Originally posted by Hajime:
Don't worry lah, Andy will get his chance soon, since his acting improved so much. I mean, jiang nan ting yi dian, if even Jackie Chan had won it before, then Andy will stand a good chance. I felt the award to Jackie Chan some years ago was more to recognise him for his contribution to movies rather than for his acting. Frankly, Stephen Chow is a much more better actor than Jackie Chan, if you have seen more serious SC's shows before.
For those who had watched IA3, who do you think was better - Tony or Andy? How about the rest? Don't quite understand why Kelly was given so much limelight - she was the only female sandwiched among the 6 guys in the posters. Did she have a much bigger role in IA3 than 1? Her on-screen was much lesser than even Sammi in IA1, if I didn't remember wrongly. Most importantly, was she any good?
i hope andy gets his chance soon too! he's waited too long, and this was actually a good show, juz too bad tony was nominated oso
As for IA3, he did a good job, probably coz of his role too, as a man who is trying hard to diff between good and bad, and trying to be good man, but got all lost again, (ya, and got me quite lost as well)
the show was mainly him & leon lai.
probably i'll go watch it on vcd once more to try to understand the show again lol
frankly, i couldn't focus on everyone's performance, becoz i was also trying to sort out who is doing what, who is the whose spy, and whose id had already been exposed, and drooling at tony leung =XX.... but my attn was more on andy and tony coz i prefer them. hqs & eric tseng had smaller part in this show.
oh, but i wanna comment on this other guy, the one who acted as sha qiang, he's really cute, brought some comic effects to the show.
yes, kelly had a bigger role than IA 1, she was the only female who appear long enough; sammi had a few sec shot only; carina lau, i think only 1 sec.........
leaving office for now...bye guys!