Originally posted by Kenashi:of course, I got plenty of gal friends.
no choice, I am in the ladies infested working environment.![]()
errrr, just my guy friends all said I am gender biased.Originally posted by FeowFeow:You also very charming towards them mah
FeowFeow
Originally posted by Kenashi:errrr, just my guy friends all said I am gender biased.![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by sweetevil:Do you believe in having pure platonic friendship with the opposite gender?
I dun believe in pure platonic friendship. Either party will to a certain extent, no matter how minute, harbour some liking. My 2 cents tho.Originally posted by sweetevil:Do you believe in having pure platonic friendship with the opposite gender?
Originally posted by Tuatau:Ho ho... no. Told you not to take it the wrong way. Really didn't mean any offence.
Have already mentioned that platonic friendship between a married woman and a single man could be possible, but believed it was more the exception than the rule. You could be one of the exceptions whom I have yet to come across in real life.
Couldn't say the same between a married man and a single woman, though. Perhaps my social circle is too small, but there is probably no married woman I've known who is perfectly comfortable with her husband going out alone with a single woman.
Originally posted by Haze|:i do believe in pure platonic friendship
but it's really rare..
Originally posted by smudgey:One has never denied the possibility, less even TOTALLY. One has merely considered how high (or low) the probability could be.
I think this is possible no matter with single men and women, mareid men single women, maried woman and single man. or even among attach men and women....
the key think is understanding where you stand.
I have many guy friends whom i know makes great bf or husbands but we have understanding that we will always be friends and nothing more
admittedly, there are affections between us... but are'nt there suppose to be affection of some sorts between friends? it's once again knowing your standing. not only your own but your friends. make sure both of u know where you stand and there's no problem. but if even you feel that the understanding is greyed... then it's time to draw back and make things clear.
Sometime i use hints like "Thank goodness i have a buddy like you to listen to me bitch!!! hehehe " or something along these lines,...
Platonic relationships is TOTALLY possible!!!
Originally posted by Yunhaier:Say, the other party didn't share your belief, then it probably still wouldn't work even though you may have believed in such friendships, would it?Like prayers AND Love at First Sight - only works if you believed in them.
Originally posted by FeowFeow:Many guys areIt's normal
There's this friend of mine from Hawaii, talk to guys got all the swear words, but talk to the girls very nice & gentle
I think the world of him, actually, he's always willing to help people, whether guys or girls (just that with guys, he's less refined)
But the guy friends all call him "Mr Aloha"
FeowFeow
must have mutual understanding on where each stand. If it is one sided, the friendship just might fail if the one of them is stubborn.Originally posted by Tuatau:Say, the other party didn't share your belief, then it probably still wouldn't work even though you may have believed in such friendships, would it?
eh ... i find the analogy a bit self-fulfilling.Originally posted by Tuatau:Would you still want to chat with your opposite-sex-best-friends after marriage through the wee hours of the night, assuming you used to do it when you were young? (Incidentally, why would your opposite-sex-best-friend be someone else other than the person sleeping next to you?)
Originally posted by eyonx:OK, then. We put aside the definition, and talk about the expectations. So tell us:
eh ... i find the analogy a bit self-fulfilling.
the pertinent issue isn't with the definition of friendship.
but rather it is the expectations carried by either/both parties into the relationship that will determine where it will go if the expectations are not met.
Originally posted by alexkusu:May I ask why you would want a really pretty girl to be a sister, and not to be a girlfriend?
Its is possible. If the girls are really pretty, and its hard not to fall in love with them, they become my god-sisters...cos once I apply the label 'sister' to them, my mind will block all amourous attempts consciously and subconsciously.
hahah ... looks like the loaded trick question has juz changed packaging :-pOriginally posted by Tuatau:Would you still expect yourself or your partner to chat with opposite-sex-best-friends after marriage through the wee hours of the night, assuming you used to do it when you were young?
Originally posted by eyonx:Between close opposite-sex friends, there could still exist a platonic relationship, no?
if we were to consider for the possibility of platonic relationships using the above, the question implies that in most cases, friends chat with each other in the dead of the night. close friends? likely so, platonic ones? contentious.
i would assert, without evidence, that in general one is likely to have more platonic ones than close ones. ie agree that platonic relations are possible.
perhaps the reality is juz that many people go into a relationship expecting more than they appear to be?
Originally posted by Tuatau:as was my point. but then giving this scenario raises other consideration.
Between close opposite-sex friends, there could still exist a platonic relationship, no?
In these cases, the girl is very close to both guys, but she insists that the friendship between her and the best friend is strictly platonic. (Whether the best guy friend also thinks the same way or he is just biding his time, only he has the answer.)
So whether or not a friendship is platonic, may not necessarily be dependent on how close the two parties are. That was why one has emphasised on the definition... or rather "expectations " -- in your own words -- both parties carry into the relationship.agreed.![]()
However, looking at the thread-starting post, if the friendship did not imply a certain level of closeness or intimacy, why would the poster ask the question then? That's where the rhetorical... or rather "loaded trick question" comes in handy -- to make sure readers would be on the same page as to the level of closeness or intimacy in the supposedly-platonic friendship that one was referring to:okays at least now i see where you are coming from.
Is it possible to share that kind of intimacy with a platonic close friend of the opposite sex when the person is no longer single and available?personally, i find the notion of segregating friends interesting.