hahahaaaaOriginally posted by mahai107:tell you what...if i stuff a huge cucumber up your rotting chee.bai, will that shut you up for good? my alsatian roger is looking for a date this weekend. maybe he can take you out for a nice dinner and then shag the hell out of your chao chee.bai later...call me 95247845...i'll see what i can do for a chao chee.bai like you...
Hmmmm, this is called self-centered? Then others' actions who are worse will be termed with what word from your everlasting vast vocabulary of mostly which are only vulgarities?Originally posted by qwertyzx:You are just one selfish , self-centred idiot who dont know how to think and has a brain of cow. You guys only think of how to please yrself?? You must learn how to think of girls and put their needs first.
He deserve to be given a slap for showing his ciee.bye attitude , throwing flower. I give him my sh.it in his dinner to eat and whack his face upside.
He still have a long way to go for his character . the things he did was a wussy pussy gay and the girl would be better off whack him .
No girl would want bad sh.itty guys and u guys better behave well or elsee.....
the girls would dump u like shi.t into the rubbish dumb. U guys must know and listen to the girls.
signz, no point quarrelling wif a clone. as far as i see, this noob is asking for a ban and registering without reading instruction.Originally posted by launtpc:Hmmmm, this is called self-centered? Then others' actions who are worse will be termed with what word from your everlasting vast vocabulary of mostly which are only vulgarities?
Apparently the self-centered mind of yours (yes, you have one too, based on your very obvious biased way of interpreting such a simple few paragraphs of English text) thinks that every man will enjoy a good day in office and work, and will have to pamper everybody he sees or whom he shares a close relationship to.
As you have known, (sorry, I take that back -- you wouldn't have known this, in your little pea-brain) quarrels are common in relationships, as gladly pointed out by a sensible forumer in this fast-growing thread.
Putting others' needs in front of you may prove fatal as points of time. Obviously, the person being pampered will, according to a nice Chinese proverb de2 chun4 jing4 che3 (getting an inch and demanding a foot, meaning that the person will want more than what he received).
There is always a boundary limit to things. There is no one in the world who can maintain a cool temper throughout every day, and have the knowledge of dealing with bumps in relationships. Men and women's minds work differently. And this is why communication exists, so that both can understand each other better.
You think (sorry, you don't think -- you whine) that the threadstarter is showing attitude? How about you have a bad day in office and I would want to see how you treat your partner, if you even have one, which I can confidently bet that you lack.
We better behave? Who are you to dictate, as though you are a dictator, our standard code of behavior? No one can control what someone else does, except maybe through law. I doubt the lawmakers in Parliament who has much higher intellect than what you possess are as eccentric as you enough to pass such a law.
Who says that the threadstarter did not listen? He attemped to salvage the situation, but it was his partner who unfortunately rejected it. Although I have to agree that he should be persisted as what many others would do, I felt that you cannot term him as "not listening". This again shows how poor your interpretation skills are.
And before you attempt to fight back towards my arguments, please do not use vulgarities. Although you might argue saying that "who am I to lay down these rules", but at least you can partially recover your already tarnished image.
It's a long time since I wrote a point-by-point essay blasting of a clone anyway. This clone comfirm died.Originally posted by 798:signz, no point quarrelling wif a clone. as far as i see, this noob is asking for a ban and registering without reading instruction.
hahahaOriginally posted by launtpc:Hmmmm, this is called self-centered? Then others' actions who are worse will be termed with what word from your everlasting vast vocabulary of mostly which are only vulgarities?
Apparently the self-centered mind of yours (yes, you have one too, based on your very obvious biased way of interpreting such a simple few paragraphs of English text) thinks that every man will enjoy a good day in office and work, and will have to pamper everybody he sees or whom he shares a close relationship to.
As you have known, (sorry, I take that back -- you wouldn't have known this, in your little pea-brain) quarrels are common in relationships, as gladly pointed out by a sensible forumer in this fast-growing thread.
Putting others' needs in front of you may prove fatal as points of time. Obviously, the person being pampered will, according to a nice Chinese proverb de2 chun4 jing4 che3 (getting an inch and demanding a foot, meaning that the person will want more than what he received).
There is always a boundary limit to things. There is no one in the world who can maintain a cool temper throughout every day, and have the knowledge of dealing with bumps in relationships. Men and women's minds work differently. And this is why communication exists, so that both can understand each other better.
You think (sorry, you don't think -- you whine) that the threadstarter is showing attitude? How about you have a bad day in office and I would want to see how you treat your partner, if you even have one, which I can confidently bet that you lack.
We better behave? Who are you to dictate, as though you are a dictator, our standard code of behavior? No one can control what someone else does, except maybe through law. I doubt the lawmakers in Parliament who has much higher intellect than what you possess are as eccentric as you enough to pass such a law.
Who says that the threadstarter did not listen? He attemped to salvage the situation, but it was his partner who unfortunately rejected it. Although I have to agree that he should be persisted as what many others would do, I felt that you cannot term him as "not listening". This again shows how poor your interpretation skills are.
And before you attempt to fight back towards my arguments, please do not use vulgarities. Although you might argue saying that "who am I to lay down these rules", but at least you can partially recover your already tarnished image.
pple will label such gals are stupid. but forgiveness is one way of exercising true love.Originally posted by CryoLind:/jump up!
i know i know...I've read his story...
He got affair with his gf's sister... both will steal kisses or wat when gf's not looking..
BUt it seems like it was found out by his gf liao? But stupid woman still wants him hor? HOw come?![]()
I could have anticipated a much more better reply than that. Apparently you once again proved me wrong.Originally posted by qwertyzx:hahaha
u trying to act smart by writing such stupid senseless paragraph of yours???
Ya, u and your paper or pea size brain only come and give excuses for your wrongs. In the first place, he should not throw temper even when he has bad day. then the gf dont have bad day??
U try to act goody by not vulgar. i bet u are more vulgar than anyone!ya, u are the self-centred one and dumb, cos u always copy my words.
of course u have to put others' needs first, if not, then prove u self-centred. Idiot.
You are one pretentious idiot and next time if u dont come up with a better story, u better keep your mouth shut.
U the clone as mahai07 and .......
Your mother a disgrace born u this chi.ee bye. stink rotten lan jiao
But not many people will read posts within a thread bearing other vulgar posts?Originally posted by 798:pple will label such gals are stupid. but forgiveness is one way of exercising true love.
regardless forum_man's stories was true or not, i felt he deserved a second chance. n let us not passing death sentence to him since we are not in his shoe.
yes, he was harsh n foolish for hurting his gf. but at least he amended his mistakes the second day.![]()
ya, it shows that most here are guys support the guys wrongs.Originally posted by binZ:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thank your for your... how should I put that -- enlightening post.Originally posted by intellect1:ya, it shows that most here are guys support the guys wrongs.
just a bunch of lamers. all the girls can see.
dat why i felt these pple are too goody-good shoes.... or simply nickists just that the threadstarter posted topics dat invited flame before.Originally posted by launtpc:But not many people will read posts within a thread bearing other vulgar posts?![]()
Originally posted by launtpc:I could have anticipated a much more better reply than that. Apparently you once again proved me wrong.
Of couse my paragraphs would prove senseless to you -- one could have easily compared it to talking to a cow.
You have missed out one of my points that no one can keep their tempers in check at every single moment one is confronted with a situation one would least want to see. You questioned about his partner not having a bad day -- I would not deny that, but at least if you had read his post carefully enough, you would have at least knew that he tried within his means to cheer her up and light up the situation. I believe this is what he intended to do.
Did I copy your words? I merely rebutted them. You say that a good person must always put others' needs first... then why not show us how then? You think that the human psychology barrier can be easily overcome? You think that even the greatest human can not be self-centered at times?
So obviously you are the one who is more self-centered than me, as you cannot even put others' thoughts in front of youself, let alone others' needs.
Am I a pretentious idiot, and a clone? It is up to you to judge, as others who are here and had been here for a longer time would have known. Only you would hide behind the screen of yours pretending as though it were a veil covering your tracks?
i wonder who registered just to say this again?Originally posted by launtpc:Thank your for your... how should I put that -- enlightening post.![]()
ha ha u the chicken 798 and your name is numbers.Originally posted by 798:i wonder who registered just to say this again?
too coward n chicken to post wif their real nick i suppose.
It's all up to you and what small little arguments you tell.Originally posted by qwertyzx:![]()
![]()
![]()
only when u see then trying to say that u know. but actually u dont know alot of things u scum. Ya, u are the pretentious idiot and u are the clone.
yes that is u .
next time u better write more sensible things instead of stupid story of yours.]
You making A FOOL OF YOUR SELF AND ALSO YOUR MOTHER!!
SO U saying others should not put others first. which show u idiot and self-centred paper brain of yours.
Your story would prove stupid not only to me but everyone.
u better behave u chi.ee bye. face and rotten lan jiao clone of maihai07 etc.....
so many clones here talking to their own.Originally posted by launtpc:But not many people will read posts within a thread bearing other vulgar posts?![]()
well, i suppose u make a very "intelligent" post, NOOB!Originally posted by intellect1:ha ha u the chicken 798 and your name is numbers.
u worst than cat! and u yourself hiding behind numbers?![]()
![]()
![]()
I would only support the people whom I believe in my knowledge who is right. Of course my opinion is objectionable, but at least I support my reasons in an appopriate manner.Originally posted by qwertyzx:so many clones here talking to their own.
i agree with intellect that guys here trying to cover up their wrongs.
lamers.........![]()
![]()
He can hid behind numbers, yet you hide behind a clone. Tell me, are you worse than him?Originally posted by intellect1:ha ha u the chicken 798 and your name is numbers.
u worst than cat! and u yourself hiding behind numbers?![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by launtpc:It's all up to you and what small little arguments you tell.
There is simply no use in fighting back when your opponent misses the point you are trying to make totally, when it is due to the poor language grasp your opponent has.
I said that there is a limit to how much you should put others in front of you. I trust you to miss that, too.
And I question that do you know everything as well?
No? Then why the fuss of me not knowing something minor when you don't know the major points of my arguments?
So you and your dedicated army of clone slaves are going to bombard this thread? Go ahead, be my guest. Is this a story? To a learned person, no. To you, yes.![]()
Clones will warm it with their hell flames.Originally posted by Nurofen:woo...so hot in here
/leaves my frozen pizza
Ya u are worse than a chicken , dumbo, u hid behind numbers and words, look who is worst.Originally posted by launtpc:He can hid behind numbers, yet you hide behind a clone. Tell me, are you worse than him?![]()
My English is "poor" in your opinion because you don't know what I'm saying.Originally posted by qwertyzx:![]()
![]()
![]()
Ya u and your poor language and u cannot even write proper english.
That stupid argument of yourself prove u cannot even write with sense but shows u have cow sense.
get lost u stupid clones and dont try to act noble here as if u know anything.
prove yourself a idiot. U better shut up unless u can write some good story all would know.
Your rotten dick head is just what yr head is!!![]()
![]()