Originally posted by curiousOrange:In fact, that's where the contradiction comes in although I get where you're coming from. You're effectively advocating a zero sum game with virtually no risk exposure - hence, the belief in the guy should be the one doing the initiation, yet emphasising on the need to protect himself.
I admire your train of thoughts.
First of all, I will clarify that what IÂ’ve written so far has nothing to do with whether a guy should initiate or not.
A guy must do the initiation.
Not because of some romantic idea that if two people are mutually interested, things should flow naturally.
I guess IÂ’m not like you in that sense.
A guy does the initiation simply because he has the balls to do so.
Originally posted by curiousOrange:Putting it bluntly, I find your perspective rather thought-provoking. That said, just let me clarify on some issues which I suppose you haven't clearly understood.
When I write about leaving out exceptions and protecting your heart. It applies to the initial stage.
Your take is this; one should not be too afraid to jump in.
One should not be too afraid to love.
Love and trust should flow naturally when both parties are mutually attracted.
I would like you to pause for a moment and ponder about this:
On what basis do you love this woman?
On what basis do you trust this person?
The gradual establishment of trust and loyalty over time is vital in any relationship.
By sticking to rather stringent criterions in the initial stage, you have almost guaranteed yourself a woman with good potential to be accommodating in a relationship.
This will make your life much easier when you have to maintain the relationship if you are thinking of something long term.
Originally posted by curiousOrange:Admittedly, much of what we have discussed centres very much on the character of the man and woman in question and what they both want in each other. Obviously, if you put an egoist and a sycophant together, then chances are your method would stand a better chance of pulling a deal off - for ultimately, ironically, an insecure woman who looks excessively to a man for security would, in all probability, satisfy the equally-insecure bloke's need for a validation and endorsement of his self-worth (in such a case, although both parties are insecure, they pretty much look for validation of their self-worth in different, yet complimentary ways).
Gradually, you will get to understand this person more.
ThatÂ’s when you allow exceptions to come in, when you find that you really have faith and trust her enough to do so.
Protecting yourself in the initial stage does not undermine the more mature form of love that will develop in the later stage.
I see where you are coming from as well.
It sounds calculated. It sounds mechanical.
It doesnÂ’t feel like love at the initial stage.
Love ought to be reckless, preferably with a nice tinge of pain involved.
But on the other hand, if you donÂ’t put yourself in the first place, no one will.
How come in shows i always see those rather plump girls doing this?Originally posted by Stoat:when she tink u nt looking she smile secretly to herself and play wif her hair![]()
![]()
![]()
FYI, what crysantimum, me only take Aloe Vera.Originally posted by ifish:u obviously have no idea who u give ur crysantimun too![]()
![]()
![]()
Hmmm u look like one that had been hurt badly by guys in the past...Originally posted by angel7030:Please lah, what era already, still flower here and there. Today gal dun fancy flower one lah. Show money better ya, dun waste money on flower ok
You deserve multiple high fives.Originally posted by walesa:In truth, in such instances, much as many may not share my views, I actually do not sympathise with the women who think they have been led on by guys and if anything, it's the guys who have done right by them.
I do not advocate a game with no risk exposure, it would be insane to even think of achieving that.Originally posted by walesa:You're effectively advocating a zero sum game with virtually no risk exposure - hence, the belief in the guy should be the one doing the initiation, yet emphasising on the need to protect himself.
all gers does tis in real life...pretty n sweet girls does it more. mus have all or nearly all cos if 1 sign can mean interested in sum1 else nt uuu.Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:How come in shows i always see those rather plump girls doing this?![]()
Then when the guy is taken away , she throws the girly temper.![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by Stoat:all gers does tis in real life...pretty n sweet girls does it more. mus have all or nearly all cos if 1 sign can mean interested in sum1 else nt uuu.
here is sum more...
she tok to u always lean forward so her face nearer to urs n look up at u.
when she lean forward in front of u she sum time 'forget' to cover her blouse.
if she noe u peek inside she became shy shy n dun look at u.
she start standing closer n closer to u...sum time her body 'accidently' rub againt u.
when u ask her sumting even if she is talking to sumone else she will ignore him n smile sweetly at u.
she always agree wif u.
when u go outing wif her...sum time she grab ur arm n press her bodie.![]()
![]()
![]()
Moon blocked by the sun (lunar eclipse) .Originally posted by qlqq9:OH, goodness, you people make relationship sound so complicated. I am seeing stars when I read the posts here. Stars, stars, but where is the moon?
Yes and no. Depends on two parties in the relationship and on one party only. Communication is so important and necessary, without which there is really practically nothing but guessing game.Originally posted by Scania N113CRB luver:Moon blocked by the sun (lunar eclipse) .
Actually relationships can be simple , its just how simple you want it to be.![]()
Looking at it analytically, we're effectively tackling the same issue from different angles, coming to pretty much the same conclusion, aren't we? While the extent of risk exposure is subjective, what you're advocating is exactly the same as mine. While you go on about protecting your heart to ensure you do not invest any more energy and time into an unworthy relationship, I'm merely advocating the importance of picking up the key signals (much of which were covered in my first post in this thread) to ascertain if the investment is worthwhile.Originally posted by curiousOrange:I do not advocate a game with no risk exposure, it would be insane to even think of achieving that.
I do not think it is a game.
Regarding your question of how a person can be doing the initiation, yet protect himself at the same time.
Risk sets in when you invest too much of your time and feelings too early.
Maybe in your book, initiation implies that a guy has to be her exclusive chauffer, spend sleepless nights thinking whether he should confess and send sweet messages to her.
I will be absolutely frank about it.
This “nice and gentle” guy who does all that is not me at all.
Neither is he you.
Aren’t you the one who advocate “letting nature takes its course”?
While the ends pretty much justify the means on this count, the protection of one's heart is pretty much a manifestation of one's inner self. Like I've said all along, we pretty much share a similar consensus with regard towards ascertaining what a woman should do before the bloke takes things further, it's the rationale governing the actions of the bloke's actions that differ for you and me.Originally posted by curiousOrange:My opinion is simple. Escalation of her interest does not involve investing your feelings heavily and lamenting to the whole world when she does not reciprocate.
It comes mainly from what you already have within.
It comes from what you have done to improve yourself and initiation is a display of value(confidence, humour, patience, interaction) to her.
If she is showing signs of interest, go for it.
If she is giving unrecognizable signals, pull back rather than invest more feelings (time and effort) into it.
Pulling back does not mean pulling the plug as you suggested.
You are still treating this person the same way. Just that if she really has high interest in you, she will have to come out from her shell and gives you the stronger signals you are waiting for if she wants a second date offer.
If she couldnÂ’t be arsed to do so or if she is some ultra passive and shy creature, you should really ask yourselfÂ…why do you bother?
Regardless, your heart is still protected.
While your logic ain't off the mark, I remain unconvinced this chap actually knows the girl well enough to judge her confidence level and how she prioritises things in her life (I've seen enough excess baggages in my time. By that, I mean birds who do actually have interest in a guy, but their overtly profound sense of insecurity and inferiority complex would dictate they can't neglect their long list of "friends" - where most are really just acquaintances who offer priceless companionship to kill loneliness and boredom instead of genuine friendships that will last a lifetime - even for someone who could potentially be a soulmate for a lifetime). Obviously, the fact that she hasn't actually gotten round to making a counter-offer in view of the two attempts she'd turned down could very much be down to the shyness/reservation which we'd mentioned earlier. Then again, you could be spot on as well. In essence, there're just too many uncertainties in this particular instance IMO to make any substantial conclusion that'd be remotely convincing beyond reasonable doubt.Originally posted by curiousOrange:In an ideal world, we can all rely heavily on our gut to tell us what to do and what to avoid.
Gut relates to your life experiences.
Would you tell a man who is 25 yrs old, has no experience in making an approach to rely on his gutÂ….and how nature would eventually take its course?
In this context,
Girl said she'd rather go to a birthday party.
There are no counter offers.
Girl couldnÂ’t be arsed to do anything after the incident, so he makes another offer.
My gut tells me this is not a sign of high interest.
His gut is probably telling him the same. He wouldnÂ’t be posting here if he has confidence that everything is rosy and sweet at this point.
So did he listen to his gut? Or is he trying to allow exceptions to set in so that he can invest even more?
Originally posted by walesa:let me surmarise.. u think he might be right, yet could be very wrong and u have no idea whats going on
While your logic ain't off the mark, I remain unconvinced this chap actually knows the girl well enough to judge her confidence level and how she prioritises things in her life (I've seen enough excess baggages in my time. By that, I mean birds who do actually have interest in a guy, but their overtly profound sense of insecurity and inferiority complex would dictate they can't neglect their long list of "friends" - where most are really just acquaintances who offer priceless companionship to kill loneliness and boredom [b]instead of genuine friendships that will last a lifetime - even for someone who could potentially be a soulmate for a lifetime). Obviously, the fact that she hasn't actually gotten round to making a counter-offer in view of the two attempts she'd turned down could very much be down to the shyness/reservation which we'd mentioned earlier. Then again, you could be spot on as well. In essence, there're just too many uncertainties in this particular instance IMO to make any substantial conclusion that'd be remotely convincing beyond reasonable doubt.
It is on that very premise that I can't make much of what's going on in this particular instance.[/b]

Huh! woei! me got a lovely bf ok, but let be realistic, bf used to buy flowers for me during eventful days like valentine, birthday etc etc... all very expensive, as a gf who love him, i told him to give me money instead of spending on flower, for flower, if he can pick it up in the garden or park will be more truly and enough for me. Those money collected shall be save in our joint account for future need.Originally posted by EarlNeo:Hmmm u look like one that had been hurt badly by guys in the past...![]()
As a suggestion, you could probably gauge her interest by asking her to suggest an alternate arrangement (ie.a day convenient for her) when she rejects you (regardless of reason). That way, you wouldn't need to worry about her lack of initiative conveying a lack of interest and you're, in all probability, going to get the answer you want. I mean, if despite prompting her to suggest an alternate arrangement, she doesn't respond or is non-committal, it pretty much says a lot, doesn't it?Originally posted by seaworld:hello all,
I am in the same situation as TS. I am the one always initiating the date. been out for more than 6 times alone..even smses i am the one initiating.
This goes on for abt 4 months. She is the busy sort that can only go out in during weekend.
but recently, 3 straights weeks was rejected for dates. Every reject will have a reason which i tink make sense to me.
Even thou was rejected, she will nev initiate alt date. I am at total loss now..carry on or move on....zzz
I simply ask her if she wanna go out on weekends for dinner or watever ..then on that day itself i would call and ask if wanted movie, shopping or..just dinner and window shopping...the last few dates usually ok, not much prob.a steady yes and i will make the arrangement (usually i make one).those 3 weeks like so busy for her..Originally posted by walesa:As a suggestion, you could probably gauge her interest by asking her to suggest an alternate arrangement (ie.a day convenient for her) when she rejects you (regardless of reason). That way, you wouldn't need to worry about her lack of initiative conveying a lack of interest and you're, in all probability, going to get the answer you want. I mean, if despite prompting her to suggest an alternate arrangement, she doesn't respond or is non-committal, it pretty much says a lot, doesn't it?
This method would let you know whether the 6 times you went out with her were mere outings or dates to her - personally, I don't think this method would work well for daniu82 as he has barely gone out with her. In your case, however, the response would pretty much give you the answer you want.
PS : On a sidenote, how exactly do you ask her out for dates? What's the exact line you'd pop? Note that the way of asking could mean a great deal between it being a date and just an outing.
So, to quell your doubts, why don't you just ask her to propose another date where she'll be free the next time she turns you down when you initiate a date? From there, you can pretty much gauge things...Originally posted by seaworld:I simply ask her if she wanna go out on weekends for dinner or watever ..then on that day itself i would call and ask if wanted movie, shopping or..just dinner and window shopping...the last few dates usually ok, not much prob.a steady yes and i will make the arrangement (usually i make one).those 3 weeks like so busy for her..
but nev once she initiated anything b4..zzz...date or outing i dun know..but once i knew she went out with her friends in the morning and later rush to meet me for dinner,...
and she ever send me a BD card, the card with small hearts and love shape on it..would any ger send friend BD card with heart/love shape?
seems like her actions telling the otherway round...zzz
good luck bro...all the best....Originally posted by daniu82:Hi seaworld, any improvement between you and her?? I am going to out with her today for the 1st official date..... Hope to improve my r/s with her....