It is not like that because we cannot count the number of all sentient beings.
The number is unknown.
Originally posted by caleb_chiang:then like that... wouldn't the world run out of souls? as in the population is like 10 times millions of years ago... wouldn't people on the earth is living without a soul within them???
Haha.
There is this thing going on also about how we will burn those paper money for the dead to spend in hell.
Don't know which religion does this belief falls into but it is kindda amusing.
Maybe somebody from hell comes to earth and tell his son that he is hungry in hell as he has no money to eat and hell is like earth, need to pay money for anything that you want. Than the son goes around and tell everyone about this and from than on until now everyone has been buring money for their dead ancestors.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Scientists at Harvard University have
shown, for the first time, that intelligence varies among individual monkeys
within a species – in this case, the cotton-top tamarin.
Testing for
broad cognitive ability, the researchers identified high, middle, and low
performing monkeys, determined by a general intelligence score. General
intelligence, or "g," is a hallmark of human cognition, often described as
similar to IQ. The effect of "g" in primates may offer insight into the
evolution of human general intelligence.
The study, published this week
in the journal PLoS One, is the first to examine differences of broad cognitive
ability in primates within a single species. Previous studies of general
intelligence in primates primarily concerned variation between species.
The research was led by Konika Banerjee, a research assistant in the
Department of Psychology at Harvard University. Banerjee's co-authors are Marc
Hauser, professor of psychology, and James J. Lee all of Harvard, along with
Christopher Chabris of Union College, Fritz Tsao of Hillsdale College, and Valen
Johnson of the University of Texas Medical School at Houston.
"We found
that there was substantial individual variation in performance on these tasks,"
says Banerjee. "A significant proportion of that variation can actually be
accounted for by something that looks very similar to the general intelligence,
or 'g' factor, in humans. It appears to be the case that tamarins have something
very similar to our general intelligence."
General intelligence, or "g,"
refers to the positive correlation of an individual's performance on various
subtasks within an intelligence test. Banerjee and her colleagues found that "g"
accounted for 20 percent of the monkeys' performance on the tasks in the study.
The remaining 80 percent of the variation in performance was due to
task-specific or environmental circumstances in testing the monkeys.
While not a direct comparison, human "g" accounts for 40 to 60 percent
of the variation in an individual's performance on the various subtasks of an IQ
test. It may be that an increase in the magnitude of "g" was integral to the
evolution of the human brain.
"General intelligence is an important
component of human intelligence, but it is also possible that it relies upon
ancient neural substrates," says Banerjee. "If different primate taxa differ in
the magnitude of 'g,' with humans standing out from the rest of the pack, this
might help explain how we, uniquely, can combine thoughts from different domains
of knowledge to create new representations of the world. This cognitive domain
general ability, captured by 'g,' is something that you might see to varying
degrees in other primate taxa."
This study was conducted among 22
cotton-top tamarins, who were administered 11 unique tasks designed to assess
different cognitive functions including working memory, executive control,
information processing speed, and inhibitory control. For some tasks, the
monkeys' goal was to obtain a piece of food, but this was not the case for all
of the tasks. Monkeys with higher "g" scores tended to outperform monkeys with
lower scores across the various subtasks in the cognitive task battery.
This particular set of tasks was developed for this study, but Banerjee
hopes that it or other similar task batteries might be applied to future studies
of primate general intelligence, to develop a standardized test for cognitive
ability that could be administered to many species.
"We called our
cognitive task battery the 'monkey IQ test' very crudely," says Banerjee. "It's
a fun way to think about it, but to be more accurate, I would say that we are
looking at global cognitive ability across an array of tasks that span multiple
cognitive domains."
###
Harvard University
Originally posted by Bangulzai:homo sapiens started to acquire 2 free hands to do more things
until they found out that PCC requires only one hand.
Originally posted by BadzMaro:So.. u guys think they still evolving ? the monkees i mean. lol!
When the monkeys and orang utans evolve to become like us , we will evolve to another dimension liaw is it ? lol
I dont think monkeys evolve that much so soon.For example,once an Orangutan 250,000 years ago still an orangutan today (also see Chewbaca for good comparison).So how homosapiens came to be is one big mystery to me (see chewbaca for another comparison)
Originally posted by Short Ninja:
I dont think monkeys evolve that much so soon.For example,once an Orangutan 250,000 years ago still an orangutan today (also see Chewbaca for good comparison).So how homosapiens came to be is one big mystery to me (see chewbaca for another comparison)
Ask George Lucas.![]()