Feel like F**king small girls......
-
save it, perv.Originally posted by banzie:Oh sooo now you are accusing me of changing the topic to pagaistic cult....!!??? Not I mean Satanic Cult that worship SATAN!!! Wake up! Wake Up none of my threads talk about Paganistic Cult my little girl please do not side track again. Please stick to the core topics. Finally As far as I remember I had very few threads that is debatable.... I'm surprised threads like Fiona Upskirt can be seen as an challage to your intelligence... I shall give to you and let you win.... Frankly my debating talents has better uses haha...
-
shows how little u know about Satanism.Originally posted by banzie:Oh sooo now you are accusing me of changing the topic to pagaistic cult....!!??? Not I mean Satanic Cult that worship SATAN!!! Wake up! Wake Up none of my threads talk about Paganistic Cult my little girl please do not side track again. Please stick to the core topics. Finally As far as I remember I had very few threads that is debatable.... I'm surprised threads like Fiona Upskirt can be seen as an challage to your intelligence... I shall give to you and let you win.... Frankly my debating talents has better uses haha...
where do u think the Avatar for Satan came from? Pagan culture and lore.
"nuff. stop showing your ignorance here. Maybe u're one of those Satanist who blindly worship "satan" without even knowing what the hell u're worshipping.
i never said threads like fiona xie upskirt are a challenge to my intelligence. however they're clear evidence that u're a Bar pervert. No wonder u've just gotten all blusterly and flustered. -
Originally posted by trendz:save it, perv.
seems like quite a few others think u're a perv too banzie. oh i suppose u're gonna launch into a "banzie is clever, everyone who thinks banzie is a perv is stupid" sort of tantrum -
U all want to quarrel like girls or wanna talk about f*cking small girls? -
fu_ck off and die pervertOriginally posted by strong_n_long:U all want to quarrel like girls or wanna talk about f*cking small girls? -
aren't u already doing dat? -
sicko
-
dun sprain your brain. i can see u're trying very hard to make an intelligent insultOriginally posted by strong_n_long:aren't u already doing dat?
how come perverts are so shameless one -
2 gay dogs fvcking among themselves!
wat a joke! wat a bunch of retards!
-
Hmmm have you read thru the number of negative remarks on you? I'm luff now at you.Originally posted by HENG@:
seems like quite a few others think u're a perv too banzie. oh i suppose u're gonna launch into a "banzie is clever, everyone who thinks banzie is a perv is stupid" sort of tantrum -
where do u think the Avatar for Satan came from? Pagan culture and lore.Originally posted by HENG@:shows how little u know about Satanism.
where do u think the Avatar for Satan came from? Pagan culture and lore.
"nuff. stop showing your ignorance here. Maybe u're one of those Satanist who blindly worship "satan" without even knowing what the hell u're worshipping.
i never said threads like fiona xie upskirt are a challenge to my intelligence. however they're clear evidence that u're a Bar pervert. No wonder u've just gotten all blusterly and flustered.
Hmmm I think you are the ignorant one... Your above statement is already wrong.... Please read about the history thank you You are really making a fool of yourself.
Lastly what you want to say about me as perv or what I really wasn't even concern... That is really the fact... sorry to disappoint you... how my character is I am very certain I'm clear as a glass. Just as the readers of my thread. -
For your little puny little mind I shall give a little hint the symbol of Satanism has to do with the star of david... sorry not pagan or lore.. I really find our debate insulting to my intelligence...
-
you really good at arguing siaOriginally posted by HENG@:dun sprain your brain. i can see u're trying very hard to make an intelligent insult
how come perverts are so shameless one
if i am to argue, i rather admit defeat.
-
What's the point of quarreling? Man is sinful. There will always be criminals, and this will distinct between good and bad people.
Have you read the news? There are cannibals, paedophiles, tranvestites, drug abusers, murders and other kind of extreme crimes. So many things in society are already degenerated.
The typical brains of criminals such as rapists, and cannibals are underdeveloped in the frontal cortex, and their EQ is extremely low as discovered in scientific studies. Their thoughts are liken animals rather than responsible adult human. Criminals can't mix well in the society because they don't have the benevolent factors of being a good person. -
i've only seen the losers, the bigots and the people who are just plain ignorant and narrow minded make negative remarks about me, so honestly i couldn't care less.Originally posted by banzie:Hmmm have you read thru the number of negative remarks on you? I'm luff now at you.
I would rather not be friends with people like that anyway. I have more than enough good regular people who like me. I have yet to see anyone speak up and say they like u -
insulting to your intelligence if u had any.Originally posted by banzie:For your little puny little mind I shall give a little hint the symbol of Satanism has to do with the star of david... sorry not pagan or lore.. I really find our debate insulting to my intelligence...
for your puny little mind, i shall hint that the avatar im talking about, is not any star or pentagram, but rather, the perceived "look" of Satan, aka the goat head.
then again seeing as u lack any intelligence, its no wonder u simply have no idea at all. dun try to jump higher than u can jump, its bad for whatever tiny mush u call a brain -
Oh you mean the goat... please check out what does goat means... BTW it is all about the opposite of Christianity. The right symbol I'm so sorry is the encircled star of david not the dumb goat which medival painting reflected... It is only added later...btw.. Also do read about the custom of Satanism... it does include sacrifices which involve blood... I'm basically luffing at you at things you type out... BTW are you checking the right history book? DO you need me to recomend afew to your so intelligent mind?> TO all the people reading this... Please let's just ignore this attention seeker called Heng... She seems to keep giving alot of false information... I asked that all who are interested in this satanism thing to read online for more... that why you'll know who is right and who is ignorant not as "SHE" would claim...Originally posted by HENG@:insulting to your intelligence if u had any.
for your puny little mind, i shall hint that the avatar im talking about, is not any star or pentagram, but rather, the perceived "look" of Satan, aka the goat head.
then again seeing as u lack any intelligence, its no wonder u simply have no idea at all. dun try to jump higher than u can jump, its bad for whatever tiny mush u call a brain She is just arguing for the sake of arguing with not prove... simply PROVE ME WRONG in documents and books.
Here I present mine!!! and your goat head btw ...
http://exposingsatanism.org/signsymbols.htm -
I'm not proving who is more popular but replying to your previous post... in contrast your words are luffable... stop shaming yourself ok? ACTION speak louder than words..Originally posted by HENG@:i've only seen the losers, the bigots and the people who are just plain ignorant and narrow minded make negative remarks about me, so honestly i couldn't care less.
I would rather not be friends with people like that anyway. I have more than enough good regular people who like me. I have yet to see anyone speak up and say they like u -
dont quarrel lah.
-
yawn yawn whistle. so only your website is right and others are wrong.Originally posted by banzie:Oh you mean the goat... please check out what does goat means... BTW it is all about the opposite of Christianity. The right symbol I'm so sorry is the encircled star of david not the dumb goat which medival painting reflected... It is only added later...btw.. Also do read about the custom of Satanism... it does include sacrifices which involve blood... I'm basically luffing at you at things you type out... BTW are you checking the right history book? DO you need me to recomend afew to your so intelligent mind?> TO all the people reading this... Please let's just ignore this attention seeker called Heng... She seems to keep giving alot of false information... I asked that all who are interested in this satanism thing to read online for more... that why you'll know who is right and who is ignorant not as "SHE" would claim... She is just arguing for the sake of arguing with not prove... simply PROVE ME WRONG in documents and books.
Here I present mine!!! and your goat head btw ...
http://exposingsatanism.org/signsymbols.htm
whoooo ok. im starting my own branch of religion and insisting mine is right then.
I'm sorry but like I said before, I consider Anton's Satanic Bible the official Satanic guide. u dun agree doesn't mean im misleading people. Fa lun gong also claim they are buddhist leh. So what? They can also provide their websites and books but it's not Buddhism because it's NOT RECOGNISED THUS. Same logic. so simple but u seem to have problems understanding it.
Perhaps u dun understand the difference in meaning of "avatar of Satan", and "symbol of Satanism".
im talking about apples why u come n talk oranges?
wonder who's the attention seeker too. yea i start bo liao threads like "fiona xie upskirt" because i am attention seeking. -
everytime u call me attention seeker, u're shaming yrself. i looked and looked and i couldn't find any attention seeking threads about upskirts or pantyhoses or the likes started by me lehOriginally posted by banzie:I'm not proving who is more popular but replying to your previous post... in contrast your words are luffable... stop shaming yourself ok? ACTION speak louder than words..
and so far i dun see anyone telling me to "save it pervert"
boy u must be really thick skinned, to be a NATO and tell me "actions(lousy english somemore ) speak louder than words" dun u realise the irony? -
Heng..... I am sooooo sorry if I had again and again made you appears to be less intelligent than you are.... using WEBSITES... INFORMATION and URLs in many numerous times... I really need to apologies because it seems that I am using a rather unfair means to do so... I seems to be the ONLY one using URLs to prove my statement right and hence making you look ugly in a more disadvantagous way ALLLLLL TTTHHHEEESSSEEE WHILE. It is indeed my oversensitivity to percieved that people actually belived in facts and not heresay... In anyway if you wish to I had offended you I apologies.. I therefore would look forward to a more fair ground in our debates hoping to see the facts that so support the way you percieved things... if not I would in future choose selectively in responsing to your thread... Hoping you would not mistook me for being discourteous but rather I find it you had overlooked and had asked a totally stupid and unintelligent question as as you had claimed you are very intelligent. And I would wish to believe that. We are all mature people I believed and I do debate with logic and not emotionally. That is the act of childish kid arguing
-
oh im sorry. i'd have thot any idiot doing a search for "satanic commandments" would be able to find heaps of URLs for it. since u're an extraordinary idiot, i'll give u the URLs then:Originally posted by banzie:Heng..... I am sooooo sorry if I had again and again made you appears to be less intelligent than you are.... using WEBSITES... INFORMATION and URLs in many numerous times... I really need to apologies because it seems that I am using a rather unfair means to do so... I seems to be the ONLY one using URLs to prove my statement right and hence making you look ugly in a more disadvantagous way ALLLLLL TTTHHHEEESSSEEE WHILE. It is indeed my oversensitivity to percieved that people actually belived in facts and not heresay... In anyway if you wish to I had offended you I apologies.. I therefore would look forward to a more fair ground in our debates hoping to see the facts that so support the way you percieved things... if not I would in future choose selectively in responsing to your thread... Hoping you would not mistook me for being discourteous but rather I find it you had overlooked and had asked a totally stupid and unintelligent question as as you had claimed you are very intelligent. And I would wish to believe that. We are all mature people I believed and I do debate with logic and not emotionally. That is the act of childish kid arguing
http://www.churchofsatan.com/home.html
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=380786
from wiki:
He further outlined 11 Satanic rules, which while not exactly a moral code, provide Satanists with general guidelines for living:
Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked.
Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them.
When in anotherÂ’s lair, show him respect or else do not go there.
If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy.
Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal.
Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved.
Acknowledge the power of magic if you have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained.
Do not complain about anything to which you need not subject yourself.
Do not harm little children.
Do not kill non-human animals unless you are attacked or for your food.
When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.
talked about here in comparism to the Quran:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/4229/church-of-satan.html
http://www.satan4u.8m.com/religion/guidetoliving.html
u want more? -
I guess you didn't really read my previous posts.... For your limited knowlegde I shall for the last time say this... Your so called first church of satan is just a new cult that appear in slightly a decade more that's all... Just by a single organisation you are listing it as what the norms of satanism is you are pretty misleading....Originally posted by HENG@:oh im sorry. i'd have thot any idiot doing a search for "satanic commandments" would be able to find heaps of URLs for it. since u're an extraordinary idiot, i'll give u the URLs then:
http://www.churchofsatan.com/home.html
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=380786
from wiki:
He further outlined 11 Satanic rules, which while not exactly a moral code, provide Satanists with general guidelines for living:
Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked.
Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them.
When in anotherÂ’s lair, show him respect or else do not go there.
If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy.
Do not make sexual advances unless you are given the mating signal.
Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved.
Acknowledge the power of magic if you have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained.
Do not complain about anything to which you need not subject yourself.
Do not harm little children.
Do not kill non-human animals unless you are attacked or for your food.
When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.
talked about here in comparism to the Quran:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/4229/church-of-satan.html
http://www.satan4u.8m.com/religion/guidetoliving.html
u want more?
Secondly If you are talking about deviant sects of a religion... like falungon and buddhism... It is clearly, First Church of Satan IS the Falungon or satanism not the mainstream satanism... occult satanism had a very long history event in SG it does have a underground group of satanism cult appear long before 1994. even if it is a part of the mainstream which in this case it can only present as a small part of the mainstream.... it doesn't represent the majority or satanism as a whole... Same thing as Christianity has many denomination, with each having their own arrays of values... yet all had the same core beliefs and classified as satanism... No one single values can generalised the mainstream ideal...
No matter the case I think in this debate you had lost and started debating in the wrong ground... A portion of satanism doesn't do child abuse doesn't mean ALL Mainstream Satanism doesn't do CHild abuse...in fact experts believed there are more than what satistically had shown. Isn't our debate about existance of Child abuse in Satanism?
Read about the history of satanism...
http://www.satanic-kindred.org/history.htm
Anton Szandor LaVey Movement is nothing but a new age idealism.... Satanism my foot. -
with regards to who is the deviant sect of a religion, simply go check which is the officially recognised religion. If it's only a deviant cult I wonder why it's been choosen to be officially recognised as the Satanic religion.Originally posted by banzie:I guess you didn't really read my previous posts.... For your limited knowlegde I shall for the last time say this... Your so called first church of satan is just a new cult that appear in slightly a decade more that's all... Just by a single organisation you are listing it as what the norms of satanism is you are pretty misleading....
Secondly If you are talking about deviant sects of a religion... like falungon and buddhism... It is clearly, First Church of Satan IS the Falungon or satanism not the mainstream satanism... occult satanism had a very long history event in SG it does have a underground group of satanism cult appear long before 1994. even if it is a part of the mainstream which in this case it can only present as a small part of the mainstream.... it doesn't represent the majority or satanism as a whole... Same thing as Christianity has many denomination, with each having their own arrays of values... yet all had the same core beliefs and classified as satanism... No one single values can generalised the mainstream ideal...
No matter the case I think in this debate you had lost and started debating in the wrong ground... A portion of satanism doesn't do child abuse doesn't mean ALL Mainstream Satanism doesn't do CHild abuse... Isn't our debate about existance of Child abuse in Satanism?
I had no idea who won the debate depends on what u think. Because I think u lost when u decided to bring up non-officially recognised deviant cult satanism and called it the real official satanism. Very typical guy, no wonder u guys refuse to accept it when u're lost n swallow your pride to ask for directions.