anyone irritated by christians here?
-
no yawning shows that im bored with what u have to say, which is: nothing useful or importantOriginally posted by sgFish:yawning is a vain attempt to appear cool to the general public.
saying that all the above is rubbish just shows your ignorance
the last line, thats just a provocative remark.
in essence, you don't have any points to make
good day and God bless
and like i said, its rubbish. If u think that shows my 'ignorance', well I guess it shows you're real ignorance isn't it? Of course I don't have any points to make. The point is already long established: Xtians are irritating.
If u believe that dissing me will send u to heaven, go ahead. Oh and quit the 'good day n god bless' thing. Coming after dissing me? Its too fake, hypocrite. Try harder to appear sincere and maybe more ppl will convert. If all else fails, try threatening to burn us 'heretics' at stake. -
The fact that you ignore rational points that are given to refute your argument just for the sake of thinking you're correct, shows real ignorance. Stubbornness and refusal to accept change, an attribute always labeled to Christians as a whole, is what you're showing here. Isn't that hypocritical?Originally posted by HENG@:no yawning shows that im bored with what u have to say, which is: nothing useful or important
and like i said, its rubbish. If u think that shows my 'ignorance', well I guess it shows you're real ignorance isn't it? Of course I don't have any points to make. The point is already long established: Xtians are irritating.
If u believe that dissing me will send u to heaven, go ahead. Oh and quit the 'good day n god bless' thing. Coming after dissing me? Its too fake, hypocrite. Try harder to appear sincere and maybe more ppl will convert. If all else fails, try threatening to burn us 'heretics' at stake.
I honestly wished you a good day and the blessings of God, and i was hoping that you'd think through your points. If you take it that I was being fake and hypocritical, I have to apologise then. -
i think this thread will answer the topic question
-
lets just say i don't have to accept something i don't see as rational. its up to u to convince me of their rationality and you have failed, because there is more evidence against your so-called rationality. And at least i show stubborness against something of insufficient evidence to be proven. As for refusal to accept change, how does my rejection of yr theory as being invalid show refusal to change? Show more evidence that can pursuade otherwise than the higher amt of evidence already in existance, and i will consider. I've revised my opinion of things more often than u'd know. But thats still better than Xtians who show stubborness and refuse to accept change even with overwhelming evidence in favour of something. And all they can use to justify this stubborness and refusal to change is a dinky little book of inaccuracies written by other humans. You're really one to talk, hypo. What else can u do other than accuse me of everything I've said u are? Can't even be original can u? I suppose next u're going to accuse me of not being original too. Of course now that I said that, u won't accuse me of that. And since I said that as well, u're still doing what I say u'll do or not do. No originality at all...Originally posted by sgFish:The fact that you ignore rational points that are given to refute your argument just for the sake of thinking you're correct, shows real ignorance. Stubbornness and refusal to accept change, an attribute always labeled to Christians as a whole, is what you're showing here. Isn't that hypocritical?
I honestly wished you a good day and the blessings of God, and i was hoping that you'd think through your points. If you take it that I was being fake and hypocritical, I have to apologise then. -
seriously, its only recently that christians are so hiong to convert ppl, last time don hv, so isnt it the pastors or wadever telling them to do?
like so wadever he's doing did get lotsa ppl to join and giv him money, but seriously alot ppl also dislike christians.
so waddahell, u will go to hell if ure christian, how does ur own medicine taste liek -
I quote you:Originally posted by HENG@:lets just say i don't have to accept something i don't see as rational. its up to u to convince me of their rationality and you have failed, because there is more evidence against your so-called rationality. And at least i show stubborness against something of insufficient evidence to be proven. As for refusal to accept change, how does my rejection of yr theory as being invalid show refusal to change? Show more evidence that can pursuade otherwise than the higher amt of evidence already in existance, and i will consider. I've revised my opinion of things more often than u'd know. But thats still better than Xtians who show stubborness and refuse to accept change even with overwhelming evidence in favour of something. And all they can use to justify this stubborness and refusal to change is a dinky little book of inaccuracies written by other humans. You're really one to talk, hypo. What else can u do other than accuse me of everything I've said u are? Can't even be original can u? I suppose next u're going to accuse me of not being original too. Of course now that I said that, u won't accuse me of that. And since I said that as well, u're still doing what I say u'll do or not do. No originality at all...
"oh please u can take the earth as a reference point and u won't even get something remotely close to a circle. the mathematics would totally go wrong."
If you do take the earth as a reference point, and trace the movement of the sun, it is exactly the same path the earth takes around the sun, just in the other direction. This can be proven by drawing it out or using a computer graphical suite.
so far, you have not went on to disprove any of my points, asides from saying they're "rubbish". and it isn't my theory that you're talking about. I didn't come up with it. Scientists with far greater background than me did that. And I produced some evidence here, and you have not. I would very much like to see your "overwhelming evidence". Please do so instead of just merely attacking me not my points. -
If we are going to link anything to God but say it is not a religion, isn't it contradicting?Originally posted by breytonhartge:That is sad, because I know so many that are not.
Christianity is not a self orientated religion, it is not even a relgion. What Christianity means is that it is a personal relationship with God. Just you and Him.
The bible tells us what God and Jesus have done for us. It ultimately is up to you to make the decision whether to believe and accept or not. Only you and God know what is happening between the two of you.
God Bless. -
Christians always have had the responsibility to share the gospel throughout the past 2000 years, nothing's changed.Originally posted by phanta5y:seriously, its only recently that christians are so hiong to convert ppl, last time don hv, so isnt it the pastors or wadever telling them to do?
like so wadever he's doing did get lotsa ppl to join and giv him money, but seriously alot ppl also dislike christians.
so waddahell, u will go to hell if ure christian, how does ur own medicine taste liek
oh we will? Your logic is rather interesting. -
according to the muslims and jews, u are going to hell. we'll see who has the last laugh.Originally posted by sgFish:Christians always have had the responsibility to share the gospel throughout the past 2000 years, nothing's changed.
oh we will? Your logic is rather interesting. -
according to them, so will you =)Originally posted by HENG@:according to the muslims and jews, u are going to hell. we'll see who has the last laugh.
anything to say about my above response to you?
as in the previous post, not the above line -
-
This is getting boring... *yawn*
-
Doubt it's recently. They have all the while been very fierce in spreading such things. The only difference is whether they have gone overboard. Seriously, I have to call up the police for harrassment because they are harrassing non-stop just to get me to convert. And they are real extreme. Plus, they are the ones who are racists. Says Catholics are bad. Says Muslims are bad. Claim theirs is the best.Originally posted by phanta5y:seriously, its only recently that christians are so hiong to convert ppl, last time don hv, so isnt it the pastors or wadever telling them to do?
like so wadever he's doing did get lotsa ppl to join and giv him money, but seriously alot ppl also dislike christians.
so waddahell, u will go to hell if ure christian, how does ur own medicine taste liek -
Of course, I know I won't. So that doesn't bother me.Originally posted by sgFish:according to them, so will you =)
anything to say about my above response to you?
As for your response, i din't even bother reading it. U've already demonstrated u've got nothing important, useful, or logical to say. U're not even being a significant nuisance. And don't bother. I can't take someone who believes earth is at the center of the solar system ad is only 6000 old seriously. I'd rather go listen to badly sung chinese karaoke -
she does??? believe that earth is in the center of the SS?? o.OOriginally posted by HENG@:Of course, I know I won't. So that doesn't bother me.
As for your response, i din't even bother reading it. U've already demonstrated u've got nothing important, useful, or logical to say. U're not even being a significant nuisance. And don't bother. I can't take someone who believes earth is at the center of the solar system ad is only 6000 old seriously. I'd rather go listen to badly sung chinese karaoke -
I thought this sounds more like Roman Catholic than Christianity. According to history of science, the Roman Catholics says the Earth is the centre, not Sun. People who believed otherwise are killed. Galileo was put on home arrest for suggesting that.Originally posted by HENG@:Of course, I know I won't. So that doesn't bother me.
As for your response, i din't even bother reading it. U've already demonstrated u've got nothing important, useful, or logical to say. U're not even being a significant nuisance. And don't bother. I can't take someone who believes earth is at the center of the solar system ad is only 6000 old seriously. I'd rather go listen to badly sung chinese karaoke -
tell me about it. i've got better things to do now. i pity whoevers who's going to stay here to listen to ramblings about earth being 6000 years old. U'd think they'd wisely stay out of a topic like that. Instead they come in and do their best to live up to their reputations.Originally posted by klishcia:This is getting boring... *yawn* -
not really. just that I say that relativity dictates that there is no fixed reference point in the three dimensional space of the universe, and the only constant is the speed of light, hence any point can be the centre of the universe or solar system for that matter. But the use of the phrase solar system already takes into account that the sun is in the centre, if you notice.Originally posted by starblue:she does??? believe that earth is in the center of the SS?? o.O -
If Flat Earth Society and Square Earth Society exists, all kinds of people exists. Including those who believe Solar System is geocentric rather than heliocentric.Originally posted by starblue:she does??? believe that earth is in the center of the SS?? o.O -
Hey.. at least they did not tell u to convert or chose the bomb.
-
geocentricity and heliocentricity are concepts of newtonian physics, which is, as i have explained earlier, only an estimation which works under only circumstances.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:If Flat Earth Society and Square Earth Society exists, all kinds of people exists. Including those who believe Solar System is geocentric rather than heliocentric.
if you take the more accurate relativisitic physics into account, geocentricity and heliocentricity have no meaning, as they take into account fixed reference points. -
The reason why light is constant is because nothing goes faster than it. If anything goes faster than it, it won't be a constant. And that's why relativity makes sense.Originally posted by sgFish:not really. just that I say that relativity dictates that there is no fixed reference point in the three dimensional space of the universe, and the only constant is the speed of light, hence any point can be the centre of the universe or solar system for that matter. But the use of the phrase solar system already takes into account that the sun is in the centre, if you notice.
Universe may not be 3-D after all, due to all sorts of reasons you can find. -
alright then. If that's your position, i'll respect it.Originally posted by HENG@:tell me about it. i've got better things to do now. i pity whoevers who's going to stay here to listen to ramblings about earth being 6000 years old. U'd think they'd wisely stay out of a topic like that. Instead they come in and do their best to live up to their reputations.
unless someone begins to talk about what is in the centre of where -
Try converting and harrass me I will call the police.Originally posted by BadzMaro:Hey.. at least they did not tell u to convert or chose the bomb. -
nope. even if you're traveling at half the speed of light, and you measure the speed of a light beam going past you, it would be the same as measuring the speed of light when you're stationary.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:The reason why light is constant is because nothing goes faster than it. If anything goes faster than it, it won't be a constant. And that's why relativity makes sense.
Universe may not be 3-D after all, due to all sorts of reasons you can find.
don't they teach relativity in A level physics nowadays?
EDIT: To our senses the universe does appear as 3D. However, general relativity states that time is the fourth dimension, and it can be distorted in the presence of a gravitational force of a large mass