another 33 caught for downloading music?
-
You mean who? Your ISP has a log, dun even need physical address.Originally posted by dranoel maxwell:although they can't track your ip address they still can track your physical address in your computer cause every computer got it's own uique physical address and is the one and only in the world....
Btw .. your physical address isn't visible in IP packets .. how to track unless the software leaks it? -
how leh explain can? if then how the 33 people?Originally posted by Icemoon:You mean who? Your ISP has a log, dun even need physical address.
Btw .. your physical address isn't visible in IP packets .. how to track unless the software leaks it? -
easily done. if they use P2P, then you just capture their IP. So easy.Originally posted by Alfresco coffeeshop:how leh explain can? if then how the 33 people? -
so u saying P2p has this vulnerability?Originally posted by Icemoon:easily done. if they use P2P, then you just capture their IP. So easy. -
FYI big mistake, i wonder what's the use of IP showing in P2p?
-
But what about the 3 bloggers?
-
ya.Originally posted by Mr Soh:so u saying P2p has this vulnerability?
BitTorrent even enforces this vulnerability 'cos creator Bram Cohen wanted the transactions to be accountable. -
Dunno .. I didn't follow the news how they got caught.Originally posted by Mr Soh:But what about the 3 bloggers?
But conceivably .. I can reverse DNS their blog url .. then check with the logs from the major ISPs. See which joker access the blog IP at that specific time and date (of blog creation).
Ok method is dumb but at least i'm creative .. haahahah -
it may not show in P2P .. but it should show up in your netstat if you are connected to him.Originally posted by Mr Soh:FYI big mistake, i wonder what's the use of IP showing in P2p?
-
Recording companies are still making money despite this dl-ing thing. So isn't it a win-win situation if dl-ing music is legal? On one hand they won't starve to death on the other hand people can download music for free. And it's not like everybody will be downloading and not buying the CD.
Commercialism. -
where the $$$$ from the fine goes to???
-
the burning QOriginally posted by Itachi:where the $$$$ from the fine goes to??? 
-
If not wrong a "trap" was set out for them perhaps?Originally posted by Icemoon:it may not show in P2P .. but it should show up in your netstat if you are connected to him. -
care to tell more about IP spoofing?Originally posted by Icemoon:Dunno .. I didn't follow the news how they got caught.
But conceivably .. I can reverse DNS their blog url .. then check with the logs from the major ISPs. See which joker access the blog IP at that specific time and date (of blog creation).
Ok method is dumb but at least i'm creative .. haahahah -
The concept of IP spoofing, was initially discussed in academic circles in the 1980's. While known about for sometime, it was primarily theoretical until Robert Morris, whose son wrote the first Internet Worm, discovered a security weakness in the TCP protocol known as sequence prediction. Stephen Bellovin discussed the problem in-depth in Security Problems in the TCP/IP Protocol Suite, a paper that addressed design problems with the TCP/IP protocol suite. Another infamous attack, Kevin Mitnick's Christmas Day crack of Tsutomu Shimomura's machine, employed the IP spoofing and TCP sequence prediction techniques. While the popularity of such cracks has decreased due to the demise of the services they exploited, spoofing can still be used and needs to be addressed by all security administrators........Originally posted by Mr Soh:care to tell more about IP spoofing? -
i wonder if there is a classification?
they were caught downloading music. does that mean they did not download movies?
do they take action separately?
what about softwares?
so complicated. -
inventors of PC also at fault.Originally posted by ditzy:The inventors of the internet should be jailed. Fancy allowing data to flow across networks freely. What a joke.
-
Are we to say that inventors of cell-phones are at fault bcos of the recent spate of extortions? Or that airplanes should not have been created bcos of 9/11?Originally posted by Mr Fugue:inventors of PC also at fault.
It is a matter of cost-benefit analysis I guess. -
Those 33 downloaders were caught becoz warnings were sent to them warning them to stop downloading or action will be taken against them.They did not heed those warnings and the rest ...we all know wad happen...
-
Can be done, I suppose, but will probably destroy the end to end service functionality of TCP?Originally posted by Mr Soh:care to tell more about IP spoofing? -
Psst~!!Originally posted by SBS1908B:Are we to say that inventors of cell-phones are at fault bcos of the recent spate of extortions? Or that airplanes should not have been created bcos of 9/11?
It is a matter of cost-benefit analysis I guess.
it's sarcasm. -
i hope they issue warnings first before issuing a summon.Originally posted by lpx88:Those 33 downloaders were caught becoz warnings were sent to them warning them to stop downloading or action will be taken against them.They did not heed those warnings and the rest ...we all know wad happen... -
do they also issue warnings for murder??Originally posted by dragg:i hope they issue warnings first before issuing a summon. -
First time the law come out say won't really target home users, now these!!
haiz, dun use major file sharing programs lor -
they do .. one of the decalogue isOriginally posted by Mr Fugue:do they also issue warnings for murder??
"thou shall not murder"