About all the lame posting in BAR.
-
You're crazy.Originally posted by parn:Okie...it's good to know that you have realised your mistakes, so don't try stunts like this anymore. Relax lah.....
-
Hey parn, stop being so personal just because I quoted you ok? People never come provoke you don't understand why you must be such a jerk also.
And as usual, you misread my posts and twists my words. -
Hmm....I would like to know why you choose to challenge me to give my opinions about the underage girls sex topic. Do you know me personally?Originally posted by SumOne:Just wondering parn, why are you being so personal against me?
Think you need to watch your words when you post with reference to other people's quotes. Don't remember? Go back to that thread and have a look by yourself.
Do you know how sick it is to encourage people to participate in this kind of topic? I'm sure people like you do not have enough morals to resist your own temptations against such acts on an underage gal. Think of how other people will feel and how it is going to affect them if such topics is allowed to be discussed freely like you wanted.
Do you like your future little girl to suffer this kind of mishap first before you can realised the 'seed' that you are sowing in other people's mind? Do you want to be responsible for the moral behaviour of the next generation if any of those future sickos read those threads about how to rape, how to have sex with underage gals.
Do not think of fulfilling your own selfish sicko desires at the expense of fuelling other people's mind with the right to rape or have sex with underage gals.
Consider about the consequences and the after effects first before you try to exert your own rights to have a proper discussion. Like I have mentioned, certain topics are taboo to me. So leave me out of your sick ambitions.
-
As I keep saying, you are always mis-reading and misinterpreting my posts. And maybe you yourself should go back to the thread and see my replies. I have told you that I myself am against child sex as well. So such a thread could be used to voice out against such acts. But however, you were more carried away by me quoting you than anything, which is why I have said, that you are more interested to start a flame war than anything. So far you have done nothing but carry out personal attacks on me.Originally posted by parn:Hmm....I would like to know why you choose to challenge me to give my opinions about the underage girls sex topic. Do you know me personally?
Think you need to watch your words when you post with reference to other people's quotes. Don't remember? Go back to that thread and have a look by yourself.
Do you know how sick it is to encourage people to participate in this kind of topic? I'm sure people like you do not have enough morals to resist your own temptations against such acts on an underage gal. Think of how other people will feel and how it is going to affect them if such topics is allowed to be discussed freely like you wanted.
Do you like your future little girl to suffer this kind of mishap first before you can realised the 'seed' that you are sowing in other people's mind? Do you want to be responsible for the moral behaviour of the next generation if any of those future sickos read those threads about how to rape, how to have sex with underage gals.
Do not think of fulfilling your own selfish sicko desires at the expense of fuelling other people's mind with the right to rape or have sex with underage gals.
Consider about the consequences and the after effects first before you try to exert your own rights to have a proper discussion. Like I have mentioned, certain topics are taboo to me. So leave me out of your sick ambitions.
You ask me if I know you personally well of course not, neither do you know me personally. But at least I have given you enough respect to understand your intentions. And I have in no way made fun of your objection towards child sex. But rather, you have done nothing but throw insults at me and aimed to provoke me. Look back at your own posts, wasn't that what you were trying to do?
I did ask you to speak out but not against the people posting in the thread. You yourself should be the one to go back and read yourself the first time I quoted you. To repeat to you after so many times of telling you, I am not for child sex or child prostitution. You are just sore that I quoted you.
I am against such acts and rather than choose to just sweep under the carpet, such things should be dealt with but carefully of course. So perhaps the guy who posted that thread lacked sensitivity. Anyway, you have been too carried away by my quoting you and you have let your anger actually get the better of you.
Your words about considering consequences is good and valid, but I would like to tell you not to direct your anger and frustrations at the wrong people. I am against child sex, so I object to it and would be against it, so are you saying I'm a sick person for being against child sex?
Like you said, if certain topics are taboo to you or displease you, you have the right and the choice to click elsewhere.
Once again, I just want to say to you that you have let your anger and your pride get the better of you. You are just unhappy that I had quoted you and made a comment about your post., hence you've gone on your personal hate war against me. When all this while I have supported your stand against rape and child sex.
Come on, you were the one being personal for no good bl00dy reason and are too proud to admit it. -
Parn, I did ask you to speak out but not against me but rather against child sex itself. You however for some weird reason mistook that as an invitation to flame me. Which is what you have been doing. By all means say what you don't like about child sex or rape, but don't vent your anger on me just because I quoted you.
You have time and time again misread my posts so I am urging you, stop letting your anger get the better of you. You're like a bull in a china shop. -
Parn, stop letting your ego and your temper get the better of you.
-
Then I cannot help you any further if you cannot or don't want to realise what you have done.
And stop sending me your stupid pm. Go and get a farking life and grow up...you are obviously a young punk. -
Guys guys its late liao
Go watch soccer, England vs Portugal -
Originally posted by parn:Then I cannot help you any further if you cannot or don't want to realise what you have done.
And stop sending me your stupid pm. Go and get a farking life and grow up...you are obviously a young punk.
-
This is going to my last post to help you realise your actions.
I speak up as you've challenged and not against the person who has started this topic.Originally posted by SumOne:So you're against it, then speak up against it. But not against the person who starts the thread. It's a different thing if he advocates it but in this case he doesn't.
I have seen the rape threads and honestly I find the threads so lame. I also see that the thread could have been phrased differently to avoid so much backlash. I believe the guy who started the rape thread merely wants to understand what goes on in the mind of a rapist when he comitts an act of rape.
Besides, despite his poor attempt at starting a thread, I feel the people in this forum are too quick too flame each other and post lame comments. Sometimes people just want to start a proper discussion but a lot of people here seem to like being mean to them rather than be constructive.
And what the f.u.c.k is this?Originally posted by SumOne:is nothing but a personal attack. I wonder what is the moderators stand on such a pesonal attack?
Talking about things that are immoral doesn't make you an immoral person. It depends on what context you discuss rape and child sex.
Child Prostitution in Thailand is very rampant, and articles in magazines and newspapers have talked about it before. So do you deem those articles immoral? Talking about it doesn't mean you support it, in fact, it can strengthen your stand AGAINST it.
You have a f.u.c.k.i.n.g attitude problem, and YOU are the one who needs help. Nobody here is trying to pick a fight with you or anything so quit being so bl00dy personal. If you're just in the forums here to rail at people than I hope you f.u.c.k off!!!
Once again I wonder, what have the moderators got to say about you? Trying to convince me that talking about child prostitution is not immoral?
''Talking about things that are immoral doesn't make you an immoral person.''
You've got nothing else to talk about except for immoral stuffs?
Go back to your previous postings if you dare and read them again before you come and send me your "Hey dude..." pm okie? Who's your f.u.c.king dude? Dude ki lan ah....
Suck my cock and call me daddy okie?
-
YOU need to realise your actions.Originally posted by parn:This is going to my last post to help you realise your actions.
I do have other things to talk about, but not with you. Especially since you keep mis-reading what I post.
And what the f.u.c.k is this? Trying to convince me that talking about child prostitution is not immoral?
[/quote]
Talking about it doesn't mean you approve of it, talking about it can mean you're against it. Saying you are against rape or against child prostitution is talking about it. So NO, talking about it is not necessarily immoral.''Talking about things that are immoral doesn't make you an immoral person.''
You've got nothing else to talk about except for immoral stuffs?
I obviously dare read them and I definitely dare pm you. I'm hoping to tell you that I am not your enemy, although you seem very bent on making me your enemy. There is nothing wrong with my posts, it's just that you keep mis-reading them. So go read them yourself in a more calm state of mind. Your own anger has twisted the meaning of my words to you.
Go back to your previous postings if you dare and read them again before you come and send me your "Hey dude..." pm okie? Who's your f.u.c.king dude? Dude ki lan ah.... [quote]Suck my cock and call me daddy okie?Yet again, you've let your anger get the better of you. I ask you here why you are so personal with me and you say it's because of what I replied you in another thread, only proves that you are just being personal. As far as I know, this thread has no link with the other except your constant personal attacks on me.
I tell you again, you have mis-read my posts and twisted the meaning. Go figure. -
Nobody can help you either if you don't realise what YOU have done.Originally posted by parn:Then I cannot help you any further if you cannot or don't want to realise what you have done.
And stop sending me your stupid pm. Go and get a farking life and grow up...you are obviously a young punk. -
Yep was watching. Too bad Rooney came off though.Originally posted by laurence82:Guys guys its late liao
Go watch soccer, England vs Portugal -
As already said, neither of us know each other personally, so you don't really know if I'm young or not do you? Your posts don't exactly show your maturity as somebody born in 1976 though on the internet, who can tell?Originally posted by parn:Then I cannot help you any further if you cannot or don't want to realise what you have done.
And stop sending me your stupid pm. Go and get a farking life and grow up...you are obviously a young punk.
You are flaming me here for something I posted in another thread which wasn't even a personal attack, says a lot about your own character and maturity doesn't it? -
Parn, you're the one who's too serious. Lighten up.
-
huh?
-
if u don't appricate the doings of others to spice up our lives at least u can shut up
-
Originally posted by Nelstar:Full Squad of Portugal, Analysis by Nelstar.
Alexandre Ricardo : 8.5/10
Made a small mistake but concede no soft goals. Was the real man at the last line when defenders flanked on both sides to attack.
Jorge Andrade : 6.5/10
Had an average game and was unable to really sort out threats like Michael Owen.
Luis Miguel : 7/10
Assisted in the some of the pretty offensive moves, but always lacking in defending service.
Jorge Nuno Valente : 7/10
Stood back in defence, was looking quite spaced out and slow to match speedy attackers.
Alberto Ricardo Carvalho: 7.5/10
Awesome in defence, but oftenly slower than real threat like Darius Vassell.
Francisco Costinha : 8/10
Cost Portugal the first goal, but showed determination to assist the back four and was part of the pretty offensive moves. Always lurking to head the ball in.
Luis Figo : 8/10
Was everywhere in the attack. Stamped his authority left right centre of the offense but concentrated a bit too much on holding the ball.
Cristiano Ronaldo : 8.5/10
The true man who cheated English defenders. Ashley Cole, Gary Neville had some run-ins with this classy player. Did not showed his tricks but however showed good character in passing and chasing speedy attackers to aid defence.
Nuno Maniche: 8/10
Great player who often dispossess opponents and did lot of linking with the rest of the players.
Anderson Deco: 9/10
Not one of his best, but definitely was rock on the right side of defence where he retreated to assist in defensive duties when there was a player switch. A versatile, skillful, player who overall looked the best for the portugese.
Miguel Nuno Gomes: 7.5/10
Lurking constantly. Doing a lot of running but always letting David James get the better of him from set pieces.
Substitutes:
Helder Postiga : 7.5/10
Scored a goal, scored an audacious goal from the spot during penalty taking. Was unable to really blow the defence apart.
Manuel Rui Costa : 9/10
Though he missed the spot kick for penalty taking, he responded entirely over the field to stamp his authority like Luis Figo did. A real classy player who scored a brilliant screamer. Definitely, a match winner. -
Originally posted by Nelstar:Full Squad Analysis (England) by Nelstar
David James : 8/10
He already gave his best. Definitely looking more like a goalkeeper than his constant absence previously during spotkicks and corner kicks. Misjudged and allowed Postiga to head in the equaliser.
Gary Neville : 8.5/10
Was part of the offensive moves in the second half, but showed good quality preventing direct shots locking on the right flank.
Ashley Cole : 8/10
Forced Cristiano Ronaldo to often pass the ball around and was part of one of the offensive moves in the left flank. However, sometimes caught out by the skilful crosses to Ronaldo. Did clear a few of the crosses through heading the ball away.
John Terry : 7.5/10
Had most of his job done well by Cole, Neville and Campbell. Headed clear one or twice. Was simply around to do a shadowing over the ball, thus preventing any real threats direct at the goal.
Sol Campbell : 8.5/10
Rock in defence, headed and did most of the air clearance in absence of a solid aerial defender. Used his experience well to close in on threats.
Steven Gerrard : 8/10
Other than being the the pole position of the defence from midfield, he hardly contributed to the attacking flow as the Portugese dominated with possession. Tried very hard to dispossess the Portugese.
David Beckham: 6/10
Captain? Free kick specialist? He probably only ran in the second half of extra time. Definitely shown that he was outplayed by the Portugese.
Paul Scholes: 5.5/10
MIA. This man is missing in action. He looks lost, had trouble intercepting balls. Missing in the offensive moves and looked like a terrible statue in midfield outplayed by a skilful portugese side.
Frank Lampard : 8.5/10
The real winner of the English Side. Definitely did well to defend and attack and dispossess the opponent. Score a goal when he had a chance. A real match winner, too bad on the wrong side.
Wayne Rooney : 4/10
Wayne what? Looney? Where is he? Injured ankle? hahaha. Golden boy of English soccer? Isn't he heading home to see papa after England is gone? Bye bye Looney. See you in World Cup.
Michael Owen: 8/10
Lurker. Looks dangerous hiding and showed predatory skills with his third minute goal. Looking tired and rather outplayed in second half.
Substitutes:
Phil Neville: 6/10
Did some defending. Enjoyed running into covered areas. You sure he played well in Man. United?
Darius Vassell: 7/10
Did some runs, but was never in the right and dangerous places. More like a lost horse on a canter and slowly galloping into wrong and difficult to score areas.
Owen Hargreaves: 9/10
Outstanding. He showed Paul Scholes how to be a midfielder. He was at the right places, right time, did some real running and played real well. If only he could link up well enough with the rest he would be perfect. -
Tomorrow shalt be France VS Greece!
Lookout for NelStar's commentary! -
Parn SumOne
life||||||||||||||||||||||||| life||||||||||||||||||||||||
pwer||||||||||||||||||||| power|||||||||||||||||
Parn vs SumOne round 1
|
^ FIGHT!!!! -
Luckily I didn't put money on England.
-
10 cent, 20 cents?
-
Don't be a chewdren lah.
-
ok....first to clarify, i'm nt on any side...the onli way to stop all these aimless flaming is to maybe ask d admin to make you one temporary moderator (less d bj).Originally posted by SumOne:Just wondering parn, why are you being so personal against me? ...(ok, sorry, but i just find this corny).
Yes, you raised up the problem..tts fine..but talk the talk is cheap - this thread you started ain't gng anywhere... If you can do a better job than d present one, then nobody wld ever flame u or doubt you. in other words, you r nt only justifying wat u said to d rest of d ppl but most important of all, to yourself.
Yes, you may protest n say ' why d need to become a moderator?'
Well, i can tell u, since you raised up d problem(whether it's true or nt) n u chose nt to leave d forum, i reckon you wld ve some constructive solutions (or maybe even one) to it. You ve got to realise tt, one nt only has to been responsible for wat he/she said but also d probable consequences or watever tt comes out of d discussion; definitely when things are getting nowhere. Since you wanted to stay on, n nobody can meet your request/requirement then take over d rein. Do you know wat i mean? Hope you don't get personal on wat i said, as i'm only directing at d matter itself.
Eg. when u go to work/or are working. You can't raise any issue in a meeting without being responsible for wat u said, esp when nobody can/or want to do abt it.
if you can pin-point a real problem, fine..good job...but if u can't/or dun wan to do anything abt it and so is every one else, let it be or walk away frm tt point.
Cheers!