I have dounts on my wierd school rules..its bothering me
-
just do what i do.rebel.i mean against the school.Originally posted by shade343:But the school has been overzealous in doing it. They actually send teachers to patrol shopping centres like Tampines Mall and century square. And the teachers are equipped with handphone cameras to snap pictures of you--so you cant deny that you did not loiter. Yes. Originally the rationale behind this rule is to prevent students from tarnishing the school's good image and prevent them from not going home. But they have gone overbroad when they started punishing students for buying curry puffs at the mini-mart. How fair is that? And it is also against the school's rule to bring a T shirt to school or wear a T shirt underneath your school uniform.
We Have to GO HOME and Change into our home clothes before going out.
screw the rules.
promises aren't meant to be broken.
rules are.
screw the rules, they're getting out of hand...
-
in me old sch, the whole prefactorial board and peer leader council used to have one major pedition of abt 800+ students name plus 200plus parents name then to make my sch change the no Handphone rule, our principal see abt 100plus students crowding outside his office, wah, was shock, went into canteen and started a discussion that lasted abt 4min before submitting due to the fact that it was quite presurising, maybe you and your frens can try that too, just exclude your parents
-
write to Straits Time
-
LOL .. wat sch is this .. can u pm me ? haha i live in the east too .. was from temasek sec .. nothing outrageous rules from them during my time ..
-
what kind of weird rules is this?
-
This is a rule with no loopholes. The ultimate of all ultimates.Originally posted by rongshao85:what kind of weird rules is this? -
i should say that this are the stupiest rules i have ever seen.
-
That is just lame, go ahead and write to The New Paper, and blast the school to hell. I support ya, this is insane.Originally posted by shade343:But the school has been overzealous in doing it. They actually send teachers to patrol shopping centres like Tampines Mall and century square. And the teachers are equipped with handphone cameras to snap pictures of you--so you cant deny that you did not loiter. Yes. Originally the rationale behind this rule is to prevent students from tarnishing the school's good image and prevent them from not going home. But they have gone overbroad when they started punishing students for buying curry puffs at the mini-mart. How fair is that? And it is also against the school's rule to bring a T shirt to school or wear a T shirt underneath your school uniform.
We Have to GO HOME and Change into our home clothes before going out. -
Yup, its so stupid, you even found a non-existent term to describe it.Originally posted by rongshao85:i should say that this are the stupiest rules i have ever seen. -
Could you explain why this rule is stupid? I mean you cant just tell the principal that we should change the rules because "It is stupid" or "I dont like it". We have to elaborate further.Originally posted by rongshao85:i should say that this are the stupiest rules i have ever seen. -
Sorry for double postOriginally posted by snk86:in me old sch, the whole prefactorial board and peer leader council used to have one major pedition of abt 800+ students name plus 200plus parents name then to make my sch change the no Handphone rule, our principal see abt 100plus students crowding outside his office, wah, was shock, went into canteen and started a discussion that lasted abt 4min before submitting due to the fact that it was quite presurising, maybe you and your frens can try that too, just exclude your parents
Is it legal to do that? Wont it be "causing disturbance" or something funny?
But I think this rule is a classic example on how the Principals and the Disciplinary Comittee thinks about the students in the school. After all, school rules does reflects on the way the teachers and principals thinks of its students. -
Hey shade you sound like ur from my school
my ex-sec school used to have such draconian rules
and there's a minimart near ur sch..same as mine..
and there's also a shopping center and nearby blocks nearby
so i suspect we both from same sch..
regarding the sending of teachers nearby..(to spy on u all
there's 1 male teacher there whom i have a BIG grudge with , last time
make me suffer damn jialat..
If we are both of the same school , i will help u settle it using unlawful manner
no ligation , no mitigation , no whatever shlt .
Im going to grab him by the collar and take him to police station and say he instruding privacy by taking photos..
Anyway if i see him again , im gonna **** the hell outta him..
pm me ur school name PLEASE!! -
lol.. thanks.. i love to create words.. u know, gah-men are encourging us to be creative and innovativeOriginally posted by ditzy:Yup, its so stupid, you even found a non-existent term to describe it. -
well, i find it stupid because the school actually restrict a person from going somewhere which is outside the school compound. it's like u can only go to school and home everyday and it seems like the school is controlling yr life. anyway, i suggest you compile all the suggestions given by everyone and reason out with your principal. who knows, u might just be the one who can convince her or him.Originally posted by shade343:Could you explain why this rule is stupid? I mean you cant just tell the principal that we should change the rules because "It is stupid" or "I dont like it". We have to elaborate further. -
Loitering can understand lah...mayb sch dun wan u al join gangsters mah,,thats their point of view...which indirectly gv ur school bad name...Originally posted by shade343:My school has this wierd rule. Loitering-- Students would not be allowed to visit shopping centres or sit under void decks in their school uniforms. PUNISHMENT: Detention; CWO for repeat offenders. Recently, the definition of loitering has been extended to include, no visiting a minimart under the void deck or eating at the food court of a shopping centre. However, visiting the library in a shopping centre is allowed for 20 minutes only.It would seem that my school is the only school in Singapore that considers a visit to the mini mart an offence. The rationale given here is that food is available in school and thus, there is no need for you to buy food from outside.
I need to ask, is this rule against my rights of freedom of movement? Also I wonder which other schools have this rule?
EDIT: title should read Doubts instead of dounts
No visiting of minimart is rediculars..!!!!!!!!Y lea..buy thing there got wrong mea??? or cannot be in sch uniform or cannot during recess time??
But.......visiting library can only 20 mins, very weired...how to find books in 20 mins??????
If i were you, i 100% go minimart buy things...if kanna catch den tel them reasons lor..."Say, Goverment gv $$ to built sch to educate ppl, but serve students wid tat type of food"how can???? but seriously...i dunno how jia lat is the food..got more worst den the Army??but few yrs back, when serving NS, food still not bad lea... -
I think yr sch. is not the only one with this rule. I guess it is ok to buy snacks from minimart or eat in foodct. in sch. uniform but should not loiter. I've noticed some guys chatting up the girls & they use the minimart as meeting place. Public can identify u from yr uniform so yr behaviour outside sch. is very impt.
-
if u are the same sch as me..i will surely help u out..
coz i still keeping the uniform safely with me..=/ not sure if i can wear bo
i disguise as 1 of the student den go scold the teacher..
Teachers very smart..but im even smarter..
then they pull me to discipline office..
then ask me..which class and register number you from..
i say this class and this no..
den saboh that guy u dun like oso =D -
If you really find it so intolerable, then call the press.... Any organisation be it small or big are afraid of the reputation that it may suffer from and that includes schools.
-
I am sure that the school has a valid concern for wanting to protect its reputation; after all, how would parents think of the school if their students were to be walking everywhere in public places instead of being kept in school or at home? It is this public perception that students left outside would engage in nefarious activities that leads the conservative elements pressurise the schools to do more to "keep our young off the streets for their own good".
However, what your school has chosen to do has gone too far: restricting one's movement outside is akin to treating the student like a prisoner on home detention: he isn't free to move about as a normal human being.
What the school could have encouraged was to allow the students to change to civilian clothes, and go do what they want to do. After all, the school should have no right to interfere with the student's live after official school time. In fact, whenever I went out with my school mates after school, we made sure to change at least our shirts. That way, we could avoid any awkward encounters with any of the teachers we met along the way, and also gives us leeway to get ouselves out of trouble in case we happened to get into some incident. Not that we would deliberately do so anyway! -
Suddenly had some thoughts.. Is your school really that 'bad' to have such rules implemented...? Or is there something really wrong with your principal..? A new system for all schools..??
-
My school lack lack de... book write like so strict like that, infact nobody cares... My secondary school also like that but my Primary school strict lah.
-
My primary school once passed down a sudden rule
that nobody will visit this shop at the MRT near our school
they even had prefects standing outside the shop to book ppl
lolx...
tat realli pissed the owner off
-
Rules are meant to be broken!
-
The example of your teacher snapping students with the camera phone can be classified as an offence with might break many rules if you can prove that he is taking photos of a certain group of persons , i.e your fellow students.What I propose is that if your picture is taken, go down to the police station and clarify with them on this issue.The school has no place dictating how its students should behave outside school and there is certainly no law in our Penal Code that prohibits you from wearing your school uniform in a public domain.
-
The cops will probably try to get em to ren and get over with it, if worse, think they r troublemakers. IMO lar.Originally posted by LazerLordz:The example of your teacher snapping students with the camera phone can be classified as an offence with might break many rules if you can prove that he is taking photos of a certain group of persons , i.e your fellow students.What I propose is that if your picture is taken, go down to the police station and clarify with them on this issue.The school has no place dictating how its students should behave outside school and there is certainly no law in our Penal Code that prohibits you from wearing your school uniform in a public domain.