Did the U.S. government attacked its own country on 9/11?
-
Talking about the Fake moon landing theory... I'm surprise that to this day of advance technologic leap. We could get no photographic imagery on the Lunar Landing sites. Which is not impossible as the moon do not have an atmosphere.
The Japanese has a facility in space the could last year. But as the Japan, like British, pretty look like US lapdog, would review much. In fact, I believe even on earth we could do it.
If they would, all are explained. -
you can find out more on this website:jesus-is-savior.com
-
An old habit of human. Anything you cannot find a way to explain but still believe otherwise, you refer to godOriginally posted by assfer:you can find out more on this website:jesus-is-savior.com -
Honestly, I figured it was quite a feat that all 3 planes found and hit their targets in the first place.
Firstly, the supposed terrorists were not americans, and weren't living in the states they attacked, NY, and washington DC. Yet, for some reason, they were able to navigate effectively , identify their target buildings, and fly a large plane right into it.
There were explanations where they took control of the jet a precise point of the flight, so that they could use visual references (at 32000ft,
) fly a certain heading, descend , look for landmark features and navigate an aircraft they've never flown before, and crash them into a building with cruise missile precisions.
Even combat pilots have difficulty identifying targets to bomb with precision guided munitions. And thats WITH experience in their Jet, WITH experience with handling sophisticated equipment such as air to ground radars and targetting pods, and WITH aerial reconnaisance of their targets so that they can identify their targets effectively. With that, they still DO make mistakes, and can hit the wrong target. These are combat pilots with perhaps hundreds and hundreds of flight hours under their belt.
Yet, terrorists, whom the US government claims to have limited piloting knowledge, had such navigation expertise, expert control of a totally unfamiliar jet, ( you really don't go to flight schools and requests to learn how to fly in a Boeing 757 ), and guides their BUS of a jet into high value targets with such precision.
These terrorists should probably join the Air Force. -
Yup, also, the USA identified the terrorist pilot by saying they found his passport lying beside the rubble of WTC.
Yet, 7 out of 8 blackbox from the plane, built with the strongest metal known to mankind, had been said to have melted.
Now what is his passport made of? -
Well, they shud make the blackboxes out of that passport material.
-
bush n blair r gayOriginally posted by FireIce:yah yah yah
land on the moon oso fake one
911 oso fake one
wat else?
clinton is gay?
-
passport made of imaginary paperOriginally posted by chenc:Yup, also, the USA identified the terrorist pilot by saying they found his passport lying beside the rubble of WTC.
Yet, 7 out of 8 blackbox from the plane, built with the strongest metal known to mankind, had been said to have melted.
Now what is his passport made of? -
US Government was gonna use this...
but too costly... or else THIS wouldve happened.. or else too much evidence points to the US n Hollywood. -
Are u that really simple minded? no one is bitting you tail. Poor in english mean not well educated person? Jap, German, French, Chinese are not well educated then?Originally posted by chenc:Yup, also, the USA identified the terrorist pilot by saying they found his passport lying beside the rubble of WTC.
Yet, 7 out of 8 blackbox from the plane, built with the strongest metal known to mankind, had been said to have melted.
Now what is his passport made of?
Since when you are so active in this post and keep shooting everyone? Another new internet(behind the scene) hero?
Strongest metal doesnt mean will not melt. If it doesnt melt how can it be shape into a box? AirJet fuel are extremely high in temp when burning.
Also in a crash... eg. car crash.... all the debris and parts can be flying all over and metres away let alone a jet travelling at 10x the speed. -
The building collapse because of the melting metal that is the framework of the building of the pillar or support of the building which was due to the ultra burning heat of the jet fuel. Fire can burn metal and brick....Originally posted by chenc:World Trade Centre has one of the best structure ever design and built. And many professional structure designers and engineers had all voiced that a building able to with-stand earthquakes is impossible to just fell because of a plane crash.
Theres must be another force, a greater one, at work. And can you imagine hundreds of terroist walking into World Trade Centre carrying tonnes of explosives without being discovered?
So who else can plant the bombs inside WTC?
If you said the bomb is preplanted the it makes sense but hundred of terrorist walking into the world trade centre and carrying tonnes of explosive? You imagination is too good. -
Ok, this makes sense as the government might be trying to cover up which indeed is a great shame if the bomb was already there an unnoticeable.Originally posted by chenc:If it is not Americans killing Americans, then the government is trying to cover up some fact. Maybe bombs were really planted inside the building before-hand and the intelligence and authorities failed to notice it. Since this is a great shame, its being covered-up.
In any case, a plane can never do that much demage to what is considered one of the most remarkable buildings. -
Originally posted by LittleTiger:Are u that really simple minded? no one is bitting you tail. Poor in english doe not mean not well educated person? Jap, German, French are not well educated then?
Since when you are so active in this post and keep shooting everyone? Another new internet(behind the scene) hero?
Strongest metal doesnt mean will not melt. If it doesnt melt how can it be shape into a box? AirJet fuel are extremely high in temp when burning.
Also in a crash... eg. car crash.... all the debris and parts can be flying all over and metres away let alone a jet travelling at 10x the speed. -
Everything will just remain as 'speculation', right?
No matter what facts are presented - there is no absolute proof to the claims. There is no way that we can determine for sure and without reasonable doubt who is right / wrong and for what purposes... and perhaps the people who do know will take the secret to their graves (if they haven't already).
Imagine what WILL happen if we were to be informed of what / who are actually responsible for certain events in the world! There will never be answers that will not be marred by controversy.
I watched the videos sometime back - and till today... reading all that has been posted here, I am still mulling over it. It may be a 'documentary', it may also be a cleverly guised propaganda, but still - it did get most of us thinking, and wondering.
Apart from the cover-ups, missing black boxes, debris and an (almost) questionable way the buildings collapsed... It does occur to my logical mind that many things simply do not add up.
The buildings were made with reinforced steel - designed to withstand the most horrific natural disasters. After fires which have occured in buildings... immortalised in the film "The Towering Inferno" and such; I'm sure that in the construction of such a massive structure, they would have taken into account all these. Even before this film, the first thing that came into my mind as I watched footage on the evening of Sept 11, 2001 - was precisely that.
I thought in disbelief: "The planes flattened the towers and leveled it to the ground? - You gotta be kidding me!" Watching the incident as it happened did nothing to appease my mind... for it looked to me that simultaneous explosions happening near (and around) the point of impact erupted after the planes smashed into the building.
As for the Pentagon crash - it's funny how there aren't any remnants of the crashed plane. Weird, even. Then again, I found this video: test crash
Of course - some may argue that whoever's responsible, planted bombs IN the buildings itself to ensure complete destruction... but why aren't there reports of that at all? It would've been so much simpler for them to note that there have been remnants of bombs in the aftermath, and we would be none the wiser. Or would that have carried more risks than we would care to know?
Money and / or Power IS a powerful motivation. As for the truth - the whole truth and nothing but... I highly doubt we will ever find closure.
-
they just want da arab laandss...and da oil....so they r trying to make it that da muslims r bad...and when da muslims try their best to fight back...they labelled em as terrorists....but they r also fucked up muslims like da one who bomb bali...nehow bomb ppl....and still dare to say they do it coz of islam....
now usa gonna attack who? IRAN of coz... next is syria.....how predictable... north korea also have nuclear...they never attack... no oil what..wht for waste time -
Remember they stated that bomb sniffing dogs were strangely removed from the buldings a week or 2 before the buldings fell can't help but make be think that someone or some organisation has planted the bombs before hand.
Also right when the buldings fell, you can clearly see tiny explosions coming out of the windows.
If those aern't explosives, then what the hell is it? -
Even if it WAS an inside job,what can we all do? It's typical of us to speculate and speculate but do nothing about it...all this hints at something much more darker than we can imagine. Then again i'm a conspiracy buff.
-
whatever it is.. it is eye/brain candy for me
-
titanium melts at temperatures over 1600 degrees. gg kthx.Originally posted by LittleTiger:Are u that really simple minded? no one is bitting you tail. Poor in english mean not well educated person? Jap, German, French, Chinese are not well educated then?
Since when you are so active in this post and keep shooting everyone? Another new internet(behind the scene) hero?
Strongest metal doesnt mean will not melt. If it doesnt melt how can it be shape into a box? AirJet fuel are extremely high in temp when burning.
Also in a crash... eg. car crash.... all the debris and parts can be flying all over and metres away let alone a jet travelling at 10x the speed. -
fuck thatOriginally posted by assfer:you can find out more on this website:jesus-is-savior.com -
eh. blackboxes in planes are made to survive in a plane crash/explosion/disaster etc. that's why they are even in the plane in the first place. planes have been destroyed, burned, exploded, crashed, sunk, blown up, and what not and the black boxes almost always survive? watch air crash investigation and seconds to disaster on NGC - they have almost never found a damaged black box. -.- or at least the information is almost always safe inside the box. sheesh.Originally posted by LittleTiger:Strongest metal doesnt mean will not melt. If it doesnt melt how can it be shape into a box? AirJet fuel are extremely high in temp when burning.
Also in a crash... eg. car crash.... all the debris and parts can be flying all over and metres away let alone a jet travelling at 10x the speed. -
chenc:"Survey shows 80% believes the government is hiding the truth and might has part in 911, while 30% believes they kill their own people"
Firstly you have no survey shown and no link to one. Secondly surveys are very vague. For one you never know who took the survey, another is you don't know the demographics of the people who took it, and lastly you don't know if it was made up. For all you know they could have asked a bunch of people who are at an anti government rally, so I don't believe you the survey. Also a survey is of only a select few, maybe 500 people, it's not reflective of anything. IMO surveys are a waste of time, not just that one but all surveys in general. -
Simple Question.... Can you explain WTC7's collapse ?Originally posted by Lorenzo2:Firstly you have no survey shown and no link to one. Secondly surveys are very vague. For one you never know who took the survey, another is you don't know the demographics of the people who took it, and lastly you don't know if it was made up. For all you know they could have asked a bunch of people who are at an anti government rally, so I don't believe you the survey. Also a survey is of only a select few, maybe 500 people, it's not reflective of anything. IMO surveys are a waste of time, not just that one but all surveys in general.
No one could ... 9/11 commssion avoided it.. the mass media makes no mention of it (as best as they could) ...
So dude.. answer the Question.
Just a little snippet, the air controller supervisor was said to have destroyed the transmission tapes with jest, and deposited in bins across different section if the aircontrol building, before it can be transcripted or replayed, defying FAA instructions to retain all articles. This came out during the trial of an alledge would be hijacker (known to be of Unsound mind) recently. -
LOL. Cool. I didn't know you will take it so personally.Originally posted by LittleTiger:The building collapse because of the melting metal that is the framework of the building of the pillar or support of the building which was due to the ultra burning heat of the jet fuel. Fire can burn metal and brick....
If you said the bomb is preplanted the it makes sense but hundred of terrorist walking into the world trade centre and carrying tonnes of explosive? You imagination is too good.
Anyway, fuel from planes only burn at a temperature of 1000'C max on Earth. Titanium has a minimum boiling point of 1500'C.
I guess I need to say no more
-
Sorry i didn't make it clear. Think its CNN or something. They conduct it by asking people to leave their personal informations so they can check it out later. They always conduct survey for US elections and is mostly quite accurate. Forgot the link though. How many people remember every link of every webpage they viewed. But you can always check it out and correct meOriginally posted by Lorenzo2:Firstly you have no survey shown and no link to one. Secondly surveys are very vague. For one you never know who took the survey, another is you don't know the demographics of the people who took it, and lastly you don't know if it was made up. For all you know they could have asked a bunch of people who are at an anti government rally, so I don't believe you the survey. Also a survey is of only a select few, maybe 500 people, it's not reflective of anything. IMO surveys are a waste of time, not just that one but all surveys in general.