How to ensure security in MRT station if CCTV cameras ...
-
if you haven't read it properly, don't try to comment yah?
Originally posted by sgboy2004:blah blah blah...u got any concrete suggest..if not...*ahem* -
He can't do anything to you lahOriginally posted by FireIce:dunno leh
later lunchtime i go ask him he see liao wat will he do
So many ladies around -
o level nia, how to read properly when the ang mo so chimologyOriginally posted by the Bear:if you haven't read it properly, don't try to comment yah? -
pesticide ?Originally posted by FireIce:u heard wrong
my current brand of perfume is Shieldtox
-
Odourless? Means I can actually poison people with it unknowingly?Originally posted by sbst275:Which one? Got odourless one leh.. -
SMRT increase fare because their Ops cost had gone up. (so they say...)Originally posted by SilverPal:This is a little too incredible.
Anyway, I remember SMRT increased the fares to pay for armed marshalls on board MRTs and in stations right?
I noticed that these armed personnel are from SPF, isn't SPF paying their salaries? How come SMRT need to increase fares to pay them?
But really, its also to increase profits. I've not seem the system buy new trains to replace the old once. Some are so ricketty that I find its scary to ride in them - and Sway sway one day the brake don't work... during rush hour...
SPF salary is from our tax. -
Baygon be too strongOriginally posted by crazy monkey:pesticide ? -
SMRT have been cutting cost..
Where got op cost increase?
Last time train 6 mins, now 8 mins -
so, are you saying that you are not educated enough to read simple english?
if so, you can stop lying now
oh well... nevermind.. your delusions, your silly vendetta...
no one really cares except yourself
back to the topic...
what the heck are CCTVs for then if they failed in their primary function of "security" ?Originally posted by sgboy2004:o level nia, how to read properly when the ang mo so chimology -
yeah, cut cost by not turning on the CCTVsOriginally posted by sbst275:SMRT have been cutting cost..
Where got op cost increase?
Last time train 6 mins, now 8 mins -
Even have, platform one on niaOriginally posted by FireIce:yeah, cut cost by not turning on the CCTVs -
because now use toilet is freeOriginally posted by sbst275:SMRT have been cutting cost..
Where got op cost increase?
Last time train 6 mins, now 8 mins -
No dustbins, no additional cleaners needed.Originally posted by sbst275:SMRT have been cutting cost..
Where got op cost increase?
Last time train 6 mins, now 8 mins -
KNSOriginally posted by crazy monkey:because now use toilet is free
That cost is peanuts to them -
see...chim ang mo again... wait hor, mi go check dictionary first hor...hmm, where is my dict har?... nvm lah, ang mo kia ang mo mi no understand one lah...wahhahahahaaaaOriginally posted by the Bear:so, are you saying that you are not educated enough to read simple english?
if so, you can stop lying now
oh well... nevermind.. your delusions, your silly vendetta...
no one really cares except yourself
back to the topic...
what the heck are CCTVs for then if they failed in their primary function of "security" ? -
Dustbins cost writeoff back in 1988 liaoOriginally posted by ditzy:No dustbins, no additional cleaners needed.
No Add Cleaners? Toilet leh? Forgot, not all stn have toilets unlike NEL -
last time ppl throw rubbish in binsOriginally posted by ditzy:No dustbins, no additional cleaners needed.
now they throw on floor so need more cleaners -
Their op costs is being more than covered by their massive profits!Originally posted by mistyblue:SMRT increase fare because their Ops cost had gone up. (so they say...)
But really, its also to increase profits. I've not seem the system buy new trains to replace the old once. Some are so ricketty that I find its scary to ride in them - and Sway sway one day the brake don't work... during rush hour...
SPF salary is from our tax. -
Ohoh...Originally posted by crazy monkey:last time ppl throw rubbish in bins
now they throw on floor so need more cleaners -
Massive?Originally posted by SilverPal:Their op costs is being more than covered by their massive profits!
To them, FY2004 profit actually plunged 40% if not for the writeback -
still massiveOriginally posted by sbst275:Massive?
To them, FY2004 profit actually plunged 40% if not for the writeback -
Yah lah...Originally posted by crazy monkey:still massive
They did not use $$ to buy buses in FY2004... Nothing incurred...
But cut cost liao profit still plunge? Simi logic? -
management got pay increases and more bonusesOriginally posted by sbst275:Yah lah...
They did not use $$ to buy buses in FY2004... Nothing incurred...
But cut cost liao profit still plunge? Simi logic? -
Yah yah yahOriginally posted by crazy monkey:management got pay increases and more bonuses
Then staff wages, dun wanna increase... They should have went on strike!
-
profit?
hmm.. thought it was a "public service" ?
i wonder if they mean anything when they talked about "security" because this sure as heck doesn't look like any "security" happened