusion, the chess is referring to English Chess.
But the discussion isn't about chess. It is meant to wake people up and see for themselves if the people they know are really influential or are they themselves really as influential as they exclaimed.
-
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
Well no offense but that's a very bad analog -___-Parn's trying to state that having more chess piece does not = to winning the chess game... It's knowing how to use them wisely and not just knowing how to move them...
You catch my drift....I'm very pleased and impressed. -
Originally posted by parn:
Yes, I can explain to you.People know many people in real lives, and they come from different background with different talents/achievements.
Treat them as real life chess pieces and imagine the chessboard as a situation that you need to overcome.
Do you stand a better chance of overcoming your situation if you:
1) Know many people but you don't really know them that well or close enough for them to help you when you needed them.
2) Know a few people and you are close enough with them to know that they are willing to render help to you anytime.
As compared to the chess pieces on a chessboard, is the player more likely to win because:
1) The player has many chess pieces left on the chessboard that the player could use to win the game
2) The player know how to use a few chess pieces effectively and focused/depended on those few chess pieces to play a major role in the gameplan of the chess game
To clear up the confusion, the chess is referring to English Chess.
But the discussion isn't about chess. It is meant to wake people up and see for themselves if the people they know are really influential or are they themselves really as influential as they exclaimed.
This is indeed a better explanation... -
Originally posted by Moose Knuckle:
Some people are worthless trash who only know how to throw names around to show how 'cool' or 'powerful' they are. For example, they will say "Hey I know XXX, we are good friends what!" but in reality, XXX do not even know of the so-called good friend's pathetic existence (I went to ask XXX about it).
So yeah, time to wake up. Power by association is just temporary and you never know the person you are bragging to may be a blood relative or a good friend of the influential person you pretend to know.
Yes, you have also caught my drift.......I'm impressed too even though you have expressed it bluntly.Thanks.
-
Originally posted by parn:
Yes, I can explain to you.People know many people in real lives, and they come from different background with different talents/achievements.
Treat them as real life chess pieces and imagine the chessboard as a situation that you need to overcome.
Do you stand a better chance of overcoming your situation if you:
1) Know many people but you don't really know them that well or close enough for them to help you when you needed them.
2) Know a few people and you are close enough with them to know that they are willing to render help to you anytime.
As compared to the chess pieces on a chessboard, is the player more likely to win because:
1) The player has many chess pieces left on the chessboard that the player could use to win the game
2) The player know how to use a few chess pieces effectively and focused/depended on those few chess pieces to play a major role in the gameplan of the chess game
To clear up the confusion, the chess is referring to English Chess.
But the discussion isn't about chess. It is meant to wake people up and see for themselves if the people they know are really influential or are they themselves really as influential as they exclaimed.
more or less the same... sorry but i don't know english chess..
2) Know a few people and you are close enough with them to know that they are willing to render help to you anytime.
Even better if u know more cos. but of cos must be close
2) The player know how to use a few chess pieces effectively and focused/depended on those few chess pieces to play a major role in the gameplan of the chess game
indeed, but when those player chess pieces got eaten up.. lets say he disappear in the industry.. you are game over.. don't say the person can't eat you cause you are good at that particular chracter..yi shan hai you yi shan gao
-
nvr play Initial D already ah?
-
Originally posted by Pin Head:
It's a bad analogy because neither of your situations are realistic enough. A chess game is also a battle of wits and minds, a battle of patience, a battle of considerations and experience. Neither having multiple pieces nor knowing the pieces well only will win you the game.Similarly, from your post
Both are wrong. But I guess you are only capable of rambling till here; you don't have the intellectual capability to bring it further yourself.
I have given you a clue on how to bring it further in the second statement of this post. Go ponder.
Ha Ha ...Let's move on before Pin Head transform into an angry troll.
-
Originally posted by Daisuke-kun:
nvr play Initial D already ah?
I stopped playing Initial D on my PS3 already. -
Originally posted by Daisuke-kun:
nvr play Initial D already ah?
My initial D prefer grip style...
-
Originally posted by parn:
Yes, I can explain to you.People know many people in real lives, and they come from different background with different talents/achievements.
Treat them as real life chess pieces and imagine the chessboard as a situation that you need to overcome.
Do you stand a better chance of overcoming your situation if you:
1) Know many people but you don't really know them that well or close enough for them to help you when you needed them.
2) Know a few people and you are close enough with them to know that they are willing to render help to you anytime.
As compared to the chess pieces on a chessboard, is the player more likely to win because:
1) The player has many chess pieces left on the chessboard that the player could use to win the game
2) The player know how to use a few chess pieces effectively and focused/depended on those few chess pieces to play a major role in the gameplan of the chess game
To clear up the confusion, the chess is referring to English Chess.
But the discussion isn't about chess. It is meant to wake people up and see for themselves if the people they know are really influential or are they themselves really as influential as they exclaimed.
The first part is well explained.The second part on chess is still wrong. If you don't know chess well enough, you shouldn't use it as an analogy. A chessmaster will make each and every single chess piece play a major role. Not just a few major pieces. That is suicide. But who knows, you might like committing suicide. It's again a first part good read followed by a second part "huh?" read, much like your very first post again.
-
Originally posted by parn:
I stopped playing Initial D on my PS3 already.last 4-5years got ps3 meh?
-
Originally posted by [J]erry:
more or less the same... sorry but i don't know english chess..
2) Know a few people and you are close enough with them to know that they are willing to render help to you anytime.
Even better if u know more cos. but of cos must be close
2) The player know how to use a few chess pieces effectively and focused/depended on those few chess pieces to play a major role in the gameplan of the chess game
indeed, but when those player chess pieces got eaten up.. lets say he disappear in the industry.. you are game over.. don't say the person can't eat you cause you are good at that particular chracter..yi shan hai you yi shan gao
indeed, but when those player chess pieces got eaten up.. lets say he disappear in the industry.. you are game over.. don't say the person can't eat you cause you are good at that particular chracter..yi shan hai you yi shan gao
In chess, if you only know "how to use a few chess pieces effectively and focused/depended on those few chess pieces to play a major role in the gameplan of the chess game", an opponent simply needs to sacrifice some pieces to remove those 'major' pieces of yours, and you will be left handicapped. You have to know every single piece well.Similarly, in life, depending on a few influential people whom you are closed to is only a short term, short sighted strategy; your 'opponents' in life will simply remove your support from you.
-
Originally posted by Daisuke-kun:
last 4-5years got ps3 meh?
How come you asking me this retarded question?You really don't know the answer is it?
-
-
Originally posted by Pin Head:
The first part is well explained.The second part on chess is still wrong. If you don't know chess well enough, you shouldn't use it as an analogy. A chessmaster will make each and every single chess piece play a major role. Not just a few major pieces. That is suicide. But who knows, you might like committing suicide. It's again a first part good read followed by a second part "huh?" read, much like your very first post again.
Everybody is capable of commenting on other people's post.The difference between people is whether they get it or they don't.
You don't get it now, but you might get it next time.
When it's time to move on, it takes alot of courage to take the first step and move on. And I believed you have that courage to move on.
-
so now, you don't think he has the courage to move on.. okay..
-
I'm pretty sure you are smart enough to get my drift about chess and life.
The difference is whether you have the courage to admit it.
-
Originally posted by Pin Head:
I'm pretty sure you are smart enough to get my drift about chess and life.
The difference is whether you have the courage to admit it.
. seriously. -
what ever it is, i for one comprehend completely zit of this entire thingum whatever you call it.
ok fine, i think i can still at least connect with the cutesy smileys at some level.