All out to defame our governement
-
a nice long argument on-going....
-
Hehehe
Nobody's arguing with him, he's so wasted.
Just showing the error of his logic. -
a)http://www.singstat.gov.sg/papers/seminar/income2000.pdfOriginally posted by Rock^Star :
To clarify, this piece of statistic is not meant to show Singapore's economic situation. Its main purpose is to illustrate average income per household by decile from the lowest 10% to the top 10%. Did you not understand that?Originally posted by Gazelle:
1) We are interested to know if there is infact a wage growth in Singapore for the past 10 years, NOT widening income gap issue as it has been discussed in another thread.
2) I donÂ’t see what is the point using statistic that stops at 2000 to discuss about current issue here in Singapore.
b)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore
The above links all show that the higher income groups get bigger increases over time, in relation to the lower income households. Doesn't that mean the higher income groups are the main contributors to raising the mean and/or median income levels, and not actually wage increases among singaporeans as a whole?
Again, there is no "super current" study done that show income distribution and income shifts over a 10 year period. Maybe you should try to prove otherwise, disprove the claims of others or come up with more current statistics to support your claims, like what some of the rest have been doing.
Think there is a link somewhere in another thread that has 2003 figures in a less comprehensive study, if a kind sould could post it here as well, will be greatly appreciated. -
That joker seems to think that there are reports to suit his whims and fancies.Originally posted by Jontst78:a)http://www.singstat.gov.sg/papers/seminar/income2000.pdf
b)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore
The above links all show that the higher income groups get bigger increases over time, in relation to the lower income households. Doesn't that mean the higher income groups are the main contributors to raising the mean and/or median income levels, and not actually wage increases among singaporeans as a whole?
Again, there is no "super current" study done that show income distribution and income shifts over a 10 year period. Maybe you should try to prove otherwise, disprove the claims of others or come up with more current statistics to support your claims, like what some of the rest have been doing.
Think there is a link somewhere in another thread that has 2003 figures in a less comprehensive study, if a kind sould could post it here as well, will be greatly appreciated. -
This topic is getting derailed
Its supposed to be whether people are all out the defame the government
Not about economics....
Ok, going to start new thread, hopefully more exciting..
-
With the 3 stooges around, this forum will definitely be interesting.Originally posted by Jontst78:This topic is getting derailed
Its supposed to be whether people are all out the defame the government
Not about economics....
Ok, going to start new thread, hopefully more exciting.. -
What did you expect when we have 3 moronic bulls who seek nothing less than to impose their opinions on us? They don't believe in seeking our point, they only believe in theirs as absolute truths. Thus far, all they have done is harp the Govt's view and nothing that can be regarded as their own original viewpoint. Ridiculous.Originally posted by Jontst78:This topic is getting derailed
Its supposed to be whether people are all out the defame the government
Not about economics....
Ok, going to start new thread, hopefully more exciting.. -
Think he has gone for lunch, afterall government don't expect him to be sitting here without any lunch break.
-
hey thanks, you just contributed point 9.Originally posted by maurizio13:Hehehe
In another previous post, I had to argue with him regarding the phrase "free market business", he said there's no such phrase because he has never heard of it. After posting links to a news archive, where a journalist used the phrase "free market business", he was still adamant in insisting that no such phrase exist.
B***S**T Gazelle:
9) Any words or terms not heard by Gazelle is not an official term or word in the dictionary. This implies that the following words are not in the dictionary:
- Humility
- Consideration
- Kindness
- Graciousness
Becoz as far as we can see from here, he doesn't exhibit any of the above, so I can safely assume he thinks such words are not in the dictionary coz he has never heard of them before -
sigh, you are a BIG joke.Originally posted by Gazelle:obviously you cant count to 10 with your fingers, can you? Didnt I say 10 years?
Stop changing the topic.
Just admit that there are statistics and facts proving that the wages of middle income has stagnated.
You asked proof for the past 10 years, we gave you a posting that shows for the past 5 years, there's proof, and you keep harping on 10 years.
Why, the number 10 so magic for you is it? one of your toto numbers ah? -
don't need to start a new thread, he will go there and create havoc.Originally posted by Jontst78:This topic is getting derailed
Its supposed to be whether people are all out the defame the government
Not about economics....
Ok, going to start new thread, hopefully more exciting..
Just pass the verdict that the joker cannot sift facts and opinions, and keep harping on his own opinions, then we close his case and move on to talk about your actual topic.
Just ignore the ignorant. Its so difficult to explain abstract theories to frogs in wells. We have to bring our intelligence down to his level to try to help him.
How to help him, when he doesn't help himself, and deludes himself consistently? -
1) Those links that you provided are useless in the context of the orgininal discussion,Originally posted by Jontst78:a)http://www.singstat.gov.sg/papers/seminar/income2000.pdf
b)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore
The above links all show that the higher income groups get bigger increases over time, in relation to the lower income households. Doesn't that mean the higher income groups are the main contributors to raising the mean and/or median income levels, and not actually wage increases among singaporeans as a whole?
Again, there is no "super current" study done that show income distribution and income shifts over a 10 year period. Maybe you should try to prove otherwise, disprove the claims of others or come up with more current statistics to support your claims, like what some of the rest have been doing.
Think there is a link somewhere in another thread that has 2003 figures in a less comprehensive study, if a kind sould could post it here as well, will be greatly appreciated.
2) If you want to discuss about income widening gap issues, please go to
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=250502&page=3
3) Can I claim that your father is a gay and your real father PM Lee, without giving facts to support my claim and in return I will ask you to provide proofs that he is straight and PM Lee is not your biological father? -
Soul_rage, stop trying lah...if your intention is to start a flame war, why not start a new thread and name it Gazelle or something, I am sure all many whiners will come support you.Originally posted by soul_rage:don't need to start a new thread, he will go there and create havoc.
Just pass the verdict that the joker cannot sift facts and opinions, and keep harping on his own opinions, then we close his case and move on to talk about your actual topic.
Just ignore the ignorant. Its so difficult to explain abstract theories to frogs in wells. We have to bring our intelligence down to his level to try to help him.
How to help him, when he doesn't help himself, and deludes himself consistently?
Before you go any further, do you have comments on the BS you have said in this forum?
1) Protectionism is good for Singapore's future and it promotes investment like IRs
2) Open economy is bad for Singapore and its people
3) There is a 80/20 rule in income distribution
4) If SIA doest threat you well, you should consider leaving the country.
f) By awarding Singapore IRs to both foreign companies, is it an example of protectionism
g) Local and foreign companies offer the same benefits to Singapore's future and economy
h) All casino gaming operators can operate world class IR by themselves
i) Singapore employer are suckers for more expensive Indian FT
j) Government should not outsource project to overseas companies even if it is better value for money.
k) S-league foreign footballers are all highly educated individual
l) You need to be highly educated to be consider a talent.
m) Income gap = living standard
n) Singapore government is pro rich people, not pro business -
Are you willing to kiss my hairy butt and call me daddy if I can provide statistic to show you that there is REAL wage growth in Singapore is not just benefiting the rich?Originally posted by maurizio13:That joker seems to think that there are reports to suit his whims and fancies.
PS, just reply YES or NO, dont give me grandmother story. -
Hehehe.......Originally posted by Gazelle:Are you willing to kiss my hairy butt and call me daddy if I can provide statistic to show you that there is REAL wage growth in Singapore is not just benefiting the rich?
PS, just reply YES or NO, dont give me grandmother story.
Hairy butt!!!
Only thing I know with hairy butts are animals. I don't see many homo sapiens with hairy butts. Are you implying that you are a baboon (since you have some semblance of human features)? -
YES or NO?Originally posted by maurizio13:Hehehe.......
Hairy butt!!!
Only thing I know with hairy butts are animals. I don't see many homo sapiens with hairy butts. Are you implying that you are a baboon (since you have some semblance of human features)? -
Would you let me ejaculate in your mouth if I show you proof that 43% of Singaporeans make less than $2,000 wages a month?Originally posted by Gazelle:YES or NO?
Yes or no? -
I am just guessing.Originally posted by Gazelle:1) Those links that you provided are useless in the context of the orgininal discussion,
2) If you want to discuss about income widening gap issues, please go to
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=250502&page=3
3) Can I claim that your father is a gay and your real father PM Lee, without giving facts to support my claim and in return I will ask you to provide proofs that he is straight and PM Lee is not your biological father?
Judging from the time you went MIA at around 12noon to your first reply at 2pm. Your daily frequent post in sgForums, are you doing this as a job? I have a funny feeling that you must be quite a high ranking propaganda officer (2 hours lunch time) in one of the Ministries (support government's policy at all cost, even at the expense of looking like a baboon). -
Either that, or he is jobless.Originally posted by maurizio13:I am just guessing.
Judging from the time you went MIA at around 12noon to your first reply at 2pm. Your daily frequent post in sgForums, are you doing this as a job? I have a funny feeling that you must be quite a high ranking propaganda officer (2 hours lunch time) in one of the Ministries (support government's policy at all cost, even at the expense of looking like a baboon).
It is technically a misuse of company's resources to go to forums during office time. Either he is paid to do this, or he has nothing better to do. -
These are the few possibilities, but I don't think he is jobless. If he were jobless and marginalised by the system, he would be talking against the system and not for it. He left the forum around 12noon and came back 2pm, shows that he can't be at home, because the timing is too regimental. To have 2 hours lunch time is very generous, that's why I think he is quite high ranking.Originally posted by Fingolfin_Noldor:Either that, or he is jobless.
It is technically a misuse of company's resources to go to forums during office time. Either he is paid to do this, or he has nothing better to do.
So only 3 possibilities:
1) misusing company's resources
2) paid to do this
3) nothing better to do
The 3 possibilities apply only when he is sane, else a fourth would materialise, 4) he is mad. -
Why should I even border to answer you when I have never disagree with you on the above statement.Originally posted by maurizio13:Would you let me ejaculate in your mouth if I show you proof that 43% of Singaporeans make less than $2,000 wages a month?
Yes or no?
However since you proudly claim that there are no reportS to support my claim that there is REAL wage increase in Singapore, will you be willing to take up the gazelle's chanllenge?
common, you talk like a hero in this forum, I am sure you must have the balls to stand by what you said? -
Ermmm.....Originally posted by Gazelle:Why should I even border to answer you when I have never disagree with you on the above statement.
However since you proudly claim that there are no reportS to support my claim that there is REAL wage increase in Singapore, will you be willing to take up the gazelle's chanllenge?
common, you talk like a hero in this forum, I am sure you must have the balls to stand by what you said?
If you have information to support your argument, you can just post it. No need for all this bullsh|t. This is not a game of poker, it's an open debate. -
It is meaningless to assume who I am and what I do for a living. Just cut the chase and let me know if you willing to take up the gazelle challenge?Originally posted by maurizio13:I am just guessing.
Judging from the time you went MIA at around 12noon to your first reply at 2pm. Your daily frequent post in sgForums, are you doing this as a job? I have a funny feeling that you must be quite a high ranking propaganda officer (2 hours lunch time) in one of the Ministries (support government's policy at all cost, even at the expense of looking like a baboon). -
Really? can I accuse you of a man with no dic.k and ask you to post a naked picture of you sucking a banana?Originally posted by maurizio13:Ermmm.....
If you have information to support your argument, you can just post it. No need for all this bu||shit. This is not a game of poker, it's an open debate.
If you dont have what it takes stand by what you said, just speak less. -
Ok.Originally posted by Gazelle:It is meaning to assume who I am and what I do for a living. Just cut the chase and let me know if you willing to take up the gazelle challenge?
I am petrified.
Keep the information to yourself. We are not interested in knowing.