Feel like F**king small girls......
-
Don't feed the troll kthanks! -
wat kind of person will pick gals that are so young...
kind of sick u know...
older 1 nvm...12+...
SICK... -
must keep a look out for recent newspaper liao
-
i guess then fa lun gong is buddhist and Unification Church is Xtian too.Originally posted by banzie:Maybe your google search only display ONE results.... so unfortunately happened to be their website. My advise is READ ON. Maybe you should start reading the website of First Church of satan. It is not really the traditional church of satan. I think it talks abit about the history of the cult and how they decided to build this church and how it differs to other satanic cult... There are nothing more than a bunch of idiots with some new age thinking with a mixed of satanism + people who doesn't really believe in anything. I'm surprised how limited your knowledge has being. Try searching try reading will you. First church of satan has barely a history of a decade and bit more only. It doesn't reflect the true satanic cult in anyway. There are more than what you think of out there. There is infact a larger more systematic satanic cult around running in underground covets. I really felt totally wasting my time doing all these explaination.
hey if it doesn't need to be recognised as a religion then whats the point? I ought to start my own christian breakaway faction.
however much crap u can say, u still can't say its part of official, recognised, satanism. And i love the way u assume my knowledge is limited. I wonder why u can only talk about underground satanism and conveniently forget about the true purpose of satanism, and its real roots in other religions which still exist today, instead of in being part of a long existing satanic religion.
in any case, i only recognise Anton LaVey's chuch and rules. the rest of the fringe cultists, are just that.
u feel like u're wasting your time? everytime i have to talk to a pervert like u, i AM wasting my time. -
OOohhhh now you mean the satanism you are talking about is different one eh? Hmm.... Its really interesting how you debate... from one to another.... so now its different...Originally posted by HENG@:i guess then fa lun gong is buddhist and Unification Church is Xtian too.
hey if it doesn't need to be recognised as a religion then whats the point? I ought to start my own christian breakaway faction.
however much crap u can say, u still can't say its part of official, recognised, satanism. And i love the way u assume my knowledge is limited. I wonder why u can only talk about underground satanism and conveniently forget about the true purpose of satanism, and its real roots in other religions which still exist today, instead of in being part of a long existing satanic religion.
in any case, i only recognise Anton LaVey's chuch and rules. the rest of the fringe cultists, are just that.
u feel like u're wasting your time? everytime i have to talk to a pervert like u, i AM wasting my time.
Same analogy as I said lime are sour and you telling me that your lime and mine is different now.... I tot we are talking about Lime baby?
And what do you think the true purpose of satanism? You mean to tell me its bringing salvation to the world? Sorry back on the queue someone is already on it and His name is Jesus. Well What then is the true purpose of satanism? Anyway it still undeniable that the cases of Child ritual abuse are still present solidly/. -
u CB-kia!wats wrong with you?
Pick on someone your own age u lao tee koh! -
You very CB lehs! PICK on SOMEONE your OWN AGE!!!!
CLose this thread!!!everybody please SPAM to close this thread! -
nope. its always been the same one. Anton LaVey's Satanism. Maybe u just couldn't catch onto that right from the start. The rule number 9 i quoted right from the start was written by him. So, it was never different. U seem to have problems understanding, and then u want to put words into my mouth and say i've been saying different things?Originally posted by banzie:OOohhhh now you mean the satanism you are talking about is different one eh? Hmm.... Its really interesting how you debate... from one to another.... so now its different...
Same analogy as I said lime are sour and you telling me that your lime and mine is different now.... I tot we are talking about Lime baby?
And what do you think the true purpose of satanism? You mean to tell me its bringing salvation to the world? Sorry back on the queue someone is already on it and His name is Jesus. Well What then is the true purpose of satanism? Anyway it still undeniable that the cases of Child ritual abuse are still present solidly/.
your analogy is wrong as hell. its like I been talking about limes and u're talking about oranges and then u realise u've been talking about oranges and is now trying to tell me since oragnes and limes are the same family, u should be allowed to present oranges as lime.
and Satanism was never intended to bring salvation. Only enlightenment. Perhaps u might be xtian and disagree, but in my opinion, Xtianity is mankind's cheap way of absolving themselves of any responsibility for their evils. Satanism's sole purpose is the enlightenment that each person is responsible for themselves. They have never advocated ritualistic child abuse.
And I also do not deny there are ritualistic child abuses occuring, but these are by fringe cultists who do not grasp the true basis of satanism and blame satan for their own human evils and desires. -
i got lobang...
Come to this place called police station. There are a lot of people who are in navy blue uniform to help you satisfy your needs
-
u pervertic son of a b!tch!! get a life man.!
-
This is so great... remember the basis of our debate here? Indeed your view is limited... which shows as much as your knowledge... Your ideal of satanism only seems to limit to a little organisation set up in barely a little more than a decade and you called that the mainstream? Time to jump out of the well little frog... You'll see the real world... Do some research PPPPppppllleleaeeaaaaasssee before you keep getting sacastic remarks from me. The First church of satan is just a TINY small proportion of the many satanic cultist who are more mainstream and even longer history (You know why they never appear so blatantly unlike the above? because they are Illegal get it!?).... Its right they say never debate with a woman.... They will always appear irrational...How true but then again you really doesn't reflect every girls..Originally posted by HENG@:
nope. its always been the same one. Anton LaVey's Satanism. Maybe u just couldn't catch onto that right from the start. The rule number 9 i quoted right from the start was written by him. So, it was never different. U seem to have problems understanding, and then u want to put words into my mouth and say i've been saying different things?
your analogy is wrong as hell. its like I been talking about limes and u're talking about oranges and then u realise u've been talking about oranges and is now trying to tell me since oragnes and limes are the same family, u should be allowed to present oranges as lime.
and Satanism was never intended to bring salvation. Only enlightenment. Perhaps u might be xtian and disagree, but in my opinion, Xtianity is mankind's cheap way of absolving themselves of any responsibility for their evils. Satanism's sole purpose is the enlightenment that each person is responsible for themselves. They have never advocated ritualistic child abuse.And I also do not deny there are ritualistic child abuses occuring, but these are by fringe cultists who do not grasp the true basis of satanism and blame satan for their own human evils and desires.
You have such limited view of something as to only a website.... I'm truly disappointed at the quality of the opponent I'm debating with... It seems you're never able to produce any quality evidence to your facts just as before... Please do not waste my time if you can't play the game within the rules. -
do tell me why i should have to consider paganistic cults as satanism. I consider them pagan, not satanic.Originally posted by banzie:This is so great... remember the basis of our debate here? Indeed your view is limited... which shows as much as your knowledge... Your ideal of satanism only seems to limit to a little organisation set up in barely a little more than a decade and you called that the mainstream? Time to jump out of the well little frog... You'll see the real world... Do some research PPPPppppllleleaeeaaaaasssee before you keep getting sacastic remarks from me. The First church of satan is just a TINY small proportion of the many satanic cultist who are more mainstream and even longer history (You know why they never appear so blatantly unlike the above? because they are Illegal get it!?).... Its right they say never debate with a woman.... They will always appear irrational...How true but then again you really doesn't reflect every girls..
You have such limited view of something as to only a website.... I'm truly disappointed at the quality of the opponent I'm debating with... It seems you're never able to produce any quality evidence to your facts just as before... Please do not waste my time if you can't play the game within the rules.
my research is pretty solid. just because i do not consider paganisic cults as satanic does not mean i am not aware of them or of their rituals.
however, YOUR inability to understand that just because i do not consider something satanic from my POV does not mean i am not ignorant is very typically male short sightedness. No wonder arguing with men are like arguing with retards, they are so solidly stuck within their own bubble and can't see any other POV besides their own. Seems like men are not only irrational, they're also obstinately narrow-minded.
Oh well, no wonder my opponent is disappointed. I suppose the only thing that never fails to disappoint him is ladies stripping in front of him. Someone who doesn't even know the rules of the game shouldn't be talking about playing within the rules. Afterall, how within the rules can u be, if u're stupidly blabbing about no evidence even as you yourself remain blind to whatevr your opponent is saying? Just because your own short-sightedness blinds u to evidence, don't blame your blindness on others. Also, one wonders WHAT sort of "quality evidence" you have produced at all. Evidence like Fiona Xie upskirts? Or the likes thereof?
Maybe u should just stick to your pervert posts since u seem to get off on them so much. Don't bother trying to speak sense. It's obvious your own stupidity results in you wasting your own time whenever u try to indulge in any intelligent debate. -
eh PM for wat?
-
I just bumped this thread.
Morning Heng.
-
Hsa the TS been banned yet?
-
It sounds better in Hokkien....Originally posted by Master -_-:eh PM for wat?
*ahem *
PM GUM LAN!
-
ar!
12++ above is o.k.. say 14 or 16 .. but below ! THATS SICK !! U ... SICK! -
nabei...call the police
-
Cum cum I bring u go find them , veri near only , go Lim Chu Kang only .... 0=) your size might be too much of a size for them!!!
-
Oh sooo now you are accusing me of changing the topic to pagaistic cult....!!??? Not I mean Satanic Cult that worship SATAN!!! Wake up! Wake Up none of my threads talk about Paganistic Cult my little girl please do not side track again. Please stick to the core topics. Finally As far as I remember I had very few threads that is debatable.... I'm surprised threads like Fiona Upskirt can be seen as an challage to your intelligence... I shall give to you and let you win.... Frankly my debating talents has better uses haha...Originally posted by HENG@:do tell me why i should have to consider paganistic cults as satanism. I consider them pagan, not satanic.
my research is pretty solid. just because i do not consider paganisic cults as satanic does not mean i am not aware of them or of their rituals.
however, YOUR inability to understand that just because i do not consider something satanic from my POV does not mean i am not ignorant is very typically male short sightedness. No wonder arguing with men are like arguing with retards, they are so solidly stuck within their own bubble and can't see any other POV besides their own. Seems like men are not only irrational, they're also obstinately narrow-minded.
Oh well, no wonder my opponent is disappointed. I suppose the only thing that never fails to disappoint him is ladies stripping in front of him. Someone who doesn't even know the rules of the game shouldn't be talking about playing within the rules. Afterall, how within the rules can u be, if u're stupidly blabbing about no evidence even as you yourself remain blind to whatevr your opponent is saying? Just because your own short-sightedness blinds u to evidence, don't blame your blindness on others. Also, one wonders WHAT sort of "quality evidence" you have produced at all. Evidence like Fiona Xie upskirts? Or the likes thereof?
Maybe u should just stick to your pervert posts since u seem to get off on them so much. Don't bother trying to speak sense. It's obvious your own stupidity results in you wasting your own time whenever u try to indulge in any intelligent debate. -
LCK cemetry got alien meh ?Originally posted by NemesisAlien:Cum cum I bring u go find them , veri near only , go Lim Chu Kang only .... 0=) your size might be too much of a size for them!!! -
they will make him happy....Originally posted by striderz_o405:i got lobang...
Come to this place called police station. There are a lot of people who are in navy blue uniform to help you satisfy your needs -
somemore got handcuff, baton, everything.Originally posted by striderz_o405:i got lobang...
Come to this place called police station. There are a lot of people who are in navy blue uniform to help you satisfy your needs -
-
He can live his fantasy..Originally posted by Gordonator:somemore got handcuff, baton, everything.